Cargando…
The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions
Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030 |
_version_ | 1783606998561980416 |
---|---|
author | Mönch, Julia Rauch, Elke Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina Erhard, Michael Wolff, Inga Schmidt, Paul Schug, Angela R. Louton, Helen |
author_facet | Mönch, Julia Rauch, Elke Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina Erhard, Michael Wolff, Inga Schmidt, Paul Schug, Angela R. Louton, Helen |
author_sort | Mönch, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the mechanical loading (MECH). We assessed the injuries of broilers of 12 MAN and 12 MECH flocks on-farm before and immediately after loading, documented the numbers of broilers dead on arrival reported by the processing plant, and assessed the circumstances at loading. A smaller number of broilers with a hematoma (≥0.5 cm in diameter) on the wing were observed after MAN compared with MECH using the examined harvester (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.28). The number of broilers with severe wing injuries did not differ between the loading methods. The number of broilers dead on arrival was greater in mechanically loaded flocks (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.68), but lower than in comparable studies. We observed a lower average stocking rate than targeted in the drawers of MECH containers, most likely because the used harvester can adapt to short-term changes in weight and adjust the stocking rate during the loading process. A longer total loading duration in MAN was associated with an increase of wing hematomas, and the involvement of more working people per 10,000 broilers during MAN was associated with a lower occurrence of hematomas. The total loading duration in MECH had no notable influence on the occurrence of injuries. Physical conditions of the involved personnel might play a larger role in MAN than in MECH. The harvester that was examined should be further developed to reduce the occurrence of hematomas. Our results indicate that the choice of loading method alone does not determine the injury risk, and multiple factors are associated with broiler welfare during loading. It is important that the chosen method is performed under the most adequate conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7647865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76478652020-11-16 The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions Mönch, Julia Rauch, Elke Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina Erhard, Michael Wolff, Inga Schmidt, Paul Schug, Angela R. Louton, Helen Poult Sci Animal Well-Being and Behavior Loading of broilers for transport to the processing plant poses a notable injury risk for broilers. Therefore, the poultry industry has developed mechanical methods as alternatives to manual loading methods. Our objective in the present study was to compare manual loading (MAN) of broilers with the mechanical loading (MECH). We assessed the injuries of broilers of 12 MAN and 12 MECH flocks on-farm before and immediately after loading, documented the numbers of broilers dead on arrival reported by the processing plant, and assessed the circumstances at loading. A smaller number of broilers with a hematoma (≥0.5 cm in diameter) on the wing were observed after MAN compared with MECH using the examined harvester (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.28). The number of broilers with severe wing injuries did not differ between the loading methods. The number of broilers dead on arrival was greater in mechanically loaded flocks (MAN vs. MECH odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.68), but lower than in comparable studies. We observed a lower average stocking rate than targeted in the drawers of MECH containers, most likely because the used harvester can adapt to short-term changes in weight and adjust the stocking rate during the loading process. A longer total loading duration in MAN was associated with an increase of wing hematomas, and the involvement of more working people per 10,000 broilers during MAN was associated with a lower occurrence of hematomas. The total loading duration in MECH had no notable influence on the occurrence of injuries. Physical conditions of the involved personnel might play a larger role in MAN than in MECH. The harvester that was examined should be further developed to reduce the occurrence of hematomas. Our results indicate that the choice of loading method alone does not determine the injury risk, and multiple factors are associated with broiler welfare during loading. It is important that the chosen method is performed under the most adequate conditions. Elsevier 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7647865/ /pubmed/33142439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Animal Well-Being and Behavior Mönch, Julia Rauch, Elke Hartmannsgruber, Sandrina Erhard, Michael Wolff, Inga Schmidt, Paul Schug, Angela R. Louton, Helen The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title | The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title_full | The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title_fullStr | The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title_short | The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
title_sort | welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions |
topic | Animal Well-Being and Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monchjulia thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT rauchelke thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT hartmannsgrubersandrina thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT erhardmichael thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT wolffinga thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT schmidtpaul thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT schugangelar thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT loutonhelen thewelfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT monchjulia welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT rauchelke welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT hartmannsgrubersandrina welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT erhardmichael welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT wolffinga welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT schmidtpaul welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT schugangelar welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions AT loutonhelen welfareimpactsofmechanicalandmanualbroilercatchingandofcircumstancesatloadingunderfieldconditions |