Cargando…

Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Achieving a sufficient level of functional ambulation remains to be a challenge to most stroke survivors. Different modes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been applied for improving various aspects of walking and mobility following stroke. However, systematic reviews before 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tien, Hui-Hsun, Liu, Wen-Yu, Chen, Yi-Lin, Wu, Yi-Chen, Lien, Hen-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000427
_version_ 1783606347094294528
author Tien, Hui-Hsun
Liu, Wen-Yu
Chen, Yi-Lin
Wu, Yi-Chen
Lien, Hen-Yu
author_facet Tien, Hui-Hsun
Liu, Wen-Yu
Chen, Yi-Lin
Wu, Yi-Chen
Lien, Hen-Yu
author_sort Tien, Hui-Hsun
collection PubMed
description Achieving a sufficient level of functional ambulation remains to be a challenge to most stroke survivors. Different modes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been applied for improving various aspects of walking and mobility following stroke. However, systematic reviews before 2017 provided only general effects of tDCS on limited walking outcomes. Therefore, the aims of this study were to update the evidence of tDCS for improving walking and mobility after stroke with emphasis on individual outcomes and to delineate the effects of different modes of tDCS in subgroup analysis. The systematic search of PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published up to January 2019 identified 14 eligible reports. The PEDro scale indicated a good methodological quality of the included studies (score 6.8). The meta-analysis of primary outcomes revealed that active tDCS had no better effect than sham on walking speed [n = 7, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.189, P = 0.252] and 6-minute walking distance (n = 3, SMD = 0.209, P = 0.453). Among the secondary outcomes, significant positive effects were found on functional ambulation category (FAC) (n = 5, SMD = 0.542, P = 0.008), Rivermead Mobility Index (n = 3, SMD = 0.699, P = 0.008), and timed up and go test (TUG) (n = 5, SMD = 0.676, P = 0.001), whereas non-significant positive effects were found on Tinetti test (n = 3, SMD = 0.441, P = 0.062) and Berg Balance Scale (n = 2, SMD = 0.408, P = 0.177). In subgroup analyses, anodal tDCS had significant positive effects on FAC (n = 4, SMD = 0.611, P = 0.005) and dual-hemispheric tDCS on TUG (n = 2, SMD = 1.090, P = 0.000). The results provide up-to-date evidence of variable effects of tDCS on walking and functional mobility after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76438002020-11-12 Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Tien, Hui-Hsun Liu, Wen-Yu Chen, Yi-Lin Wu, Yi-Chen Lien, Hen-Yu Int J Rehabil Res Review Articles Achieving a sufficient level of functional ambulation remains to be a challenge to most stroke survivors. Different modes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been applied for improving various aspects of walking and mobility following stroke. However, systematic reviews before 2017 provided only general effects of tDCS on limited walking outcomes. Therefore, the aims of this study were to update the evidence of tDCS for improving walking and mobility after stroke with emphasis on individual outcomes and to delineate the effects of different modes of tDCS in subgroup analysis. The systematic search of PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published up to January 2019 identified 14 eligible reports. The PEDro scale indicated a good methodological quality of the included studies (score 6.8). The meta-analysis of primary outcomes revealed that active tDCS had no better effect than sham on walking speed [n = 7, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.189, P = 0.252] and 6-minute walking distance (n = 3, SMD = 0.209, P = 0.453). Among the secondary outcomes, significant positive effects were found on functional ambulation category (FAC) (n = 5, SMD = 0.542, P = 0.008), Rivermead Mobility Index (n = 3, SMD = 0.699, P = 0.008), and timed up and go test (TUG) (n = 5, SMD = 0.676, P = 0.001), whereas non-significant positive effects were found on Tinetti test (n = 3, SMD = 0.441, P = 0.062) and Berg Balance Scale (n = 2, SMD = 0.408, P = 0.177). In subgroup analyses, anodal tDCS had significant positive effects on FAC (n = 4, SMD = 0.611, P = 0.005) and dual-hemispheric tDCS on TUG (n = 2, SMD = 1.090, P = 0.000). The results provide up-to-date evidence of variable effects of tDCS on walking and functional mobility after stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-07-14 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7643800/ /pubmed/32675686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000427 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Tien, Hui-Hsun
Liu, Wen-Yu
Chen, Yi-Lin
Wu, Yi-Chen
Lien, Hen-Yu
Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation for improving ambulation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000427
work_keys_str_mv AT tienhuihsun transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforimprovingambulationafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwenyu transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforimprovingambulationafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyilin transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforimprovingambulationafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyichen transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforimprovingambulationafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lienhenyu transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforimprovingambulationafterstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis