Cargando…
Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms
OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6 |
_version_ | 1783606488994938880 |
---|---|
author | Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Sultana, Zakia Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A. Prabhakar, Varsha Gulati, Ish K. Lorenzo, Carlo Di |
author_facet | Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Sultana, Zakia Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A. Prabhakar, Varsha Gulati, Ish K. Lorenzo, Carlo Di |
author_sort | Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45) weeks postmenstrual age using 24-hour pH-impedance. Symptom associated probability (SAP) for acid and bolus components defined esophageal sensitivity: 1) S(Acid) as SAP≥95% for acid (pH<4), 2) S(Bolus) as SAP≥95% for bolus, 3) S(Acid+Bolus) as SAP≥95% for acid and bolus, or 4) S(None) as SAP<95% for acid and bolus. RESULTS: Esophageal sensitivity prevalence (S(Acid), SBolus, SAcid+Bolus, S(None)) was 28(10%), 94(34%), 65(23%), and 92(33%) respectively. Emesis occured more in SBolus and S(Acid+Bolus) vs S(None) (p<0.05). Magnitude (#/day) of cough and emesis events increased with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s vs S(None) (p<0.05). S(Acid+Bolus) had increased acid exposure vs S(None) (p<0.05). Distributions of feeding and breathing methods were distinct in infants with S(Bolus) vs S(None) (both, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that arching and irritability events/day were lesser at higher PMAs (p<0.001), greater for infants on NCPAP (p<0.01), with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s (p<0.05). Coughs/day was greater at higher PMAs (p<0.001), for infants with gavage and transitional feeding methods (p<0.02), with S(Bolu)s and S(Acid+Bolus) (p<0.05) but lesser with Trach (p<0.001). Number of emesis events/day were greater with SBolus and SAcid+Bolus (p<0.001). Sneezes/day decreased for infants on Trach (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. We differentiated esophageal sensitivity phenotypes in NICU infants referred for GERD symptoms using pH-Impedance. Acid sensitivity alone was rare, which may explain poor response to acid suppressives; aerodigestive symptoms were predominantly linked with bolus spread. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7644596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76445962021-03-21 Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Sultana, Zakia Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A. Prabhakar, Varsha Gulati, Ish K. Lorenzo, Carlo Di Pediatr Res Article OBJECTIVE: To identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S(Acid)), bolus (SBolus), acid and bolus (S(Acid+Bolus)), and none (S(None)) exposures in infants suspected with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Symptomatic infants (N=279) were evaluated for GERD at 42(40–45) weeks postmenstrual age using 24-hour pH-impedance. Symptom associated probability (SAP) for acid and bolus components defined esophageal sensitivity: 1) S(Acid) as SAP≥95% for acid (pH<4), 2) S(Bolus) as SAP≥95% for bolus, 3) S(Acid+Bolus) as SAP≥95% for acid and bolus, or 4) S(None) as SAP<95% for acid and bolus. RESULTS: Esophageal sensitivity prevalence (S(Acid), SBolus, SAcid+Bolus, S(None)) was 28(10%), 94(34%), 65(23%), and 92(33%) respectively. Emesis occured more in SBolus and S(Acid+Bolus) vs S(None) (p<0.05). Magnitude (#/day) of cough and emesis events increased with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s vs S(None) (p<0.05). S(Acid+Bolus) had increased acid exposure vs S(None) (p<0.05). Distributions of feeding and breathing methods were distinct in infants with S(Bolus) vs S(None) (both, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that arching and irritability events/day were lesser at higher PMAs (p<0.001), greater for infants on NCPAP (p<0.01), with S(Bolus) and S(Acid+Bolu)s (p<0.05). Coughs/day was greater at higher PMAs (p<0.001), for infants with gavage and transitional feeding methods (p<0.02), with S(Bolu)s and S(Acid+Bolus) (p<0.05) but lesser with Trach (p<0.001). Number of emesis events/day were greater with SBolus and SAcid+Bolus (p<0.001). Sneezes/day decreased for infants on Trach (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. We differentiated esophageal sensitivity phenotypes in NICU infants referred for GERD symptoms using pH-Impedance. Acid sensitivity alone was rare, which may explain poor response to acid suppressives; aerodigestive symptoms were predominantly linked with bolus spread. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms. 2020-05-06 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7644596/ /pubmed/32375162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Jadcherla, Sudarshan R. Sultana, Zakia Hasenstab-Kenney, Kathryn A. Prabhakar, Varsha Gulati, Ish K. Lorenzo, Carlo Di Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title | Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title_full | Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title_fullStr | Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title_short | Differentiating Esophageal Sensitivity Phenotypes using pH-Impedance in Intensive Care Unit Infants referred for Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms |
title_sort | differentiating esophageal sensitivity phenotypes using ph-impedance in intensive care unit infants referred for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0930-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jadcherlasudarshanr differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms AT sultanazakia differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms AT hasenstabkenneykathryna differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms AT prabhakarvarsha differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms AT gulatiishk differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms AT lorenzocarlodi differentiatingesophagealsensitivityphenotypesusingphimpedanceinintensivecareunitinfantsreferredforgastroesophagealrefluxsymptoms |