Cargando…

Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION: Aims were to test hypothesis that esophageal provocation-induced reflexes are superior with acid suppression plus feeding modifications vs acid suppression alone among infants treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Infants (N = 49, 41.3 ± 2.6 of postmenstrual age)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jadcherla, Sudarshan R., Hasenstab, Kathryn A., Gulati, Ish K., Helmick, Roseanna, Ipek, Haluk, Yildiz, Vedat, Wei, Lai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259163
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000249
_version_ 1783606356447592448
author Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Hasenstab, Kathryn A.
Gulati, Ish K.
Helmick, Roseanna
Ipek, Haluk
Yildiz, Vedat
Wei, Lai
author_facet Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Hasenstab, Kathryn A.
Gulati, Ish K.
Helmick, Roseanna
Ipek, Haluk
Yildiz, Vedat
Wei, Lai
author_sort Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Aims were to test hypothesis that esophageal provocation-induced reflexes are superior with acid suppression plus feeding modifications vs acid suppression alone among infants treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Infants (N = 49, 41.3 ± 2.6 of postmenstrual age) with acid reflux index >3% underwent longitudinal motility testing (weeks 0 and 5) with graded midesophageal provocation to test randomly allocated therapies (4 weeks' proton pump inhibitor [PPI] ± feeding modifications) on sensory-motor aerodigestive reflexes. Feeding modification included restricted fluid volume <140 mL/kg per day, fed over 30 minutes in right lateral position and supine postprandial position. Primary motility outcome was frequency-occurrence of peristaltic reflex. Secondary outcomes included upper esophageal sphincter contractile reflex, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation reflex, respiratory change, and symptom characteristics. RESULTS: Treatment groups did not differ for primary outcome (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.6, P = 0.99) or secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). For both treatment groups at follow-up, distal esophageal contraction and LES tone decreased, and LES relaxation reflex occurrence is less frequent (all P < 0.05). In a subgroup analysis, comparing infants with PPI washout (N = 40) vs with continued (N = 9) PPI therapy, no differences were noted for aerodigestive reflex response frequency-occurrence (all P > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In infants with GERD, feeding modification with acid suppression is not superior to acid suppression alone in modifying aerodigestive reflexes (frequency, sensation, or magnitude). Contiguous areas targeted by GER, i.e., LES and distal esophageal functions, worsened at follow-up for both groups despite PPI therapy. Maturation is likely the key factor for GERD resolution in infants, justifying the use of placebo in clinical trials for objectively determined GERD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7643906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76439062020-11-06 Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Hasenstab, Kathryn A. Gulati, Ish K. Helmick, Roseanna Ipek, Haluk Yildiz, Vedat Wei, Lai Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article INTRODUCTION: Aims were to test hypothesis that esophageal provocation-induced reflexes are superior with acid suppression plus feeding modifications vs acid suppression alone among infants treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Infants (N = 49, 41.3 ± 2.6 of postmenstrual age) with acid reflux index >3% underwent longitudinal motility testing (weeks 0 and 5) with graded midesophageal provocation to test randomly allocated therapies (4 weeks' proton pump inhibitor [PPI] ± feeding modifications) on sensory-motor aerodigestive reflexes. Feeding modification included restricted fluid volume <140 mL/kg per day, fed over 30 minutes in right lateral position and supine postprandial position. Primary motility outcome was frequency-occurrence of peristaltic reflex. Secondary outcomes included upper esophageal sphincter contractile reflex, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation reflex, respiratory change, and symptom characteristics. RESULTS: Treatment groups did not differ for primary outcome (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.6, P = 0.99) or secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). For both treatment groups at follow-up, distal esophageal contraction and LES tone decreased, and LES relaxation reflex occurrence is less frequent (all P < 0.05). In a subgroup analysis, comparing infants with PPI washout (N = 40) vs with continued (N = 9) PPI therapy, no differences were noted for aerodigestive reflex response frequency-occurrence (all P > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In infants with GERD, feeding modification with acid suppression is not superior to acid suppression alone in modifying aerodigestive reflexes (frequency, sensation, or magnitude). Contiguous areas targeted by GER, i.e., LES and distal esophageal functions, worsened at follow-up for both groups despite PPI therapy. Maturation is likely the key factor for GERD resolution in infants, justifying the use of placebo in clinical trials for objectively determined GERD. Wolters Kluwer 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7643906/ /pubmed/33259163 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000249 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Hasenstab, Kathryn A.
Gulati, Ish K.
Helmick, Roseanna
Ipek, Haluk
Yildiz, Vedat
Wei, Lai
Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort impact of feeding strategies with acid suppression on esophageal reflexes in human neonates with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259163
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000249
work_keys_str_mv AT jadcherlasudarshanr impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hasenstabkathryna impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gulatiishk impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT helmickroseanna impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ipekhaluk impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yildizvedat impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT weilai impactoffeedingstrategieswithacidsuppressiononesophagealreflexesinhumanneonateswithgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial