Cargando…
Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers
OBJECTIVE: Needlestick injuries caused by insulin pen injection are a serious occupational hazard for health care workers in China. We evaluated the prevalence of stick injuries with insulin pen injection and identified associated risk factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520965400 |
_version_ | 1783606657350107136 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yanlin Liu, Li Cai, Kaixiu Zhang, Lirong Liu, Ling Zhou, Xianli Liu, Zhiping Peng, Yu |
author_facet | Zhang, Yanlin Liu, Li Cai, Kaixiu Zhang, Lirong Liu, Ling Zhou, Xianli Liu, Zhiping Peng, Yu |
author_sort | Zhang, Yanlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Needlestick injuries caused by insulin pen injection are a serious occupational hazard for health care workers in China. We evaluated the prevalence of stick injuries with insulin pen injection and identified associated risk factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 October to 30 November 2018 in two tier three hospitals in Chongqing, China. Self-administered questionnaires were developed by the Chinese Nursing Association Diabetes Care Special Committee. We analyzed associations between potential risk factors and injuries at different operational steps. RESULTS: A total 233 of 302 (77%) participants (mean age 28.5±5.3 years) reported a needlestick incident. Most respondents (49%) had 3 to 10 years’ working experience and had received injection safety training. Most needlestick injuries occurred while recapping needles after injection. The risk of injury was significantly associated with department and job position. The injury rate increased with increased number of years worked. Respondents with ≥10 years working experience reported the highest needle-capping injury rate (88%): odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 3.69. CONCLUSION: Recapping needles after injection showed the highest risk for stick injury with an insulin pen. Nurses in the surgery department and those with longer work histories were more likely to be injured. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7645520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76455202020-11-17 Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers Zhang, Yanlin Liu, Li Cai, Kaixiu Zhang, Lirong Liu, Ling Zhou, Xianli Liu, Zhiping Peng, Yu J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Needlestick injuries caused by insulin pen injection are a serious occupational hazard for health care workers in China. We evaluated the prevalence of stick injuries with insulin pen injection and identified associated risk factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 October to 30 November 2018 in two tier three hospitals in Chongqing, China. Self-administered questionnaires were developed by the Chinese Nursing Association Diabetes Care Special Committee. We analyzed associations between potential risk factors and injuries at different operational steps. RESULTS: A total 233 of 302 (77%) participants (mean age 28.5±5.3 years) reported a needlestick incident. Most respondents (49%) had 3 to 10 years’ working experience and had received injection safety training. Most needlestick injuries occurred while recapping needles after injection. The risk of injury was significantly associated with department and job position. The injury rate increased with increased number of years worked. Respondents with ≥10 years working experience reported the highest needle-capping injury rate (88%): odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 3.69. CONCLUSION: Recapping needles after injection showed the highest risk for stick injury with an insulin pen. Nurses in the surgery department and those with longer work histories were more likely to be injured. SAGE Publications 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7645520/ /pubmed/33108918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520965400 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Clinical Research Report Zhang, Yanlin Liu, Li Cai, Kaixiu Zhang, Lirong Liu, Ling Zhou, Xianli Liu, Zhiping Peng, Yu Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title | Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title_full | Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title_fullStr | Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title_short | Cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
title_sort | cross-sectional study assessing the risk of needlestick injury from an insulin pen among nursing care providers |
topic | Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520965400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyanlin crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT liuli crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT caikaixiu crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT zhanglirong crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT liuling crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT zhouxianli crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT liuzhiping crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders AT pengyu crosssectionalstudyassessingtheriskofneedlestickinjuryfromaninsulinpenamongnursingcareproviders |