Cargando…
Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retr...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162 |
_version_ | 1783606952917467136 |
---|---|
author | Swanson, Eric |
author_facet | Swanson, Eric |
author_sort | Swanson, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort study was undertaken among 100 patients who underwent a subsuperficial musculoaponeurotic system facelift with (n = 61) or without (n = 39) simultaneous malar fat injection. Rigorously standardized photographs were obtained 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, including oblique photographs with the nasion aligned with the far inner canthus. Malar projection and area were measured with the assistance of a computer imaging software. RESULTS: Fat injection produced a significant (P < 0.001) increase in right and left malar projection. The mean increase in projection was 3 mm, significantly greater than control patients, who also demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) but more modest (<1 mm) increase. Malar projection was significantly correlated with the fat injection volume (P ≤ 0.001). The increase was sustained at follow-up times up to 6 months, and 1 year in a smaller patient cohort (n = 44), with no evidence of a decline or rebound. The calculated fat retention was 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Fat injection at the time of a facelift effectively adds malar volume, and this increase is sustained at time points up to 1 year after surgery, consistent with the cell survival theory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7647636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76476362020-11-09 Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection Swanson, Eric Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort study was undertaken among 100 patients who underwent a subsuperficial musculoaponeurotic system facelift with (n = 61) or without (n = 39) simultaneous malar fat injection. Rigorously standardized photographs were obtained 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, including oblique photographs with the nasion aligned with the far inner canthus. Malar projection and area were measured with the assistance of a computer imaging software. RESULTS: Fat injection produced a significant (P < 0.001) increase in right and left malar projection. The mean increase in projection was 3 mm, significantly greater than control patients, who also demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) but more modest (<1 mm) increase. Malar projection was significantly correlated with the fat injection volume (P ≤ 0.001). The increase was sustained at follow-up times up to 6 months, and 1 year in a smaller patient cohort (n = 44), with no evidence of a decline or rebound. The calculated fat retention was 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Fat injection at the time of a facelift effectively adds malar volume, and this increase is sustained at time points up to 1 year after surgery, consistent with the cell survival theory. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7647636/ /pubmed/33173678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic Swanson, Eric Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title | Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title_full | Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title_fullStr | Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title_short | Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection |
title_sort | photographic comparison of malar projection in 100 facelift patients treated with and without fat injection |
topic | Cosmetic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swansoneric photographiccomparisonofmalarprojectionin100faceliftpatientstreatedwithandwithoutfatinjection |