Cargando…
Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French soci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z |
_version_ | 1783607270051938304 |
---|---|
author | Bregman, Bruno Teitsson, Siguroli Orsini, Isabella Cotté, François-Emery Amadi, Adenike Moshyk, Andriy Roze, Stéphane Gaudin, Anne-Françoise |
author_facet | Bregman, Bruno Teitsson, Siguroli Orsini, Isabella Cotté, François-Emery Amadi, Adenike Moshyk, Andriy Roze, Stéphane Gaudin, Anne-Françoise |
author_sort | Bregman, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French societal perspective. METHODS: The comparators were observation, low-dose interferon and pembrolizumab. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with BRAF mutation, adding dabrafenib plus trametinib. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to project costs and health benefits over a 20-year time horizon. Extrapolation for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was carried out using spline-based models. Because of the immaturity of OS data in pivotal trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a predictive model of OS treatment effect based on RFS effect was developed using a correlation equation. Health state utilities and adverse events disutilities were derived from the CheckMate 238 trial and literature. Costs were estimated in 2019 euros. The model’s primary outcome was efficiency frontier. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Observation, low-dose interferon and nivolumab were on the efficiency frontier. The incremental cost–utility ratio of nivolumab versus low-dose interferon (closest therapy on the efficiency frontier) was €37,886/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reported an 80% probability of nivolumab being a cost-effective strategy for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €52,000/QALY. In the subgroup with BRAF mutation, the efficiency frontier was not changed by the addition of dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a cost-effective strategy as adjuvant treatment in adult patients with surgically resected melanoma in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7649185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76491852020-11-10 Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France Bregman, Bruno Teitsson, Siguroli Orsini, Isabella Cotté, François-Emery Amadi, Adenike Moshyk, Andriy Roze, Stéphane Gaudin, Anne-Françoise Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French societal perspective. METHODS: The comparators were observation, low-dose interferon and pembrolizumab. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with BRAF mutation, adding dabrafenib plus trametinib. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to project costs and health benefits over a 20-year time horizon. Extrapolation for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was carried out using spline-based models. Because of the immaturity of OS data in pivotal trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a predictive model of OS treatment effect based on RFS effect was developed using a correlation equation. Health state utilities and adverse events disutilities were derived from the CheckMate 238 trial and literature. Costs were estimated in 2019 euros. The model’s primary outcome was efficiency frontier. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Observation, low-dose interferon and nivolumab were on the efficiency frontier. The incremental cost–utility ratio of nivolumab versus low-dose interferon (closest therapy on the efficiency frontier) was €37,886/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reported an 80% probability of nivolumab being a cost-effective strategy for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €52,000/QALY. In the subgroup with BRAF mutation, the efficiency frontier was not changed by the addition of dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a cost-effective strategy as adjuvant treatment in adult patients with surgically resected melanoma in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7649185/ /pubmed/32920709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bregman, Bruno Teitsson, Siguroli Orsini, Isabella Cotté, François-Emery Amadi, Adenike Moshyk, Andriy Roze, Stéphane Gaudin, Anne-Françoise Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title | Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title_full | Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title_fullStr | Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title_short | Cost–Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France |
title_sort | cost–utility analysis of nivolumab in adjuvant treatment of melanoma in france |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bregmanbruno costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT teitssonsiguroli costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT orsiniisabella costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT cottefrancoisemery costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT amadiadenike costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT moshykandriy costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT rozestephane costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance AT gaudinannefrancoise costutilityanalysisofnivolumabinadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomainfrance |