Cargando…

Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis

BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McHugh, Christian T., Garside, John, Barkes, Jared, Frank, Jonathan, Dragicevich, Constance, Yuan, Hong, Branca, Rosa T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x
_version_ 1783607186162712576
author McHugh, Christian T.
Garside, John
Barkes, Jared
Frank, Jonathan
Dragicevich, Constance
Yuan, Hong
Branca, Rosa T.
author_facet McHugh, Christian T.
Garside, John
Barkes, Jared
Frank, Jonathan
Dragicevich, Constance
Yuan, Hong
Branca, Rosa T.
author_sort McHugh, Christian T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, and radiotracer uptake in BAT during adrenergic stimulation is often used as a surrogate measure for identifying thermogenic activity in the tissue. BAT thermogenesis is believed to be contingent upon the expression of the protein UCP1, but conflicting results have been reported in the literature concerning [(18)F]FDG uptake within BAT of mice with and without UCP1. Differences in animal handling techniques such as feeding status, type of anesthetic, type of BAT stimulation, and estrogen levels were identified as possible confounding variables for [(18)F]FDG uptake. In this study, we aimed to assess differences in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake between wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice using a protocol that minimizes possible variations in BAT stimulation caused by different stress responses to mouse handling. RESULTS: [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were run on mice that were anesthetized with pentobarbital after stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis by norepinephrine. While in wild-type mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT increased significantly with norepinephrine stimulation of BAT, there was no consistent change in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of mice lacking UCP1. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FDG uptake within adrenergically stimulated BAT of wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice can significantly vary such that an [(18)F]FDG uptake threshold cannot be used to differentiate wild-type from UCP1-knockout mice. However, while an increase in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake during adrenergic stimulation is consistently observed in wild-type mice, in UCP1-knockout mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT seems to be independent of β(3)-adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7648812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76488122020-11-09 Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis McHugh, Christian T. Garside, John Barkes, Jared Frank, Jonathan Dragicevich, Constance Yuan, Hong Branca, Rosa T. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, and radiotracer uptake in BAT during adrenergic stimulation is often used as a surrogate measure for identifying thermogenic activity in the tissue. BAT thermogenesis is believed to be contingent upon the expression of the protein UCP1, but conflicting results have been reported in the literature concerning [(18)F]FDG uptake within BAT of mice with and without UCP1. Differences in animal handling techniques such as feeding status, type of anesthetic, type of BAT stimulation, and estrogen levels were identified as possible confounding variables for [(18)F]FDG uptake. In this study, we aimed to assess differences in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake between wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice using a protocol that minimizes possible variations in BAT stimulation caused by different stress responses to mouse handling. RESULTS: [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were run on mice that were anesthetized with pentobarbital after stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis by norepinephrine. While in wild-type mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT increased significantly with norepinephrine stimulation of BAT, there was no consistent change in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of mice lacking UCP1. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FDG uptake within adrenergically stimulated BAT of wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice can significantly vary such that an [(18)F]FDG uptake threshold cannot be used to differentiate wild-type from UCP1-knockout mice. However, while an increase in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake during adrenergic stimulation is consistently observed in wild-type mice, in UCP1-knockout mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT seems to be independent of β(3)-adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7648812/ /pubmed/33159596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
McHugh, Christian T.
Garside, John
Barkes, Jared
Frank, Jonathan
Dragicevich, Constance
Yuan, Hong
Branca, Rosa T.
Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title_full Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title_fullStr Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title_short Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
title_sort differences in [(18)f]fdg uptake in bat of ucp1 −/− and ucp1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mchughchristiant differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT garsidejohn differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT barkesjared differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT frankjonathan differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT dragicevichconstance differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT yuanhong differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis
AT brancarosat differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis