Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Dental biofilm accumulation and poor personal oral hygiene are known major risk factors for gingivitis and halitosis. However, it is not clear how studies compare the effectiveness of hygiene regimens, associated with outcomes centered on patients. METHODS: A randomized, blind, controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moriyama, Caroline Moraes, Santos, Elaine Marcílio, Gonçalves, Marcela Leticia Leal, Tubel, Carlos Alberto, da Silva, Matheus Pereira, Nascimento, Victor Augusto Whately, Teixeira, Victor Perez, Sobral, Ana Paula Taboada, Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini, Motta, Lara Jansiski, de Paula, Eloisa Andrade, Magalhães, Gabriela Traldi Zaffalon de Almeida, Magalhães, José Cassio de Almeida, Deana, Alessandro Melo, Sakiyama, Kylze Ikegami, Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023092
_version_ 1783606949849333760
author Moriyama, Caroline Moraes
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Gonçalves, Marcela Leticia Leal
Tubel, Carlos Alberto
da Silva, Matheus Pereira
Nascimento, Victor Augusto Whately
Teixeira, Victor Perez
Sobral, Ana Paula Taboada
Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini
Motta, Lara Jansiski
de Paula, Eloisa Andrade
Magalhães, Gabriela Traldi Zaffalon de Almeida
Magalhães, José Cassio de Almeida
Deana, Alessandro Melo
Sakiyama, Kylze Ikegami
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
author_facet Moriyama, Caroline Moraes
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Gonçalves, Marcela Leticia Leal
Tubel, Carlos Alberto
da Silva, Matheus Pereira
Nascimento, Victor Augusto Whately
Teixeira, Victor Perez
Sobral, Ana Paula Taboada
Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini
Motta, Lara Jansiski
de Paula, Eloisa Andrade
Magalhães, Gabriela Traldi Zaffalon de Almeida
Magalhães, José Cassio de Almeida
Deana, Alessandro Melo
Sakiyama, Kylze Ikegami
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
author_sort Moriyama, Caroline Moraes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental biofilm accumulation and poor personal oral hygiene are known major risk factors for gingivitis and halitosis. However, it is not clear how studies compare the effectiveness of hygiene regimens, associated with outcomes centered on patients. METHODS: A randomized, blind, controlled clinical trial involving 58 participants aged from 12 to 17 years, who search the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, will be conducted. Immediately, the volunteers will be inserted into Group 1 (commercially available hygiene regimen) or Group 2 (tooth brushing alone). In Group 1, participants will receive Colgate Total 12 toothpastes, Plax mouthwashes and Colgate Ultrasoft toothbrushes, while Group 2 will use Colgate Cavity Protection toothpastes and Colgate Ultrasoft toothbrushes. The interventions will be conducted in the periods of 1, 3, and 6 months after the baseline, when the evaluations will also be performed. Biofilm and halitosis indexes will be evaluated. Data regarding discomfort, satisfaction and the socioeconomic/individual characteristics will also be computed. DISCUSSION: Although toothbrushing has shown positive effects in decreasing biofilm and in gingival health, there is no comparison in the literature of different brushing regimens with halitosis measurement in adolescents. In addition, the effectiveness of these protocols would be confirmed from the acceptability of the volunteers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76476232020-11-09 Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial Moriyama, Caroline Moraes Santos, Elaine Marcílio Gonçalves, Marcela Leticia Leal Tubel, Carlos Alberto da Silva, Matheus Pereira Nascimento, Victor Augusto Whately Teixeira, Victor Perez Sobral, Ana Paula Taboada Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Motta, Lara Jansiski de Paula, Eloisa Andrade Magalhães, Gabriela Traldi Zaffalon de Almeida Magalhães, José Cassio de Almeida Deana, Alessandro Melo Sakiyama, Kylze Ikegami Bussadori, Sandra Kalil Medicine (Baltimore) 5900 BACKGROUND: Dental biofilm accumulation and poor personal oral hygiene are known major risk factors for gingivitis and halitosis. However, it is not clear how studies compare the effectiveness of hygiene regimens, associated with outcomes centered on patients. METHODS: A randomized, blind, controlled clinical trial involving 58 participants aged from 12 to 17 years, who search the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, will be conducted. Immediately, the volunteers will be inserted into Group 1 (commercially available hygiene regimen) or Group 2 (tooth brushing alone). In Group 1, participants will receive Colgate Total 12 toothpastes, Plax mouthwashes and Colgate Ultrasoft toothbrushes, while Group 2 will use Colgate Cavity Protection toothpastes and Colgate Ultrasoft toothbrushes. The interventions will be conducted in the periods of 1, 3, and 6 months after the baseline, when the evaluations will also be performed. Biofilm and halitosis indexes will be evaluated. Data regarding discomfort, satisfaction and the socioeconomic/individual characteristics will also be computed. DISCUSSION: Although toothbrushing has shown positive effects in decreasing biofilm and in gingival health, there is no comparison in the literature of different brushing regimens with halitosis measurement in adolescents. In addition, the effectiveness of these protocols would be confirmed from the acceptability of the volunteers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7647623/ /pubmed/33157981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023092 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5900
Moriyama, Caroline Moraes
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Gonçalves, Marcela Leticia Leal
Tubel, Carlos Alberto
da Silva, Matheus Pereira
Nascimento, Victor Augusto Whately
Teixeira, Victor Perez
Sobral, Ana Paula Taboada
Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini
Motta, Lara Jansiski
de Paula, Eloisa Andrade
Magalhães, Gabriela Traldi Zaffalon de Almeida
Magalhães, José Cassio de Almeida
Deana, Alessandro Melo
Sakiyama, Kylze Ikegami
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of a commercially available regimen vs brushing alone on established plaque and gingivitis on adolescents: study protocol for a randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial
topic 5900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023092
work_keys_str_mv AT moriyamacarolinemoraes evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT santoselainemarcilio evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT goncalvesmarcelaleticialeal evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT tubelcarlosalberto evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT dasilvamatheuspereira evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT nascimentovictoraugustowhately evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT teixeiravictorperez evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT sobralanapaulataboada evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT horlianaannacarolinarattotempestini evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT mottalarajansiski evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT depaulaeloisaandrade evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT magalhaesgabrielatraldizaffalondealmeida evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT magalhaesjosecassiodealmeida evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT deanaalessandromelo evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT sakiyamakylzeikegami evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial
AT bussadorisandrakalil evaluationoftheefficacyofacommerciallyavailableregimenvsbrushingaloneonestablishedplaqueandgingivitisonadolescentsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledblindclinicaltrial