Cargando…
A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers
Introduction We aimed to characterize the most influential radiation oncologists on Twitter, the correlation between their Twitter activity and their academic profiles as measured by the Scopus H-index as well as their activity around the American Society for Radiation Oncologists (ASTRO) 2018 meeti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173644 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10838 |
_version_ | 1783606992254795776 |
---|---|
author | Beroual, Sharifa Shah, Chirag Knoll, Miriam Bahig, Houda Lambert, Carole Taussky, Daniel |
author_facet | Beroual, Sharifa Shah, Chirag Knoll, Miriam Bahig, Houda Lambert, Carole Taussky, Daniel |
author_sort | Beroual, Sharifa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction We aimed to characterize the most influential radiation oncologists on Twitter, the correlation between their Twitter activity and their academic profiles as measured by the Scopus H-index as well as their activity around the American Society for Radiation Oncologists (ASTRO) 2018 meeting. Methods We defined radiation oncology influencers as any radiation oncologist with 500 or more followers on Twitter through the first two weeks of August 2019. We collected their available characteristics, their Scopus H-index, and Twitter metrics. We examined their general Twitter activity as well as their specific activity before, during, and after the 2018 ASTRO annual meeting. We identified the most frequent tweet content categories for each influencer. Results We identified 48 radiation oncologist influencers; 79% were male, 75% were based in the United States, and 94% were affiliated with an academic center. Among them, 44% had high H-indices of ≥21, an average value in academic faculty for full professors or department heads. There were no correlations between H-index and Twitter metrics such as the number of individuals the influencer was following (p = 0.58), the number of followers (p = 0.66), the number of tweets (p = 0.88), and the number of likes (p = 0.54). During the period around ASTRO 2018, the mean number of tweets per influencer was 4437 (range 87-93,000). Conclusion Current radiation oncology influencers are predominantly North American males from academic institutions. A correlation between academic productivity as measured by the H-index and Twitter metrics was not demonstrated. The fact that some influencers had a low H-index supports that a high academic profile as measured by traditional metrics is not necessary to have a voice in the Twitter radiation oncology community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7647836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76478362020-11-09 A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers Beroual, Sharifa Shah, Chirag Knoll, Miriam Bahig, Houda Lambert, Carole Taussky, Daniel Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction We aimed to characterize the most influential radiation oncologists on Twitter, the correlation between their Twitter activity and their academic profiles as measured by the Scopus H-index as well as their activity around the American Society for Radiation Oncologists (ASTRO) 2018 meeting. Methods We defined radiation oncology influencers as any radiation oncologist with 500 or more followers on Twitter through the first two weeks of August 2019. We collected their available characteristics, their Scopus H-index, and Twitter metrics. We examined their general Twitter activity as well as their specific activity before, during, and after the 2018 ASTRO annual meeting. We identified the most frequent tweet content categories for each influencer. Results We identified 48 radiation oncologist influencers; 79% were male, 75% were based in the United States, and 94% were affiliated with an academic center. Among them, 44% had high H-indices of ≥21, an average value in academic faculty for full professors or department heads. There were no correlations between H-index and Twitter metrics such as the number of individuals the influencer was following (p = 0.58), the number of followers (p = 0.66), the number of tweets (p = 0.88), and the number of likes (p = 0.54). During the period around ASTRO 2018, the mean number of tweets per influencer was 4437 (range 87-93,000). Conclusion Current radiation oncology influencers are predominantly North American males from academic institutions. A correlation between academic productivity as measured by the H-index and Twitter metrics was not demonstrated. The fact that some influencers had a low H-index supports that a high academic profile as measured by traditional metrics is not necessary to have a voice in the Twitter radiation oncology community. Cureus 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7647836/ /pubmed/33173644 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10838 Text en Copyright © 2020, Beroual et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Beroual, Sharifa Shah, Chirag Knoll, Miriam Bahig, Houda Lambert, Carole Taussky, Daniel A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title | A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title_full | A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title_fullStr | A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title_full_unstemmed | A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title_short | A Portrait of Current Radiation Oncology Twitter Influencers |
title_sort | portrait of current radiation oncology twitter influencers |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173644 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beroualsharifa aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT shahchirag aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT knollmiriam aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT bahighouda aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT lambertcarole aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT tausskydaniel aportraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT beroualsharifa portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT shahchirag portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT knollmiriam portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT bahighouda portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT lambertcarole portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers AT tausskydaniel portraitofcurrentradiationoncologytwitterinfluencers |