Cargando…
Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687 |
_version_ | 1783607163367718912 |
---|---|
author | John, Jaison Al-Douri, Abdul Candelaria, Bretta Gandhi, Saurin Guzik, Paul Herndon, Brent Kim, Christopher Kluz, Nicole Thompson, Jennifer Trevino, Jessica Valencia, Victoria Pignone, Michael |
author_facet | John, Jaison Al-Douri, Abdul Candelaria, Bretta Gandhi, Saurin Guzik, Paul Herndon, Brent Kim, Christopher Kluz, Nicole Thompson, Jennifer Trevino, Jessica Valencia, Victoria Pignone, Michael |
author_sort | John, Jaison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network of safety net practices. METHODS: We identified age-eligible patients ages 50-75 within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinic system with evidence of colonoscopy in preceding 10 years. We performed chart reviews to assess key aspects of colonoscopy quality: bowel preparation quality, evidence of cecal intubation, cecal withdrawal time, and the adenoma detection rate. We then utilized established guidelines to assess and revise surveillance colonoscopy intervals, determine whether appropriate surveillance had taken place, and schedule overdue patients as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 26,394 age-eligible patients, a total of 3,970 patients had evidence of prior colonoscopy and 1,709 charts were selected and reviewed. Mean age was 57, 54% identified as women and 51% identified as Hispanic. Of 1709 colonoscopies reviewed, 77% had data on bowel preparation, and of those, 85% had adequate preparation quality. Cecal intubation was documented in 89% of procedures. Adequate cecal withdrawal time was documented in 59% of those with documented cecal intubation. Overall adenoma detection rate was 42%. Initial surveillance interval was clearly stated in 72% (n = 1238) of procedures. Of these, initial recommended intervals were too short in 24.5% (n = 304) and too long in 3.6% (n = 45). A total of 132 patients (10.7%) were overdue for appropriate surveillance and were referred for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of screening colonoscopy was high, but reporting was incomplete. We found fair adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines, with significant opportunities to extend surveillance intervals and improve adherence to best practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7648690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76486902020-11-10 Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System John, Jaison Al-Douri, Abdul Candelaria, Bretta Gandhi, Saurin Guzik, Paul Herndon, Brent Kim, Christopher Kluz, Nicole Thompson, Jennifer Trevino, Jessica Valencia, Victoria Pignone, Michael Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network of safety net practices. METHODS: We identified age-eligible patients ages 50-75 within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinic system with evidence of colonoscopy in preceding 10 years. We performed chart reviews to assess key aspects of colonoscopy quality: bowel preparation quality, evidence of cecal intubation, cecal withdrawal time, and the adenoma detection rate. We then utilized established guidelines to assess and revise surveillance colonoscopy intervals, determine whether appropriate surveillance had taken place, and schedule overdue patients as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 26,394 age-eligible patients, a total of 3,970 patients had evidence of prior colonoscopy and 1,709 charts were selected and reviewed. Mean age was 57, 54% identified as women and 51% identified as Hispanic. Of 1709 colonoscopies reviewed, 77% had data on bowel preparation, and of those, 85% had adequate preparation quality. Cecal intubation was documented in 89% of procedures. Adequate cecal withdrawal time was documented in 59% of those with documented cecal intubation. Overall adenoma detection rate was 42%. Initial surveillance interval was clearly stated in 72% (n = 1238) of procedures. Of these, initial recommended intervals were too short in 24.5% (n = 304) and too long in 3.6% (n = 45). A total of 132 patients (10.7%) were overdue for appropriate surveillance and were referred for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of screening colonoscopy was high, but reporting was incomplete. We found fair adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines, with significant opportunities to extend surveillance intervals and improve adherence to best practices. Hindawi 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7648690/ /pubmed/33178263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jaison John et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article John, Jaison Al-Douri, Abdul Candelaria, Bretta Gandhi, Saurin Guzik, Paul Herndon, Brent Kim, Christopher Kluz, Nicole Thompson, Jennifer Trevino, Jessica Valencia, Victoria Pignone, Michael Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title | Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title_full | Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title_fullStr | Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title_full_unstemmed | Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title_short | Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System |
title_sort | colonoscopy quality and adherence to postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines in an underinsured clinic system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnjaison colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT aldouriabdul colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT candelariabretta colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT gandhisaurin colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT guzikpaul colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT herndonbrent colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT kimchristopher colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT kluznicole colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT thompsonjennifer colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT trevinojessica colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT valenciavictoria colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem AT pignonemichael colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem |