Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong

INTRODUCTION: Lower-dose ceritinib (450 mg) once-daily with food was approved in 2018 in Hong Kong (HK) for first-line treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK +) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs. crizo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loong, Herbert H., Wong, Carlos K. H., Leung, Linda K. S., Chan, Catherine P. K., Chang, Andrea, Zhou, Zheng-Yi, Xie, Jipan, Gibbs, Meaghan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00244-6
_version_ 1783607080423260160
author Loong, Herbert H.
Wong, Carlos K. H.
Leung, Linda K. S.
Chan, Catherine P. K.
Chang, Andrea
Zhou, Zheng-Yi
Xie, Jipan
Gibbs, Meaghan
author_facet Loong, Herbert H.
Wong, Carlos K. H.
Leung, Linda K. S.
Chan, Catherine P. K.
Chang, Andrea
Zhou, Zheng-Yi
Xie, Jipan
Gibbs, Meaghan
author_sort Loong, Herbert H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lower-dose ceritinib (450 mg) once-daily with food was approved in 2018 in Hong Kong (HK) for first-line treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK +) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ALK + NSCLC from a HK healthcare service provider's or government's perspective. METHODS: Costs and effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs. crizotinib over a 20-year time horizon was evaluated using a partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressed disease, and death). The efficacy data for ceritinib were obtained from a phase 3 trial comparing ceritinib with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4) and extrapolated using parametric survival models. Long-term survival associated with crizotinib were estimated using hazard ratio of crizotinib vs. ceritinib obtained from matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014 trials. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events costs, and medical costs associated with each health state were obtained from public sources and converted to 2018 US Dollars. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained were estimated for ceritinib vs. crizotinib. RESULTS: The base case results showed that ceritinib was associated with 3.22 QALYs, 4.51 LYs, and total costs of $157,581 over 20 years. Patients receiving crizotinib had 2.68 QALYs, 3.85 LYs, and $150,424 total costs over the same time horizon. The incremental cost per QALY gained for ceritinib vs crizotinib was $13,343. Results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses in most scenarios. CONCLUSION: Ceritinib offers a cost-effective option compared to crizotinib for previously untreated ALK + advanced NCSLC in HK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7648263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76482632020-11-09 Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong Loong, Herbert H. Wong, Carlos K. H. Leung, Linda K. S. Chan, Catherine P. K. Chang, Andrea Zhou, Zheng-Yi Xie, Jipan Gibbs, Meaghan Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research INTRODUCTION: Lower-dose ceritinib (450 mg) once-daily with food was approved in 2018 in Hong Kong (HK) for first-line treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK +) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ALK + NSCLC from a HK healthcare service provider's or government's perspective. METHODS: Costs and effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs. crizotinib over a 20-year time horizon was evaluated using a partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressed disease, and death). The efficacy data for ceritinib were obtained from a phase 3 trial comparing ceritinib with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4) and extrapolated using parametric survival models. Long-term survival associated with crizotinib were estimated using hazard ratio of crizotinib vs. ceritinib obtained from matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014 trials. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events costs, and medical costs associated with each health state were obtained from public sources and converted to 2018 US Dollars. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained were estimated for ceritinib vs. crizotinib. RESULTS: The base case results showed that ceritinib was associated with 3.22 QALYs, 4.51 LYs, and total costs of $157,581 over 20 years. Patients receiving crizotinib had 2.68 QALYs, 3.85 LYs, and $150,424 total costs over the same time horizon. The incremental cost per QALY gained for ceritinib vs crizotinib was $13,343. Results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses in most scenarios. CONCLUSION: Ceritinib offers a cost-effective option compared to crizotinib for previously untreated ALK + advanced NCSLC in HK. BioMed Central 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7648263/ /pubmed/33292314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00244-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Loong, Herbert H.
Wong, Carlos K. H.
Leung, Linda K. S.
Chan, Catherine P. K.
Chang, Andrea
Zhou, Zheng-Yi
Xie, Jipan
Gibbs, Meaghan
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (alk)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) in hong kong
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00244-6
work_keys_str_mv AT loongherberth costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT wongcarloskh costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT leunglindaks costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT chancatherinepk costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT changandrea costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT zhouzhengyi costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT xiejipan costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong
AT gibbsmeaghan costeffectivenessanalysisofceritinibvscrizotinibinpreviouslyuntreatedanaplasticlymphomakinasealkpositivenonsmallcelllungcancernsclcinhongkong