Cargando…

Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the safety and efficacy of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treating myopia have yielded inconsistent results. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to clarify this issue METHODS: Various databases were conducted up to Novembe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kai-Ping, Fang, Xiang, Zhang, Yin, Chao, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021563
_version_ 1783606949611307008
author Zhang, Kai-Ping
Fang, Xiang
Zhang, Yin
Chao, Min
author_facet Zhang, Kai-Ping
Fang, Xiang
Zhang, Yin
Chao, Min
author_sort Zhang, Kai-Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the safety and efficacy of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treating myopia have yielded inconsistent results. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to clarify this issue METHODS: Various databases were conducted up to November 21, 2018. All randomized controlled trials and cohorts that compared Q-value-guided LASIK with standard LASIK were selected. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlations. Additionally, different subgroup analyses and publication bias tests were performed. Data were extracted including the number of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, postoperative UCVA, preoperative and postoperative Q-value, postoperative refractive spherical equivalent (SE), the number of postoperative SE within ±0.5D, higher order aberration (HOA), coma-like aberration and spherical-like aberration. RESULTS: A total of seventeen studies with 2640 patients and 3,358 eyes were included. It has been shown that postoperative Q-value (MD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.64, -0.21; P < .001), HOA (MD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.23, -0.06; P = .001), spherical-like aberration (MD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.06; P = .004) rather than postoperative UCVA (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.07; P = .012) were significantly better in the Q-value-guided LASIK than standard LASIK. However, the pooled results revealed that no significant differences were found between the 2 paired groups of postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.92; P = .763), preoperative Q-value (MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.02; P = .922), postoperative refractive SE (MD = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.25; P = .336), coma-like aberration (horizontal: MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.03; P = .966; vertical: MD = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.01; P = .263) and postoperative SE within ±0.5 D (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.48, 2.33; P = .886). Likewise, similar results were detected in some corresponding subgroups. CONCLUSION: Q-value-guided LASIK is a safe, effective and predictable surgical option for treating myopia, especially showing superiority over standard LASIK in postoperative Q-value, HOA and spherical-like aberration. However, more detailed studies are required to confirm our conclusions in advanced researches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76476222020-11-09 Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis Zhang, Kai-Ping Fang, Xiang Zhang, Yin Chao, Min Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the safety and efficacy of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treating myopia have yielded inconsistent results. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to clarify this issue METHODS: Various databases were conducted up to November 21, 2018. All randomized controlled trials and cohorts that compared Q-value-guided LASIK with standard LASIK were selected. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlations. Additionally, different subgroup analyses and publication bias tests were performed. Data were extracted including the number of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, postoperative UCVA, preoperative and postoperative Q-value, postoperative refractive spherical equivalent (SE), the number of postoperative SE within ±0.5D, higher order aberration (HOA), coma-like aberration and spherical-like aberration. RESULTS: A total of seventeen studies with 2640 patients and 3,358 eyes were included. It has been shown that postoperative Q-value (MD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.64, -0.21; P < .001), HOA (MD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.23, -0.06; P = .001), spherical-like aberration (MD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.06; P = .004) rather than postoperative UCVA (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.07; P = .012) were significantly better in the Q-value-guided LASIK than standard LASIK. However, the pooled results revealed that no significant differences were found between the 2 paired groups of postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.92; P = .763), preoperative Q-value (MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.02; P = .922), postoperative refractive SE (MD = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.25; P = .336), coma-like aberration (horizontal: MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.03; P = .966; vertical: MD = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.01; P = .263) and postoperative SE within ±0.5 D (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.48, 2.33; P = .886). Likewise, similar results were detected in some corresponding subgroups. CONCLUSION: Q-value-guided LASIK is a safe, effective and predictable surgical option for treating myopia, especially showing superiority over standard LASIK in postoperative Q-value, HOA and spherical-like aberration. However, more detailed studies are required to confirm our conclusions in advanced researches. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7647622/ /pubmed/33157908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021563 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3700
Zhang, Kai-Ping
Fang, Xiang
Zhang, Yin
Chao, Min
Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: a meta-analysis
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021563
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkaiping comparisonofqvalueguidedlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisandstandardlaserinsitukeratomileusisformyopiaametaanalysis
AT fangxiang comparisonofqvalueguidedlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisandstandardlaserinsitukeratomileusisformyopiaametaanalysis
AT zhangyin comparisonofqvalueguidedlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisandstandardlaserinsitukeratomileusisformyopiaametaanalysis
AT chaomin comparisonofqvalueguidedlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusisandstandardlaserinsitukeratomileusisformyopiaametaanalysis