Cargando…

Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows

Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alawneh, John I., James, Ameh S., Phillips, Nancy, Fraser, Brandon, Jury, Karen, Soust, Martin, Olchowy, Timothy W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436
_version_ 1783606458619789312
author Alawneh, John I.
James, Ameh S.
Phillips, Nancy
Fraser, Brandon
Jury, Karen
Soust, Martin
Olchowy, Timothy W. J.
author_facet Alawneh, John I.
James, Ameh S.
Phillips, Nancy
Fraser, Brandon
Jury, Karen
Soust, Martin
Olchowy, Timothy W. J.
author_sort Alawneh, John I.
collection PubMed
description Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of chemical residues in milk. An alternative treatment or prevention strategy based on probiotics has the potential to circumvent this risk. Two treatments were compared in a cross-over clinical trial in a single herd: a lactobacillus-based, post-milking teat spray (LACT), and a commercial iodine-based post-milking teat disinfectant product as (positive control, PC). The effect of the two treatments on cow somatic cell counts was quantified using a multivariate mixed-effects linear regression model with cow fitted as a random effect. The odds of teat end scores increasing from a low to a high score tended to be lower (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54–1.01, P = 0.06) for cows receiving LACT treatment. On average, there was also a tendency for a lower somatic cell counts in the LACT treated cows (antilog of coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.03, P = 0.13) compared with the PC treated cows. The application of the lactobacillus-based product to teats could reduce the rate of teat end scores progression from low to higher scores, and potentially improve teat end sphincter functions and udder health. Further, larger scale validation work is required to support the findings of the current study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7644449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76444492020-11-13 Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows Alawneh, John I. James, Ameh S. Phillips, Nancy Fraser, Brandon Jury, Karen Soust, Martin Olchowy, Timothy W. J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Teat disinfection is a common pre- and post-milking mastitis prevention practice that is part of a mastitis control program in dairy herds. Commercially available teat disinfectants are generally chemical-based products. The use of these products has occasionally raised concerns about the risk of chemical residues in milk. An alternative treatment or prevention strategy based on probiotics has the potential to circumvent this risk. Two treatments were compared in a cross-over clinical trial in a single herd: a lactobacillus-based, post-milking teat spray (LACT), and a commercial iodine-based post-milking teat disinfectant product as (positive control, PC). The effect of the two treatments on cow somatic cell counts was quantified using a multivariate mixed-effects linear regression model with cow fitted as a random effect. The odds of teat end scores increasing from a low to a high score tended to be lower (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54–1.01, P = 0.06) for cows receiving LACT treatment. On average, there was also a tendency for a lower somatic cell counts in the LACT treated cows (antilog of coefficient = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.03, P = 0.13) compared with the PC treated cows. The application of the lactobacillus-based product to teats could reduce the rate of teat end scores progression from low to higher scores, and potentially improve teat end sphincter functions and udder health. Further, larger scale validation work is required to support the findings of the current study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7644449/ /pubmed/33195609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alawneh, James, Phillips, Fraser, Jury, Soust and Olchowy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Alawneh, John I.
James, Ameh S.
Phillips, Nancy
Fraser, Brandon
Jury, Karen
Soust, Martin
Olchowy, Timothy W. J.
Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title_full Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title_fullStr Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title_short Efficacy of a Lactobacillus-Based Teat Spray on Udder Health in Lactating Dairy Cows
title_sort efficacy of a lactobacillus-based teat spray on udder health in lactating dairy cows
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584436
work_keys_str_mv AT alawnehjohni efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT jamesamehs efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT phillipsnancy efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT fraserbrandon efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT jurykaren efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT soustmartin efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows
AT olchowytimothywj efficacyofalactobacillusbasedteatsprayonudderhealthinlactatingdairycows