Cargando…

Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System

BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John, Jaison, Al-Douri, Abdul, Candelaria, Bretta, Gandhi, Saurin, Guzik, Paul, Herndon, Brent, Kim, Christopher, Kluz, Nicole, Thompson, Jennifer, Trevino, Jessica, Valencia, Victoria, Pignone, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687
_version_ 1783607163367718912
author John, Jaison
Al-Douri, Abdul
Candelaria, Bretta
Gandhi, Saurin
Guzik, Paul
Herndon, Brent
Kim, Christopher
Kluz, Nicole
Thompson, Jennifer
Trevino, Jessica
Valencia, Victoria
Pignone, Michael
author_facet John, Jaison
Al-Douri, Abdul
Candelaria, Bretta
Gandhi, Saurin
Guzik, Paul
Herndon, Brent
Kim, Christopher
Kluz, Nicole
Thompson, Jennifer
Trevino, Jessica
Valencia, Victoria
Pignone, Michael
author_sort John, Jaison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network of safety net practices. METHODS: We identified age-eligible patients ages 50-75 within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinic system with evidence of colonoscopy in preceding 10 years. We performed chart reviews to assess key aspects of colonoscopy quality: bowel preparation quality, evidence of cecal intubation, cecal withdrawal time, and the adenoma detection rate. We then utilized established guidelines to assess and revise surveillance colonoscopy intervals, determine whether appropriate surveillance had taken place, and schedule overdue patients as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 26,394 age-eligible patients, a total of 3,970 patients had evidence of prior colonoscopy and 1,709 charts were selected and reviewed. Mean age was 57, 54% identified as women and 51% identified as Hispanic. Of 1709 colonoscopies reviewed, 77% had data on bowel preparation, and of those, 85% had adequate preparation quality. Cecal intubation was documented in 89% of procedures. Adequate cecal withdrawal time was documented in 59% of those with documented cecal intubation. Overall adenoma detection rate was 42%. Initial surveillance interval was clearly stated in 72% (n = 1238) of procedures. Of these, initial recommended intervals were too short in 24.5% (n = 304) and too long in 3.6% (n = 45). A total of 132 patients (10.7%) were overdue for appropriate surveillance and were referred for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of screening colonoscopy was high, but reporting was incomplete. We found fair adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines, with significant opportunities to extend surveillance intervals and improve adherence to best practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7648690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76486902020-11-10 Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System John, Jaison Al-Douri, Abdul Candelaria, Bretta Gandhi, Saurin Guzik, Paul Herndon, Brent Kim, Christopher Kluz, Nicole Thompson, Jennifer Trevino, Jessica Valencia, Victoria Pignone, Michael Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Delivery of high-quality colonoscopy and adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines is essential to a high-quality screening program, especially in safety net systems with limited resources. We sought to assess colonoscopy quality and ensure appropriate surveillance in a network of safety net practices. METHODS: We identified age-eligible patients ages 50-75 within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinic system with evidence of colonoscopy in preceding 10 years. We performed chart reviews to assess key aspects of colonoscopy quality: bowel preparation quality, evidence of cecal intubation, cecal withdrawal time, and the adenoma detection rate. We then utilized established guidelines to assess and revise surveillance colonoscopy intervals, determine whether appropriate surveillance had taken place, and schedule overdue patients as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 26,394 age-eligible patients, a total of 3,970 patients had evidence of prior colonoscopy and 1,709 charts were selected and reviewed. Mean age was 57, 54% identified as women and 51% identified as Hispanic. Of 1709 colonoscopies reviewed, 77% had data on bowel preparation, and of those, 85% had adequate preparation quality. Cecal intubation was documented in 89% of procedures. Adequate cecal withdrawal time was documented in 59% of those with documented cecal intubation. Overall adenoma detection rate was 42%. Initial surveillance interval was clearly stated in 72% (n = 1238) of procedures. Of these, initial recommended intervals were too short in 24.5% (n = 304) and too long in 3.6% (n = 45). A total of 132 patients (10.7%) were overdue for appropriate surveillance and were referred for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of screening colonoscopy was high, but reporting was incomplete. We found fair adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines, with significant opportunities to extend surveillance intervals and improve adherence to best practices. Hindawi 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7648690/ /pubmed/33178263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jaison John et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
John, Jaison
Al-Douri, Abdul
Candelaria, Bretta
Gandhi, Saurin
Guzik, Paul
Herndon, Brent
Kim, Christopher
Kluz, Nicole
Thompson, Jennifer
Trevino, Jessica
Valencia, Victoria
Pignone, Michael
Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title_full Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title_fullStr Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title_full_unstemmed Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title_short Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System
title_sort colonoscopy quality and adherence to postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines in an underinsured clinic system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6240687
work_keys_str_mv AT johnjaison colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT aldouriabdul colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT candelariabretta colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT gandhisaurin colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT guzikpaul colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT herndonbrent colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT kimchristopher colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT kluznicole colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT thompsonjennifer colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT trevinojessica colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT valenciavictoria colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem
AT pignonemichael colonoscopyqualityandadherencetopostpolypectomysurveillanceguidelinesinanunderinsuredclinicsystem