Cargando…

Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach

An explicit understanding of false belief develops around the age of four years. However, tasks based on spontaneous responses have revealed an implicit understanding of belief and other theory of mind constructs in infants in their second year of life. The few longitudinal studies that have examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poulin-Dubois, Diane, Azar, Naomi, Elkaim, Brandon, Burnside, Kimberly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241721
_version_ 1783606389923381248
author Poulin-Dubois, Diane
Azar, Naomi
Elkaim, Brandon
Burnside, Kimberly
author_facet Poulin-Dubois, Diane
Azar, Naomi
Elkaim, Brandon
Burnside, Kimberly
author_sort Poulin-Dubois, Diane
collection PubMed
description An explicit understanding of false belief develops around the age of four years. However, tasks based on spontaneous responses have revealed an implicit understanding of belief and other theory of mind constructs in infants in their second year of life. The few longitudinal studies that have examined conceptual continuity of theory of mind from infancy to early childhood have reported mixed findings. Here we report two longitudinal experiments to investigate the developmental relation between implicit and explicit theory of mind. No link was observed in the first experiment between false belief and intention understanding measured at 14 and 18 months with the violation of expectation paradigm and tasks measuring explicit and implicit false belief at four or five years of age. In the second experiment, infants aged 18 months were tested with a battery of tasks that measured knowledge inference and false belief. They were then tested with the theory of mind scale at five years of age. The parents completed the Children’s Social Understanding Scale (CSUS) and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). As in the first experiment, there were no associations between early and later forms of theory of mind. We suggest that these findings do not support the view that there is conceptual continuity in theory of mind development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7644065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76440652020-11-16 Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach Poulin-Dubois, Diane Azar, Naomi Elkaim, Brandon Burnside, Kimberly PLoS One Research Article An explicit understanding of false belief develops around the age of four years. However, tasks based on spontaneous responses have revealed an implicit understanding of belief and other theory of mind constructs in infants in their second year of life. The few longitudinal studies that have examined conceptual continuity of theory of mind from infancy to early childhood have reported mixed findings. Here we report two longitudinal experiments to investigate the developmental relation between implicit and explicit theory of mind. No link was observed in the first experiment between false belief and intention understanding measured at 14 and 18 months with the violation of expectation paradigm and tasks measuring explicit and implicit false belief at four or five years of age. In the second experiment, infants aged 18 months were tested with a battery of tasks that measured knowledge inference and false belief. They were then tested with the theory of mind scale at five years of age. The parents completed the Children’s Social Understanding Scale (CSUS) and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). As in the first experiment, there were no associations between early and later forms of theory of mind. We suggest that these findings do not support the view that there is conceptual continuity in theory of mind development. Public Library of Science 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7644065/ /pubmed/33152000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241721 Text en © 2020 Poulin-Dubois et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poulin-Dubois, Diane
Azar, Naomi
Elkaim, Brandon
Burnside, Kimberly
Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title_full Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title_fullStr Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title_full_unstemmed Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title_short Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach
title_sort testing the stability of theory of mind: a longitudinal approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241721
work_keys_str_mv AT poulinduboisdiane testingthestabilityoftheoryofmindalongitudinalapproach
AT azarnaomi testingthestabilityoftheoryofmindalongitudinalapproach
AT elkaimbrandon testingthestabilityoftheoryofmindalongitudinalapproach
AT burnsidekimberly testingthestabilityoftheoryofmindalongitudinalapproach