Cargando…

Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jadcherla, Sudarshan R., Sultana, Zakia, Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A., Prabhakar, Varsha, Gulati, Ish K., Lorenzo, Carlo Di
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6
_version_ 1783606488994938880
author Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Sultana, Zakia
Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A.
Prabhakar, Varsha
Gulati, Ish K.
Lorenzo, Carlo Di
author_facet Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Sultana, Zakia
Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A.
Prabhakar, Varsha
Gulati, Ish K.
Lorenzo, Carlo Di
author_sort Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45) weeks postmenstrual age using 24-hour pH-impedance. Symptom associated probability (SAP) for acid and bolus components defined esophageal sensitivity: 1) S(Acid) as SAP≥95% for acid (pH<4), 2) S(Bolus) as SAP≥95% for bolus, 3) S(Acid+Bolus) as SAP≥95% for acid and bolus, or 4) S(None) as SAP<95% for acid and bolus. RESULTS: Esophageal sensitivity prevalence (S(Acid), SBolus, SAcid+Bolus, S(None)) was 28(10%), 94(34%), 65(23%), and 92(33%) respectively. Emesis occured more in SBolus and S(Acid+Bolus) vs S(None) (p<0.05). Magnitude (#/day) of cough and emesis events increased with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s vs S(None) (p<0.05). S(Acid+Bolus) had increased acid exposure vs S(None) (p<0.05). Distributions of feeding and breathing methods were distinct in infants with S(Bolus) vs S(None) (both, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that arching and irritability events/day were lesser at higher PMAs (p<0.001), greater for infants on NCPAP (p<0.01), with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s (p<0.05). Coughs/day was greater at higher PMAs (p<0.001), for infants with gavage and transitional feeding methods (p<0.02), with S(Bolu)s and S(Acid+Bolus) (p<0.05) but lesser with Trach (p<0.001). Number of emesis events/day were greater with SBolus and SAcid+Bolus (p<0.001). Sneezes/day decreased for infants on Trach (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. We differentiated esophageal sensitivity phenotypes in NICU infants referred for GERD symptoms using pH-Impedance. Acid sensitivity alone was rare, which may explain poor response to acid suppressives; aerodigestive symptoms were predominantly linked with bolus spread. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7644596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76445962021-03-21 Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Sultana, Zakia Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A. Prabhakar, Varsha Gulati, Ish K. Lorenzo, Carlo Di Pediatr Res Article OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45) weeks postmenstrual age using 24-hour pH-impedance. Symptom associated probability (SAP) for acid and bolus components defined esophageal sensitivity: 1) S(Acid) as SAP≥95% for acid (pH<4), 2) S(Bolus) as SAP≥95% for bolus, 3) S(Acid+Bolus) as SAP≥95% for acid and bolus, or 4) S(None) as SAP<95% for acid and bolus. RESULTS: Esophageal sensitivity prevalence (S(Acid), SBolus, SAcid+Bolus, S(None)) was 28(10%), 94(34%), 65(23%), and 92(33%) respectively. Emesis occured more in SBolus and S(Acid+Bolus) vs S(None) (p<0.05). Magnitude (#/day) of cough and emesis events increased with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s vs S(None) (p<0.05). S(Acid+Bolus) had increased acid exposure vs S(None) (p<0.05). Distributions of feeding and breathing methods were distinct in infants with S(Bolus) vs S(None) (both, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that arching and irritability events/day were lesser at higher PMAs (p<0.001), greater for infants on NCPAP (p<0.01), with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s (p<0.05). Coughs/day was greater at higher PMAs (p<0.001), for infants with gavage and transitional feeding methods (p<0.02), with S(Bolu)s and S(Acid+Bolus) (p<0.05) but lesser with Trach (p<0.001). Number of emesis events/day were greater with SBolus and SAcid+Bolus (p<0.001). Sneezes/day decreased for infants on Trach (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. We differentiated esophageal sensitivity phenotypes in NICU infants referred for GERD symptoms using pH-Impedance. Acid sensitivity alone was rare, which may explain poor response to acid suppressives; aerodigestive symptoms were predominantly linked with bolus spread. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms. 2020-05-06 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7644596/ /pubmed/32375162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Jadcherla, Sudarshan R.
Sultana, Zakia
Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A.
Prabhakar, Varsha
Gulati, Ish K.
Lorenzo, Carlo Di
Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title_full Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title_fullStr Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title_short Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
title_sort differentiating esophageal sensitivity phenotypes using ph-impedance in intensive care unit infants referred for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jadcherlasudarshanr differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms
AT sultanazakia differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms
AT hasenstabkenneykathryna differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms
AT prabhakarvarsha differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms
AT gulatiishk differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms
AT lorenzocarlodi differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms