Cargando…

Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report

INTRODUCTION: Contracture of dacryocyst by an implanted lacrimal silicone tube is rare. This report describes a unique case of secondary dacryocystitis and the contracture of dacryocyst caused by a lacrimal silicone tube that was placed in the lacrimal system for 10 years. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 63-yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Lanjian, Lai, Zhaoguang, Huang, Wei, Xu, Fan, Wu, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023073
_version_ 1783606937770786816
author Li, Lanjian
Lai, Zhaoguang
Huang, Wei
Xu, Fan
Wu, Yu
author_facet Li, Lanjian
Lai, Zhaoguang
Huang, Wei
Xu, Fan
Wu, Yu
author_sort Li, Lanjian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Contracture of dacryocyst by an implanted lacrimal silicone tube is rare. This report describes a unique case of secondary dacryocystitis and the contracture of dacryocyst caused by a lacrimal silicone tube that was placed in the lacrimal system for 10 years. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 63-year-old female was diagnosed with chronic dacryocystitis at a local hospital and underwent surgical treatment 10 years ago. In the past month, the patient complained of persistent tearing and purulent secretion from the eyes. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with secondary dacryocystitis, based on clinical features and the presence of the silicone stent, granulation tissue formation, and dacryocyst contracture in the lacrimal duct, as observed by nasal endoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: For treatment, the implanted silicone tube in the patient was removed, the lacrimal duct and nasal mucosa was anastomosed, and a new lacrimal silicone tube was placed again. OUTCOMES: Following the surgery, the patient recounted that there were no symptoms, and follow-up examinations performed over a 1-month period posttreatment revealed no recurrence of obstruction or dacryocystitis. Therefore, the surgeon removed the lacrimal drainage tube and asked the patient to return to the outpatient department regularly for examination. CONCLUSION: The findings, in this case, suggest that silicone tubes are safe and effective, and can be placed in the lacrimal drainage system. However, in this patient, prolonged intubation caused chronic inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and dacryocyst contracture. Our findings could inform surgeons to consider the reasonable duration of intubation for treating cases of lacrimal obstruction, in order to avoid unnecessary complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76475712020-11-09 Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report Li, Lanjian Lai, Zhaoguang Huang, Wei Xu, Fan Wu, Yu Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 INTRODUCTION: Contracture of dacryocyst by an implanted lacrimal silicone tube is rare. This report describes a unique case of secondary dacryocystitis and the contracture of dacryocyst caused by a lacrimal silicone tube that was placed in the lacrimal system for 10 years. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 63-year-old female was diagnosed with chronic dacryocystitis at a local hospital and underwent surgical treatment 10 years ago. In the past month, the patient complained of persistent tearing and purulent secretion from the eyes. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with secondary dacryocystitis, based on clinical features and the presence of the silicone stent, granulation tissue formation, and dacryocyst contracture in the lacrimal duct, as observed by nasal endoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: For treatment, the implanted silicone tube in the patient was removed, the lacrimal duct and nasal mucosa was anastomosed, and a new lacrimal silicone tube was placed again. OUTCOMES: Following the surgery, the patient recounted that there were no symptoms, and follow-up examinations performed over a 1-month period posttreatment revealed no recurrence of obstruction or dacryocystitis. Therefore, the surgeon removed the lacrimal drainage tube and asked the patient to return to the outpatient department regularly for examination. CONCLUSION: The findings, in this case, suggest that silicone tubes are safe and effective, and can be placed in the lacrimal drainage system. However, in this patient, prolonged intubation caused chronic inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and dacryocyst contracture. Our findings could inform surgeons to consider the reasonable duration of intubation for treating cases of lacrimal obstruction, in order to avoid unnecessary complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7647571/ /pubmed/33157970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023073 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5800
Li, Lanjian
Lai, Zhaoguang
Huang, Wei
Xu, Fan
Wu, Yu
Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title_full Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title_fullStr Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title_short Dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: A case report
title_sort dacryocystitis secondary to neglected silicone tube in lacrimal duct for 10 years: a case report
topic 5800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023073
work_keys_str_mv AT lilanjian dacryocystitissecondarytoneglectedsiliconetubeinlacrimalductfor10yearsacasereport
AT laizhaoguang dacryocystitissecondarytoneglectedsiliconetubeinlacrimalductfor10yearsacasereport
AT huangwei dacryocystitissecondarytoneglectedsiliconetubeinlacrimalductfor10yearsacasereport
AT xufan dacryocystitissecondarytoneglectedsiliconetubeinlacrimalductfor10yearsacasereport
AT wuyu dacryocystitissecondarytoneglectedsiliconetubeinlacrimalductfor10yearsacasereport