Cargando…

Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection

Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Swanson, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162
_version_ 1783606952917467136
author Swanson, Eric
author_facet Swanson, Eric
author_sort Swanson, Eric
collection PubMed
description Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort study was undertaken among 100 patients who underwent a subsuperficial musculoaponeurotic system facelift with (n = 61) or without (n = 39) simultaneous malar fat injection. Rigorously standardized photographs were obtained 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, including oblique photographs with the nasion aligned with the far inner canthus. Malar projection and area were measured with the assistance of a computer imaging software. RESULTS: Fat injection produced a significant (P < 0.001) increase in right and left malar projection. The mean increase in projection was 3 mm, significantly greater than control patients, who also demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) but more modest (<1 mm) increase. Malar projection was significantly correlated with the fat injection volume (P ≤ 0.001). The increase was sustained at follow-up times up to 6 months, and 1 year in a smaller patient cohort (n = 44), with no evidence of a decline or rebound. The calculated fat retention was 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Fat injection at the time of a facelift effectively adds malar volume, and this increase is sustained at time points up to 1 year after surgery, consistent with the cell survival theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76476362020-11-09 Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection Swanson, Eric Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic Facelifts are frequently combined with fat injection to restore volume. However, the efficacy of simultaneous fat grafting has not been objectively evaluated in a large number of patients that includes a control group. This study was undertaken to fill this gap in our knowledge base. METHODS: A retrospective comparative cohort study was undertaken among 100 patients who underwent a subsuperficial musculoaponeurotic system facelift with (n = 61) or without (n = 39) simultaneous malar fat injection. Rigorously standardized photographs were obtained 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, including oblique photographs with the nasion aligned with the far inner canthus. Malar projection and area were measured with the assistance of a computer imaging software. RESULTS: Fat injection produced a significant (P < 0.001) increase in right and left malar projection. The mean increase in projection was 3 mm, significantly greater than control patients, who also demonstrated a significant (P < 0.001) but more modest (<1 mm) increase. Malar projection was significantly correlated with the fat injection volume (P ≤ 0.001). The increase was sustained at follow-up times up to 6 months, and 1 year in a smaller patient cohort (n = 44), with no evidence of a decline or rebound. The calculated fat retention was 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Fat injection at the time of a facelift effectively adds malar volume, and this increase is sustained at time points up to 1 year after surgery, consistent with the cell survival theory. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7647636/ /pubmed/33173678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Swanson, Eric
Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title_full Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title_fullStr Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title_full_unstemmed Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title_short Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection
title_sort photographic comparison of malar projection in 100 facelift patients treated with and without fat injection
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003162
work_keys_str_mv AT swansoneric photographiccomparisonofmalarprojectionin100faceliftpatientstreatedwithandwithoutfatinjection