Cargando…
Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis
BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x |
_version_ | 1783607186162712576 |
---|---|
author | McHugh, Christian T. Garside, John Barkes, Jared Frank, Jonathan Dragicevich, Constance Yuan, Hong Branca, Rosa T. |
author_facet | McHugh, Christian T. Garside, John Barkes, Jared Frank, Jonathan Dragicevich, Constance Yuan, Hong Branca, Rosa T. |
author_sort | McHugh, Christian T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, and radiotracer uptake in BAT during adrenergic stimulation is often used as a surrogate measure for identifying thermogenic activity in the tissue. BAT thermogenesis is believed to be contingent upon the expression of the protein UCP1, but conflicting results have been reported in the literature concerning [(18)F]FDG uptake within BAT of mice with and without UCP1. Differences in animal handling techniques such as feeding status, type of anesthetic, type of BAT stimulation, and estrogen levels were identified as possible confounding variables for [(18)F]FDG uptake. In this study, we aimed to assess differences in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake between wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice using a protocol that minimizes possible variations in BAT stimulation caused by different stress responses to mouse handling. RESULTS: [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were run on mice that were anesthetized with pentobarbital after stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis by norepinephrine. While in wild-type mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT increased significantly with norepinephrine stimulation of BAT, there was no consistent change in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of mice lacking UCP1. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FDG uptake within adrenergically stimulated BAT of wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice can significantly vary such that an [(18)F]FDG uptake threshold cannot be used to differentiate wild-type from UCP1-knockout mice. However, while an increase in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake during adrenergic stimulation is consistently observed in wild-type mice, in UCP1-knockout mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT seems to be independent of β(3)-adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7648812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76488122020-11-09 Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis McHugh, Christian T. Garside, John Barkes, Jared Frank, Jonathan Dragicevich, Constance Yuan, Hong Branca, Rosa T. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a fat tissue found in most mammals that helps regulate energy balance and core body temperature through a sympathetic process known as non-shivering thermogenesis. BAT activity is commonly detected and quantified in [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, and radiotracer uptake in BAT during adrenergic stimulation is often used as a surrogate measure for identifying thermogenic activity in the tissue. BAT thermogenesis is believed to be contingent upon the expression of the protein UCP1, but conflicting results have been reported in the literature concerning [(18)F]FDG uptake within BAT of mice with and without UCP1. Differences in animal handling techniques such as feeding status, type of anesthetic, type of BAT stimulation, and estrogen levels were identified as possible confounding variables for [(18)F]FDG uptake. In this study, we aimed to assess differences in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake between wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice using a protocol that minimizes possible variations in BAT stimulation caused by different stress responses to mouse handling. RESULTS: [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were run on mice that were anesthetized with pentobarbital after stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis by norepinephrine. While in wild-type mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT increased significantly with norepinephrine stimulation of BAT, there was no consistent change in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of mice lacking UCP1. CONCLUSIONS: [(18)F]FDG uptake within adrenergically stimulated BAT of wild-type and UCP1-knockout mice can significantly vary such that an [(18)F]FDG uptake threshold cannot be used to differentiate wild-type from UCP1-knockout mice. However, while an increase in BAT [(18)F]FDG uptake during adrenergic stimulation is consistently observed in wild-type mice, in UCP1-knockout mice [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT seems to be independent of β(3)-adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7648812/ /pubmed/33159596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research McHugh, Christian T. Garside, John Barkes, Jared Frank, Jonathan Dragicevich, Constance Yuan, Hong Branca, Rosa T. Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title | Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title_full | Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title_fullStr | Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title_short | Differences in [(18)F]FDG uptake in BAT of UCP1 −/− and UCP1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
title_sort | differences in [(18)f]fdg uptake in bat of ucp1 −/− and ucp1 +/+ during adrenergic stimulation of non-shivering thermogenesis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00726-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mchughchristiant differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT garsidejohn differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT barkesjared differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT frankjonathan differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT dragicevichconstance differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT yuanhong differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis AT brancarosat differencesin18ffdguptakeinbatofucp1anducp1duringadrenergicstimulationofnonshiveringthermogenesis |