Cargando…

Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French soci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bregman, Bruno, Teitsson, Siguroli, Orsini, Isabella, Cotté, François-Emery, Amadi, Adenike, Moshyk, Andriy, Roze, Stéphane, Gaudin, Anne-Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z
_version_ 1783607270051938304
author Bregman, Bruno
Teitsson, Siguroli
Orsini, Isabella
Cotté, François-Emery
Amadi, Adenike
Moshyk, Andriy
Roze, Stéphane
Gaudin, Anne-Françoise
author_facet Bregman, Bruno
Teitsson, Siguroli
Orsini, Isabella
Cotté, François-Emery
Amadi, Adenike
Moshyk, Andriy
Roze, Stéphane
Gaudin, Anne-Françoise
author_sort Bregman, Bruno
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French societal perspective. METHODS: The comparators were observation, low-dose interferon and pembrolizumab. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with BRAF mutation, adding dabrafenib plus trametinib. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to project costs and health benefits over a 20-year time horizon. Extrapolation for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was carried out using spline-based models. Because of the immaturity of OS data in pivotal trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a predictive model of OS treatment effect based on RFS effect was developed using a correlation equation. Health state utilities and adverse events disutilities were derived from the CheckMate 238 trial and literature. Costs were estimated in 2019 euros. The model’s primary outcome was efficiency frontier. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Observation, low-dose interferon and nivolumab were on the efficiency frontier. The incremental cost–utility ratio of nivolumab versus low-dose interferon (closest therapy on the efficiency frontier) was €37,886/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reported an 80% probability of nivolumab being a cost-effective strategy for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €52,000/QALY. In the subgroup with BRAF mutation, the efficiency frontier was not changed by the addition of dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a cost-effective strategy as adjuvant treatment in adult patients with surgically resected melanoma in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7649185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76491852020-11-10 Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France Bregman, Bruno Teitsson, Siguroli Orsini, Isabella Cotté, François-Emery Amadi, Adenike Moshyk, Andriy Roze, Stéphane Gaudin, Anne-Françoise Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French societal perspective. METHODS: The comparators were observation, low-dose interferon and pembrolizumab. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with BRAF mutation, adding dabrafenib plus trametinib. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to project costs and health benefits over a 20-year time horizon. Extrapolation for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was carried out using spline-based models. Because of the immaturity of OS data in pivotal trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a predictive model of OS treatment effect based on RFS effect was developed using a correlation equation. Health state utilities and adverse events disutilities were derived from the CheckMate 238 trial and literature. Costs were estimated in 2019 euros. The model’s primary outcome was efficiency frontier. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Observation, low-dose interferon and nivolumab were on the efficiency frontier. The incremental cost–utility ratio of nivolumab versus low-dose interferon (closest therapy on the efficiency frontier) was €37,886/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reported an 80% probability of nivolumab being a cost-effective strategy for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €52,000/QALY. In the subgroup with BRAF mutation, the efficiency frontier was not changed by the addition of dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a cost-effective strategy as adjuvant treatment in adult patients with surgically resected melanoma in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7649185/ /pubmed/32920709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bregman, Bruno
Teitsson, Siguroli
Orsini, Isabella
Cotté, François-Emery
Amadi, Adenike
Moshyk, Andriy
Roze, Stéphane
Gaudin, Anne-Françoise
Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title_full Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title_fullStr Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title_full_unstemmed Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title_short Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
title_sort cost–utility analysis of nivolumab in adjuvant treatment of melanoma in france
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bregmanbruno costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT teitssonsiguroli costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT orsiniisabella costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT cottefrancoisemery costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT amadiadenike costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT moshykandriy costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT rozestephane costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance
AT gaudinannefrancoise costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance