Cargando…

Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine

Relationships between live body condition score (BCS) and carcass fat depots have not been well established in equine. Our study was designed to quantify the relationship between BCS and fat depot measurements from equine carcasses. Live horses (n = 429) were evaluated immediately prior to immobiliz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Lance A, Burrows, Amanda M, Nonella, Kelsey J, Pipkin, John L, Holmes, Logan D, McEvers, Trent J, Tennant, Travis C, Tisdale, Zane M, Voyles, Austin H, Lawrence, Ty E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa179
_version_ 1783606896654024704
author Baker, Lance A
Burrows, Amanda M
Nonella, Kelsey J
Pipkin, John L
Holmes, Logan D
McEvers, Trent J
Tennant, Travis C
Tisdale, Zane M
Voyles, Austin H
Lawrence, Ty E
author_facet Baker, Lance A
Burrows, Amanda M
Nonella, Kelsey J
Pipkin, John L
Holmes, Logan D
McEvers, Trent J
Tennant, Travis C
Tisdale, Zane M
Voyles, Austin H
Lawrence, Ty E
author_sort Baker, Lance A
collection PubMed
description Relationships between live body condition score (BCS) and carcass fat depots have not been well established in equine. Our study was designed to quantify the relationship between BCS and fat depot measurements from equine carcasses. Live horses (n = 429) were evaluated immediately prior to immobilization at a commercial equine processor. Horses were independently assigned a BCS by a panel of three trained evaluators; BCS was evaluated by visual appraisal and manual palpation of the neck, withers, back, ribs, behind the shoulder, and tailhead. Median BCS frequencies were: 3.0 (n = 9), 4.0 (n = 43), 5.0 (n = 116), 6.0 (n = 86), 7.0 (n = 72), 8.0 (n = 76), and 9.0 (n = 27). Sex (stallion [n = 5], mare [n = 159], or gelding [n = 114]) and breed type (draft [n = 56], stock [n = 363], pony [n = 8], or mule [n =3]) were also denoted. Horses were processed for human consumption according to industry-accepted procedures under the supervision of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. During the harvest process, all kidney–pelvic–heart (KPH) fat was trimmed from the carcass and weighed. After chilling, the marbling score was subjectively evaluated using beef grading standards. Carcass fat trim was weighed during the fabrication process. As BCS increased, hot carcass weight (HCW), absolute KPH weight, KPH expressed as a percentage of HCW, marbling score, neck fat depth, absolute weight of trimmed carcass fat, and trimmed carcass fat as a percentage of HCW increased (P < 0.01). A strong correlation (r = 0.74; P < 0.01) was detected between BCS and absolute KPH weight. Similarly, correlations between BCS and percentage of KPH (r = 0.65), neck fat depth (r = 0.60), absolute trimmed carcass fat (r = 0.58), trimmed carcass fat as a percentage of HCW (r = 0.54), marbling score (r = 0.54), and HCW (r = 0.52) were also detected (P < 0.01). These data indicate a strong relationship between subjective live BCS and objectively measured carcass fat depots in various equine breed types and sexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76473472020-11-12 Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine Baker, Lance A Burrows, Amanda M Nonella, Kelsey J Pipkin, John L Holmes, Logan D McEvers, Trent J Tennant, Travis C Tisdale, Zane M Voyles, Austin H Lawrence, Ty E Transl Anim Sci Growth Biology Relationships between live body condition score (BCS) and carcass fat depots have not been well established in equine. Our study was designed to quantify the relationship between BCS and fat depot measurements from equine carcasses. Live horses (n = 429) were evaluated immediately prior to immobilization at a commercial equine processor. Horses were independently assigned a BCS by a panel of three trained evaluators; BCS was evaluated by visual appraisal and manual palpation of the neck, withers, back, ribs, behind the shoulder, and tailhead. Median BCS frequencies were: 3.0 (n = 9), 4.0 (n = 43), 5.0 (n = 116), 6.0 (n = 86), 7.0 (n = 72), 8.0 (n = 76), and 9.0 (n = 27). Sex (stallion [n = 5], mare [n = 159], or gelding [n = 114]) and breed type (draft [n = 56], stock [n = 363], pony [n = 8], or mule [n =3]) were also denoted. Horses were processed for human consumption according to industry-accepted procedures under the supervision of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. During the harvest process, all kidney–pelvic–heart (KPH) fat was trimmed from the carcass and weighed. After chilling, the marbling score was subjectively evaluated using beef grading standards. Carcass fat trim was weighed during the fabrication process. As BCS increased, hot carcass weight (HCW), absolute KPH weight, KPH expressed as a percentage of HCW, marbling score, neck fat depth, absolute weight of trimmed carcass fat, and trimmed carcass fat as a percentage of HCW increased (P < 0.01). A strong correlation (r = 0.74; P < 0.01) was detected between BCS and absolute KPH weight. Similarly, correlations between BCS and percentage of KPH (r = 0.65), neck fat depth (r = 0.60), absolute trimmed carcass fat (r = 0.58), trimmed carcass fat as a percentage of HCW (r = 0.54), marbling score (r = 0.54), and HCW (r = 0.52) were also detected (P < 0.01). These data indicate a strong relationship between subjective live BCS and objectively measured carcass fat depots in various equine breed types and sexes. Oxford University Press 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7647347/ /pubmed/33196015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa179 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Growth Biology
Baker, Lance A
Burrows, Amanda M
Nonella, Kelsey J
Pipkin, John L
Holmes, Logan D
McEvers, Trent J
Tennant, Travis C
Tisdale, Zane M
Voyles, Austin H
Lawrence, Ty E
Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title_full Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title_fullStr Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title_short Relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
title_sort relationship between live body condition score and carcass fat measures in equine
topic Growth Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa179
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerlancea relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT burrowsamandam relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT nonellakelseyj relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT pipkinjohnl relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT holmeslogand relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT mceverstrentj relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT tennanttravisc relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT tisdalezanem relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT voylesaustinh relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine
AT lawrencetye relationshipbetweenlivebodyconditionscoreandcarcassfatmeasuresinequine