Cargando…

Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND: Age is an important and objective risk factor for upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. The accuracy of various age limits to detect upper GI malignancy is unclear. Determination of this accuracy may aid in the decision to refer symptomatic patients for upper GI endoscopy. The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Judith J., Lantinga, Marten A., Thijs, Ina M. E., de Reuver, Philip R., Drenth, Joost P. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820959225
_version_ 1783606699845746688
author de Jong, Judith J.
Lantinga, Marten A.
Thijs, Ina M. E.
de Reuver, Philip R.
Drenth, Joost P. H.
author_facet de Jong, Judith J.
Lantinga, Marten A.
Thijs, Ina M. E.
de Reuver, Philip R.
Drenth, Joost P. H.
author_sort de Jong, Judith J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Age is an important and objective risk factor for upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. The accuracy of various age limits to detect upper GI malignancy is unclear. Determination of this accuracy may aid in the decision to refer symptomatic patients for upper GI endoscopy. The aim of this analysis was to synthesize data on upper GI malignancy detection rates for various age limits worldwide through meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science in November 2018. Selection criteria included studies addressing malignant findings at upper GI endoscopy in a symptomatic population reporting age at time of diagnosis. Meta-analyses were conducted to derive continent-specific cancer detection rates. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies including 346,641 patients across 21 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. To detect >80% of malignant cases all symptomatic patients over 40 years of age should be investigated in Africa, over 50 years of age in South America and Asia, and over 55 years of age in North America and Europe. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides data on intercontinental variation in age at time of upper GI malignancy diagnosis in symptomatic patients referred for upper GI endoscopy. Guideline recommendations for age-based selection should be tailored to local age-related detection rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7645776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76457762020-11-17 Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy de Jong, Judith J. Lantinga, Marten A. Thijs, Ina M. E. de Reuver, Philip R. Drenth, Joost P. H. Therap Adv Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Age is an important and objective risk factor for upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. The accuracy of various age limits to detect upper GI malignancy is unclear. Determination of this accuracy may aid in the decision to refer symptomatic patients for upper GI endoscopy. The aim of this analysis was to synthesize data on upper GI malignancy detection rates for various age limits worldwide through meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science in November 2018. Selection criteria included studies addressing malignant findings at upper GI endoscopy in a symptomatic population reporting age at time of diagnosis. Meta-analyses were conducted to derive continent-specific cancer detection rates. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies including 346,641 patients across 21 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. To detect >80% of malignant cases all symptomatic patients over 40 years of age should be investigated in Africa, over 50 years of age in South America and Asia, and over 55 years of age in North America and Europe. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides data on intercontinental variation in age at time of upper GI malignancy diagnosis in symptomatic patients referred for upper GI endoscopy. Guideline recommendations for age-based selection should be tailored to local age-related detection rates. SAGE Publications 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7645776/ /pubmed/33209123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820959225 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
de Jong, Judith J.
Lantinga, Marten A.
Thijs, Ina M. E.
de Reuver, Philip R.
Drenth, Joost P. H.
Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820959225
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongjudithj systematicreviewwithmetaanalysisagerelatedmalignancydetectionratesatuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT lantingamartena systematicreviewwithmetaanalysisagerelatedmalignancydetectionratesatuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT thijsiname systematicreviewwithmetaanalysisagerelatedmalignancydetectionratesatuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT dereuverphilipr systematicreviewwithmetaanalysisagerelatedmalignancydetectionratesatuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT drenthjoostph systematicreviewwithmetaanalysisagerelatedmalignancydetectionratesatuppergastrointestinalendoscopy