Cargando…

The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions

Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mönch, Julia, Rauch, Elke, Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina, Erhard, Michael, Wolff, Inga, Schmidt, Paul, Schug, Angela R., Louton, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030
_version_ 1783606998561980416
author Mönch, Julia
Rauch, Elke
Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina
Erhard, Michael
Wolff, Inga
Schmidt, Paul
Schug, Angela R.
Louton, Helen
author_facet Mönch, Julia
Rauch, Elke
Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina
Erhard, Michael
Wolff, Inga
Schmidt, Paul
Schug, Angela R.
Louton, Helen
author_sort Mönch, Julia
collection PubMed
description Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the mechanical loading (MECH). We assessed the injuries of broilers of 12 MAN and 12 MECH flocks on-farm before and immediately after loading, documented the numbers of broilers dead on arrival reported by the processing plant, and assessed the circumstances at loading. A smaller number of broilers with a hematoma (≥0.5 cm in diameter) on the wing were observed after MAN compared with MECH using the examined harvester (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.28). The number of broilers with severe wing injuries did not differ between the loading methods. The number of broilers dead on arrival was greater in mechanically loaded flocks (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.68), but lower than in comparable studies. We observed a lower average stocking rate than targeted in the drawers of MECH containers, most likely because the used harvester can adapt to short-term changes in weight and adjust the stocking rate during the loading process. A longer total loading duration in MAN was associated with an increase of wing hematomas, and the involvement of more working people per 10,000 broilers during MAN was associated with a lower occurrence of hematomas. The total loading duration in MECH had no notable influence on the occurrence of injuries. Physical conditions of the involved personnel might play a larger role in MAN than in MECH. The harvester that was examined should be further developed to reduce the occurrence of hematomas. Our results indicate that the choice of loading method alone does not determine the injury risk, and multiple factors are associated with broiler welfare during loading. It is important that the chosen method is performed under the most adequate conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76478652020-11-16 The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions Mönch, Julia Rauch, Elke Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina Erhard, Michael Wolff, Inga Schmidt, Paul Schug, Angela R. Louton, Helen Poult Sci Animal Well-Being and Behavior Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the mechanical loading (MECH). We assessed the injuries of broilers of 12 MAN and 12 MECH flocks on-farm before and immediately after loading, documented the numbers of broilers dead on arrival reported by the processing plant, and assessed the circumstances at loading. A smaller number of broilers with a hematoma (≥0.5 cm in diameter) on the wing were observed after MAN compared with MECH using the examined harvester (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.28). The number of broilers with severe wing injuries did not differ between the loading methods. The number of broilers dead on arrival was greater in mechanically loaded flocks (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.68), but lower than in comparable studies. We observed a lower average stocking rate than targeted in the drawers of MECH containers, most likely because the used harvester can adapt to short-term changes in weight and adjust the stocking rate during the loading process. A longer total loading duration in MAN was associated with an increase of wing hematomas, and the involvement of more working people per 10,000 broilers during MAN was associated with a lower occurrence of hematomas. The total loading duration in MECH had no notable influence on the occurrence of injuries. Physical conditions of the involved personnel might play a larger role in MAN than in MECH. The harvester that was examined should be further developed to reduce the occurrence of hematomas. Our results indicate that the choice of loading method alone does not determine the injury risk, and multiple factors are associated with broiler welfare during loading. It is important that the chosen method is performed under the most adequate conditions. Elsevier 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7647865/ /pubmed/33142439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Animal Well-Being and Behavior
Mönch, Julia
Rauch, Elke
Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina
Erhard, Michael
Wolff, Inga
Schmidt, Paul
Schug, Angela R.
Louton, Helen
The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title_full The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title_fullStr The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title_full_unstemmed The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title_short The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
title_sort welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
topic Animal Well-Being and Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030
work_keys_str_mv AT monchjulia thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT rauchelke thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT hartmannsgrubersandrina thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT erhardmichael thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT wolffinga thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT schmidtpaul thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT schugangelar thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT loutonhelen thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT monchjulia welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT rauchelke welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT hartmannsgrubersandrina welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT erhardmichael welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT wolffinga welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT schmidtpaul welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT schugangelar welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions
AT loutonhelen welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions