Cargando…

Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport

The Double Empathy Problem suggests that communicative difficulties between autistic and non-autistic people are due to bi-directional differences in communicative style and a reciprocal lack of understanding. If true, there should be increased similarity in interaction style, resulting in higher ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crompton, Catherine J., Sharp, Martha, Axbey, Harriet, Fletcher-Watson, Sue, Flynn, Emma G., Ropar, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171
_version_ 1783606580904722432
author Crompton, Catherine J.
Sharp, Martha
Axbey, Harriet
Fletcher-Watson, Sue
Flynn, Emma G.
Ropar, Danielle
author_facet Crompton, Catherine J.
Sharp, Martha
Axbey, Harriet
Fletcher-Watson, Sue
Flynn, Emma G.
Ropar, Danielle
author_sort Crompton, Catherine J.
collection PubMed
description The Double Empathy Problem suggests that communicative difficulties between autistic and non-autistic people are due to bi-directional differences in communicative style and a reciprocal lack of understanding. If true, there should be increased similarity in interaction style, resulting in higher rapport during interactions between pairs of the same neurotype. Here, we provide two empirical tests of rapport, with data revealing whether self- and observer- rated rapport varies depending on the match or mismatch in autism status within a pair. An additional opportunity afforded by these data is to examine the effect of the autism status of the rater on the perceived rapport between matched and mismatched pairs. In Study 1 72 participants were allocated to one of three dyad conditions: autistic pairs (n = 24), non-autistic pairs (n = 24) and mixed pairs (n = 12 autistic; n = 12 non-autistic). Each participant completed three semi-structured interactions with their partner, rating rapport after each interaction. Non-autistic pairs experienced higher self-rated rapport than mixed and autistic pairs, and autistic pairs experienced higher rapport than mixed pairs. In Study 2 (n = 80) autistic and non-autistic observers rated interactional rapport while watching videoed interactions between autistic pairs, non-autistic pairs, and mixed pairs (n = 18, a subset of participants in Study 1). Mixed pairs were rated significantly lower on rapport than autistic and non-autistic pairs, and autistic pairs were rated more highly for rapport than non-autistic pairs. Both autistic and non-autistic observers show similar patterns in how they rate the rapport of autistic, non-autistic, and mixed pairs. In summary, autistic people experience high interactional rapport when interacting with other autistic people, and this is also detected by external observers. Rather than autistic people experiencing low rapport in all contexts, their rapport ratings are influenced by a mismatch of diagnosis. These findings suggest that autistic people possess a distinct mode of social interaction style, rather than demonstrating social skills deficits. These data are considered in terms of their implications for psychological theories of autism, as well as practical impact on educational and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7645034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76450342020-11-13 Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport Crompton, Catherine J. Sharp, Martha Axbey, Harriet Fletcher-Watson, Sue Flynn, Emma G. Ropar, Danielle Front Psychol Psychology The Double Empathy Problem suggests that communicative difficulties between autistic and non-autistic people are due to bi-directional differences in communicative style and a reciprocal lack of understanding. If true, there should be increased similarity in interaction style, resulting in higher rapport during interactions between pairs of the same neurotype. Here, we provide two empirical tests of rapport, with data revealing whether self- and observer- rated rapport varies depending on the match or mismatch in autism status within a pair. An additional opportunity afforded by these data is to examine the effect of the autism status of the rater on the perceived rapport between matched and mismatched pairs. In Study 1 72 participants were allocated to one of three dyad conditions: autistic pairs (n = 24), non-autistic pairs (n = 24) and mixed pairs (n = 12 autistic; n = 12 non-autistic). Each participant completed three semi-structured interactions with their partner, rating rapport after each interaction. Non-autistic pairs experienced higher self-rated rapport than mixed and autistic pairs, and autistic pairs experienced higher rapport than mixed pairs. In Study 2 (n = 80) autistic and non-autistic observers rated interactional rapport while watching videoed interactions between autistic pairs, non-autistic pairs, and mixed pairs (n = 18, a subset of participants in Study 1). Mixed pairs were rated significantly lower on rapport than autistic and non-autistic pairs, and autistic pairs were rated more highly for rapport than non-autistic pairs. Both autistic and non-autistic observers show similar patterns in how they rate the rapport of autistic, non-autistic, and mixed pairs. In summary, autistic people experience high interactional rapport when interacting with other autistic people, and this is also detected by external observers. Rather than autistic people experiencing low rapport in all contexts, their rapport ratings are influenced by a mismatch of diagnosis. These findings suggest that autistic people possess a distinct mode of social interaction style, rather than demonstrating social skills deficits. These data are considered in terms of their implications for psychological theories of autism, as well as practical impact on educational and clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7645034/ /pubmed/33192918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171 Text en Copyright © 2020 Crompton, Sharp, Axbey, Fletcher-Watson, Flynn and Ropar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Crompton, Catherine J.
Sharp, Martha
Axbey, Harriet
Fletcher-Watson, Sue
Flynn, Emma G.
Ropar, Danielle
Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title_full Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title_fullStr Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title_full_unstemmed Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title_short Neurotype-Matching, but Not Being Autistic, Influences Self and Observer Ratings of Interpersonal Rapport
title_sort neurotype-matching, but not being autistic, influences self and observer ratings of interpersonal rapport
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171
work_keys_str_mv AT cromptoncatherinej neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport
AT sharpmartha neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport
AT axbeyharriet neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport
AT fletcherwatsonsue neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport
AT flynnemmag neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport
AT ropardanielle neurotypematchingbutnotbeingautisticinfluencesselfandobserverratingsofinterpersonalrapport