Cargando…
Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study
BACKGROUND: A debate about the scientific quality of COVID-19 themed research has emerged. We explored whether the quality of evidence of COVID-19 publications is lower when compared to nonCOVID-19 publications in the three highest ranked scientific medical journals. METHODS: We searched the PubMed...
Autores principales: | Zdravkovic, Marko, Berger-Estilita, Joana, Zdravkovic, Bogdan, Berger, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7643945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241826 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study
por: Zdravkovic, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A way forward in pulmonary aspiration incidence reduction: ultrasound, mathematics, and worldwide data collection
por: Zdravkovic, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
por: Berger-Estilita, Joana, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Health-Promoting Quality of Life at Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study on the Work-Related Sense of Coherence in Acute Care Healthcare Professionals
por: Berger-Estilita, Joana, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Using Gagné’s “Instructional Design” to teach clinically applicable knowledge in small groups
por: Berger-Estilita, Joana, et al.
Publicado: (2020)