Cargando…

Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of infections due to the autoimmune disease but also due to the immunosuppressive medication. Although vaccinations are known to be effective in the primary prophylaxis of infections, the vaccination rate in Germany is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiltz, U., Celik, A., Tsiami, S., Baraliakos, X., Andreica, I., Kiefer, D., Bühring, B., Braun, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-020-00874-4
_version_ 1783607015387430912
author Kiltz, U.
Celik, A.
Tsiami, S.
Baraliakos, X.
Andreica, I.
Kiefer, D.
Bühring, B.
Braun, J.
author_facet Kiltz, U.
Celik, A.
Tsiami, S.
Baraliakos, X.
Andreica, I.
Kiefer, D.
Bühring, B.
Braun, J.
author_sort Kiltz, U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of infections due to the autoimmune disease but also due to the immunosuppressive medication. Although vaccinations are known to be effective in the primary prophylaxis of infections, the vaccination rate in Germany is generally too low. Due to the recently increasing, sometimes epidemic-like occurrence of measles, the administration of live vaccine against measles has recently become required by law. OBJECTIVE: How many patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are currently sufficiently protected against measles? METHOD: Between December 2017 and October 2018 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases at the Ruhrgebiet Rheumatism Center were prospectively and consecutively included. Data on the disease and treatment at the level of substance classes, patient history of vaccination and infections were collated. All information on vaccinations were controlled in the vaccination certificate. Antibodies against measles were determined using ELISA. The threshold for sufficient protection against measles was set at 150 mIU/ml. RESULTS: Out of 975 patients 540 (55.4%) could present a vaccination certificate. In 201 patients with a certificate (37.2%) vaccination had been documented since birth. Overall, 45 out of 267 patients born after 1970 (16.9%) had sufficient protection against measles. The patient history of measles in childhood showed no differences between patients with and without protective measles IgG antibodies. Protective measles IgG antibodies were detected in 901 out of 928 patients with measurement of the measles IgG antibody level (97.1%). The different principles of action of the current immunosuppressive treatments had no influence on this. CONCLUSION: These data show that at least 2.9% of the patients did not have sufficient protection against measles. Interestingly, the majority of patients born after 1970 had protective antibodies despite the lack of vaccination against measles. The efforts in primary and also in the specialist medical care should be urgently strengthened in order to be able to guarantee an adequate infection prophylaxis in particularly endangered patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7647965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76479652020-11-10 Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt? Kiltz, U. Celik, A. Tsiami, S. Baraliakos, X. Andreica, I. Kiefer, D. Bühring, B. Braun, J. Z Rheumatol Originalien BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of infections due to the autoimmune disease but also due to the immunosuppressive medication. Although vaccinations are known to be effective in the primary prophylaxis of infections, the vaccination rate in Germany is generally too low. Due to the recently increasing, sometimes epidemic-like occurrence of measles, the administration of live vaccine against measles has recently become required by law. OBJECTIVE: How many patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are currently sufficiently protected against measles? METHOD: Between December 2017 and October 2018 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases at the Ruhrgebiet Rheumatism Center were prospectively and consecutively included. Data on the disease and treatment at the level of substance classes, patient history of vaccination and infections were collated. All information on vaccinations were controlled in the vaccination certificate. Antibodies against measles were determined using ELISA. The threshold for sufficient protection against measles was set at 150 mIU/ml. RESULTS: Out of 975 patients 540 (55.4%) could present a vaccination certificate. In 201 patients with a certificate (37.2%) vaccination had been documented since birth. Overall, 45 out of 267 patients born after 1970 (16.9%) had sufficient protection against measles. The patient history of measles in childhood showed no differences between patients with and without protective measles IgG antibodies. Protective measles IgG antibodies were detected in 901 out of 928 patients with measurement of the measles IgG antibody level (97.1%). The different principles of action of the current immunosuppressive treatments had no influence on this. CONCLUSION: These data show that at least 2.9% of the patients did not have sufficient protection against measles. Interestingly, the majority of patients born after 1970 had protective antibodies despite the lack of vaccination against measles. The efforts in primary and also in the specialist medical care should be urgently strengthened in order to be able to guarantee an adequate infection prophylaxis in particularly endangered patients. Springer Medizin 2020-09-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7647965/ /pubmed/32930874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-020-00874-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de.
spellingShingle Originalien
Kiltz, U.
Celik, A.
Tsiami, S.
Baraliakos, X.
Andreica, I.
Kiefer, D.
Bühring, B.
Braun, J.
Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title_full Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title_fullStr Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title_full_unstemmed Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title_short Wie gut sind Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen gegen Masern geschützt?
title_sort wie gut sind patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen erkrankungen gegen masern geschützt?
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7647965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-020-00874-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kiltzu wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT celika wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT tsiamis wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT baraliakosx wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT andreicai wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT kieferd wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT buhringb wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt
AT braunj wiegutsindpatientenmitentzundlichrheumatischenerkrankungengegenmaserngeschutzt