Cargando…

The Shape of Posterior Sclera as a Biometric Signature in Open-angle Glaucoma: An Intereye Comparison Study

PURPOSE: To characterize intereye differences in posterior segment parameters and determine their significance in open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral damage. METHODS: Both eyes from 65 subjects without any nerve damage and 43 patients undergoing treatment for unilateral open-angle glaucoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yong Chan, Koo, Yong Ho, Bin Hwang, Hyung, Kang, Kui Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001573
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To characterize intereye differences in posterior segment parameters and determine their significance in open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral damage. METHODS: Both eyes from 65 subjects without any nerve damage and 43 patients undergoing treatment for unilateral open-angle glaucoma were included in this study. A 12.0×9.0×2.6 mm volume of the posterior segment in each eye was scanned with swept-source optical coherence tomography. Coronally reconstructed optical coherence tomography images were analyzed to determine the deepest point of the eye (DPE), which we then calculated the distance (Disc-DPE distance), depth (Disc-DPE depth), angle (Disc-DPE angle) from the optic disc center to the DPE. Posterior pole shape was analyzed measuring the posterior pole-cross-sectional area, posterior pole-horizontal width (PP-HW), and posterior pole-vertical width) of the posterior pole. These measurements and their intereye absolute difference (IAD; absolute difference in measurements between the right and left eyes) values were compared between the healthy and unilateral glaucomatous patients. RESULTS: The posterior sclera measurements, including the Disc-DPE distance, Disc-DPE depth, and posterior pole-cross-sectional area, were significantly different between the unilateral glaucoma eyes and contralateral healthy eyes (P=0.043, P=0.035, and P=0.049, respectively). By contrast, none of the intereye differences in optic nerve head parameters were significant in the unilateral glaucoma patients. In comparison with the IAD values, the baseline intraocular pressure and PP-HW of the posterior segment showed significant differences between the healthy and the unilateral glaucoma patients (P=0.019 and P=0.036, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed that a larger baseline intraocular pressure IAD [odds ratio (OR), 1.381; P=0.009)] and larger PP-HW IAD (OR, 1.324; P=0.032) were significantly associated with the presence of glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the fellow healthy eyes, glaucomatous eyes had larger and more steeply curved posterior poles, which represent a structural variation of the posterior sclera that might be associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy.