Cargando…
Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436 |
_version_ | 1783606458619789312 |
---|---|
author | Alawneh, John I. James, Ameh S. Phillips, Nancy Fraser, Brandon Jury, Karen Soust, Martin Olchowy, Timothy W. J. |
author_facet | Alawneh, John I. James, Ameh S. Phillips, Nancy Fraser, Brandon Jury, Karen Soust, Martin Olchowy, Timothy W. J. |
author_sort | Alawneh, John I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of chemical residues in milk. An alternative treatment or prevention strategy based on probiotics has the potential to circumvent this risk. Two treatments were compared in a cross-over clinical trial in a single herd: a lactobacillus-based, post-milking teat spray (LACT), and a commercial iodine-based post-milking teat disinfectant product as (positive control, PC). The effect of the two treatments on cow somatic cell counts was quantified using a multivariate mixed-effects linear regression model with cow fitted as a random effect. The odds of teat end scores increasing from a low to a high score tended to be lower (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54–1.01, P = 0.06) for cows receiving LACT treatment. On average, there was also a tendency for a lower somatic cell counts in the LACT treated cows (antilog of coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.03, P = 0.13) compared with the PC treated cows. The application of the lactobacillus-based product to teats could reduce the rate of teat end scores progression from low to higher scores, and potentially improve teat end sphincter functions and udder health. Further, larger scale validation work is required to support the findings of the current study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7644449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76444492020-11-13 Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows Alawneh, John I. James, Ameh S. Phillips, Nancy Fraser, Brandon Jury, Karen Soust, Martin Olchowy, Timothy W. J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of chemical residues in milk. An alternative treatment or prevention strategy based on probiotics has the potential to circumvent this risk. Two treatments were compared in a cross-over clinical trial in a single herd: a lactobacillus-based, post-milking teat spray (LACT), and a commercial iodine-based post-milking teat disinfectant product as (positive control, PC). The effect of the two treatments on cow somatic cell counts was quantified using a multivariate mixed-effects linear regression model with cow fitted as a random effect. The odds of teat end scores increasing from a low to a high score tended to be lower (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54–1.01, P = 0.06) for cows receiving LACT treatment. On average, there was also a tendency for a lower somatic cell counts in the LACT treated cows (antilog of coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.03, P = 0.13) compared with the PC treated cows. The application of the lactobacillus-based product to teats could reduce the rate of teat end scores progression from low to higher scores, and potentially improve teat end sphincter functions and udder health. Further, larger scale validation work is required to support the findings of the current study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7644449/ /pubmed/33195609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alawneh, James, Phillips, Fraser, Jury, Soust and Olchowy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Alawneh, John I. James, Ameh S. Phillips, Nancy Fraser, Brandon Jury, Karen Soust, Martin Olchowy, Timothy W. J. Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title | Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title_full | Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title_short | Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows |
title_sort | efficacy of a lactobacillus-based teat spray on udder health in lactating dairy cows |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alawnehjohni efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT jamesamehs efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT phillipsnancy efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT fraserbrandon efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT jurykaren efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT soustmartin efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows AT olchowytimothywj efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows |