Cargando…

Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference

IMPORTANCE: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) can interfere with cfDNA testing and cause incorrect interpretation of results. There is an urgent need to better understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Kendal, Konnick, Eric Q., Schweizer, Michael T., Sokolova, Alexandra O., Grivas, Petros, Cheng, Heather H., Klemfuss, Nola M., Beightol, Mallory, Yu, Evan Y., Nelson, Peter S., Montgomery, Bruce, Pritchard, Colin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5161
_version_ 1783606692932485120
author Jensen, Kendal
Konnick, Eric Q.
Schweizer, Michael T.
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Grivas, Petros
Cheng, Heather H.
Klemfuss, Nola M.
Beightol, Mallory
Yu, Evan Y.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, Bruce
Pritchard, Colin C.
author_facet Jensen, Kendal
Konnick, Eric Q.
Schweizer, Michael T.
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Grivas, Petros
Cheng, Heather H.
Klemfuss, Nola M.
Beightol, Mallory
Yu, Evan Y.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, Bruce
Pritchard, Colin C.
author_sort Jensen, Kendal
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) can interfere with cfDNA testing and cause incorrect interpretation of results. There is an urgent need to better understand this problem following recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) for metastatic prostate cancer based on variants in DNA repair genes that can be affected by CHIP. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant CHIP interference in prostate cancer cfDNA testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We report a case series of 69 patients with advanced prostate cancer (metastatic disease or with rising PSA following localized therapy) who had cfDNA variant testing with a large panel cancer next generation sequencing assay (UW-OncoPlexCT). To determine the source of variants in plasma, we tested paired cfDNA and whole blood control samples. The study was carried out in an academic medical center system reference laboratory. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence and gene spectrum of CHIP interference in patients with prostate cancer undergoing cfDNA testing. RESULTS: We detected CHIP variants at 2% or more variant fraction in cfDNA from 13 of 69 men with prostate cancer (19%; 95% CI, 10%-30%). Seven men (10%; 95% CI, 4%-20%) had CHIP variants in DNA repair genes used to determine PARPi candidacy, including ATM (n = 5), BRCA2 (n = 1), and CHEK2 (n = 1). Overall, CHIP variants accounted for almost half of the somatic DNA repair gene variants detected. Participant CHIP variants were exponentially correlated with older age (R(2) = 0.82). CHIP interference variants could be distinguished from prostate cancer variants using a paired whole-blood control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this case series, approximately 10% of men with advanced prostate cancer had CHIP interference in plasma cfDNA in DNA repair genes that are used for eligibility of PARPi therapy, most frequently in ATM. Clinical cfDNA testing should include a paired whole-blood control to exclude CHIP variants and avoid misdiagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7645740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76457402020-11-12 Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference Jensen, Kendal Konnick, Eric Q. Schweizer, Michael T. Sokolova, Alexandra O. Grivas, Petros Cheng, Heather H. Klemfuss, Nola M. Beightol, Mallory Yu, Evan Y. Nelson, Peter S. Montgomery, Bruce Pritchard, Colin C. JAMA Oncol Brief Report IMPORTANCE: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) can interfere with cfDNA testing and cause incorrect interpretation of results. There is an urgent need to better understand this problem following recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) for metastatic prostate cancer based on variants in DNA repair genes that can be affected by CHIP. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant CHIP interference in prostate cancer cfDNA testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We report a case series of 69 patients with advanced prostate cancer (metastatic disease or with rising PSA following localized therapy) who had cfDNA variant testing with a large panel cancer next generation sequencing assay (UW-OncoPlexCT). To determine the source of variants in plasma, we tested paired cfDNA and whole blood control samples. The study was carried out in an academic medical center system reference laboratory. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence and gene spectrum of CHIP interference in patients with prostate cancer undergoing cfDNA testing. RESULTS: We detected CHIP variants at 2% or more variant fraction in cfDNA from 13 of 69 men with prostate cancer (19%; 95% CI, 10%-30%). Seven men (10%; 95% CI, 4%-20%) had CHIP variants in DNA repair genes used to determine PARPi candidacy, including ATM (n = 5), BRCA2 (n = 1), and CHEK2 (n = 1). Overall, CHIP variants accounted for almost half of the somatic DNA repair gene variants detected. Participant CHIP variants were exponentially correlated with older age (R(2) = 0.82). CHIP interference variants could be distinguished from prostate cancer variants using a paired whole-blood control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this case series, approximately 10% of men with advanced prostate cancer had CHIP interference in plasma cfDNA in DNA repair genes that are used for eligibility of PARPi therapy, most frequently in ATM. Clinical cfDNA testing should include a paired whole-blood control to exclude CHIP variants and avoid misdiagnosis. American Medical Association 2020-11-05 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7645740/ /pubmed/33151258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5161 Text en Copyright 2020 Jensen K et al. JAMA Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Jensen, Kendal
Konnick, Eric Q.
Schweizer, Michael T.
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Grivas, Petros
Cheng, Heather H.
Klemfuss, Nola M.
Beightol, Mallory
Yu, Evan Y.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, Bruce
Pritchard, Colin C.
Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title_full Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title_fullStr Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title_full_unstemmed Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title_short Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference
title_sort association of clonal hematopoiesis in dna repair genes with prostate cancer plasma cell-free dna testing interference
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5161
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenkendal associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT konnickericq associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT schweizermichaelt associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT sokolovaalexandrao associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT grivaspetros associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT chengheatherh associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT klemfussnolam associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT beightolmallory associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT yuevany associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT nelsonpeters associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT montgomerybruce associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference
AT pritchardcolinc associationofclonalhematopoiesisindnarepairgeneswithprostatecancerplasmacellfreednatestinginterference