Cargando…
Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study
BACKGROUND: Current studies mainly focus on total weight loss and comorbidity reduction. Only a few studies compare Quality of Life (QoL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study was conducted to examine the extent of improvement in QoL on different domains after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07350-4 |
_version_ | 1783606477906247680 |
---|---|
author | Poelemeijer, Youri Q. M. van der Knaap, Elise T. W. Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. Demirkiran, Ahmet Wiezer, Marinus J. Hazebroek, Eric J. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. |
author_facet | Poelemeijer, Youri Q. M. van der Knaap, Elise T. W. Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. Demirkiran, Ahmet Wiezer, Marinus J. Hazebroek, Eric J. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. |
author_sort | Poelemeijer, Youri Q. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current studies mainly focus on total weight loss and comorbidity reduction. Only a few studies compare Quality of Life (QoL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study was conducted to examine the extent of improvement in QoL on different domains after primary bariatric surgery and compare these results to Dutch reference values. METHODS: The study included prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery in five Dutch hospitals. The RAND-36 questionnaire was used to measure the patient’s QoL; preoperatively and twelve months postoperatively. Postoperative scores were compared to Dutch reference values, standardized for age, using t-test. A difference of more than 5% was considered a minimal important difference. A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to compare SG and RYGB on the extent of improvement, adjusted for case-mix factors. RESULTS: In total, 4864 patients completed both the pre- and postoperative questionnaire. Compared with Dutch reference values, patients postoperatively reported clinically relevant better physical functioning (RYGB + 6.8%), physical role limitations (SG + 5.6%; RYGB + 6.2%) and health change (SG + 77.1%; RYGB + 80.0%), but worse general health perception (SG − 22.8%; RYGB − 17.0%). Improvement in QoL was similar between SG and RYGB, except for physical functioning (β 2.758; p-value 0.008) and general health perception (β 2.607; p-value < 0.001) for which RYGB patients improved more. CONCLUSIONS: SG and RYGB patients achieved a better postoperative score in physical functioning, physical role limitations and health change compared to Dutch reference values, and a worse score in general health perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7644534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76445342020-11-10 Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study Poelemeijer, Youri Q. M. van der Knaap, Elise T. W. Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. Demirkiran, Ahmet Wiezer, Marinus J. Hazebroek, Eric J. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Current studies mainly focus on total weight loss and comorbidity reduction. Only a few studies compare Quality of Life (QoL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study was conducted to examine the extent of improvement in QoL on different domains after primary bariatric surgery and compare these results to Dutch reference values. METHODS: The study included prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery in five Dutch hospitals. The RAND-36 questionnaire was used to measure the patient’s QoL; preoperatively and twelve months postoperatively. Postoperative scores were compared to Dutch reference values, standardized for age, using t-test. A difference of more than 5% was considered a minimal important difference. A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to compare SG and RYGB on the extent of improvement, adjusted for case-mix factors. RESULTS: In total, 4864 patients completed both the pre- and postoperative questionnaire. Compared with Dutch reference values, patients postoperatively reported clinically relevant better physical functioning (RYGB + 6.8%), physical role limitations (SG + 5.6%; RYGB + 6.2%) and health change (SG + 77.1%; RYGB + 80.0%), but worse general health perception (SG − 22.8%; RYGB − 17.0%). Improvement in QoL was similar between SG and RYGB, except for physical functioning (β 2.758; p-value 0.008) and general health perception (β 2.607; p-value < 0.001) for which RYGB patients improved more. CONCLUSIONS: SG and RYGB patients achieved a better postoperative score in physical functioning, physical role limitations and health change compared to Dutch reference values, and a worse score in general health perception. Springer US 2020-01-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7644534/ /pubmed/31993820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07350-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Poelemeijer, Youri Q. M. van der Knaap, Elise T. W. Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. Demirkiran, Ahmet Wiezer, Marinus J. Hazebroek, Eric J. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title | Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title_full | Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title_fullStr | Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title_short | Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
title_sort | measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07350-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poelemeijeryouriqm measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT vanderknaapelisetw measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT marangvandemheenperlaj measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT demirkiranahmet measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT wiezermarinusj measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT hazebroekericj measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT grevejanwillemm measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy AT liemronaldsl measuringqualityoflifeinbariatricsurgeryamulticentrestudy |