Cargando…

Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem, and facet joint pain is responsible for 15–45% of cases. Treatment is multidisciplinary, and when conservative measures are not sufficient, radiofrequency (RF) is often used. It allows the interruption of nociceptive input, producing a heat lesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sansone, Pasquale, Giaccari, Luca G., Lippiello, Antonietta, Aurilio, Caterina, Paladini, Antonella, Passavanti, Maria Beatrice, Pota, Vincenzo, Pace, Maria Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00187-z
_version_ 1783607184440950784
author Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca G.
Lippiello, Antonietta
Aurilio, Caterina
Paladini, Antonella
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
author_facet Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca G.
Lippiello, Antonietta
Aurilio, Caterina
Paladini, Antonella
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
author_sort Sansone, Pasquale
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem, and facet joint pain is responsible for 15–45% of cases. Treatment is multidisciplinary, and when conservative measures are not sufficient, radiofrequency (RF) is often used. It allows the interruption of nociceptive input, producing a heat lesion in a continuous or pulsed mode. METHODS: Medical records of 60 patients who underwent pulsed RF denervation were examined. The standard procedure provided follow-up of pain intensity. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) were recorded before treatment, and 15 and 40 days, and 6 months after treatment. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Successful treatment was defined as more than a 50% reduction in the NRS scores at 6 months compared with pretreatment scores. RESULTS: Scores on the NRS and DN4 were statistically different over time (p < 0.05). Scores at 6 months were significantly decreased when compared with pretreatment scores (p < 0.05). ODI scores decreased during the follow-up period. No adverse effect was recorded and 57 patients (97%) reported successful pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous RF is the gold standard in the management of lumbar facet joint pain. Pulsed RF is a promising technique: patients with chronic LBP who had not responded to conservative care tended to improve after pulsed RF. The procedure was well tolerated in the absence of contraindications, and reliable if the nerve endings regrew.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7648804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76488042020-11-10 Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca G. Lippiello, Antonietta Aurilio, Caterina Paladini, Antonella Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem, and facet joint pain is responsible for 15–45% of cases. Treatment is multidisciplinary, and when conservative measures are not sufficient, radiofrequency (RF) is often used. It allows the interruption of nociceptive input, producing a heat lesion in a continuous or pulsed mode. METHODS: Medical records of 60 patients who underwent pulsed RF denervation were examined. The standard procedure provided follow-up of pain intensity. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) were recorded before treatment, and 15 and 40 days, and 6 months after treatment. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Successful treatment was defined as more than a 50% reduction in the NRS scores at 6 months compared with pretreatment scores. RESULTS: Scores on the NRS and DN4 were statistically different over time (p < 0.05). Scores at 6 months were significantly decreased when compared with pretreatment scores (p < 0.05). ODI scores decreased during the follow-up period. No adverse effect was recorded and 57 patients (97%) reported successful pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous RF is the gold standard in the management of lumbar facet joint pain. Pulsed RF is a promising technique: patients with chronic LBP who had not responded to conservative care tended to improve after pulsed RF. The procedure was well tolerated in the absence of contraindications, and reliable if the nerve endings regrew. Springer Healthcare 2020-08-08 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7648804/ /pubmed/32770486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00187-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca G.
Lippiello, Antonietta
Aurilio, Caterina
Paladini, Antonella
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title_full Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title_short Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Viable Therapeutic Option? A Retrospective Observational Study
title_sort pulsed radiofrequency for lumbar facet joint pain: a viable therapeutic option? a retrospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-020-00187-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sansonepasquale pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT giaccarilucag pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lippielloantonietta pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT auriliocaterina pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT paladiniantonella pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT passavantimariabeatrice pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT potavincenzo pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pacemariacaterina pulsedradiofrequencyforlumbarfacetjointpainaviabletherapeuticoptionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy