Cargando…

Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry

INTRODUCTION: To date, no studies examining the effect of treatment interruptions (TI) with proton beam therapy (PBT) have been published. The goal of our study was to determine the predictors of TI amongst patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with PBT and to determine whether TI are associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, James E., Chang, John, Rosen, Lane, Hartsell, William, Tsai, Henry, Chen, Jonathan, Mishra, Mark V., Krauss, Daniel, Isabelle Choi, J., Simone, Charles B., Hasan, Shaakir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.003
_version_ 1783607317634220032
author Han, James E.
Chang, John
Rosen, Lane
Hartsell, William
Tsai, Henry
Chen, Jonathan
Mishra, Mark V.
Krauss, Daniel
Isabelle Choi, J.
Simone, Charles B.
Hasan, Shaakir
author_facet Han, James E.
Chang, John
Rosen, Lane
Hartsell, William
Tsai, Henry
Chen, Jonathan
Mishra, Mark V.
Krauss, Daniel
Isabelle Choi, J.
Simone, Charles B.
Hasan, Shaakir
author_sort Han, James E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To date, no studies examining the effect of treatment interruptions (TI) with proton beam therapy (PBT) have been published. The goal of our study was to determine the predictors of TI amongst patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with PBT and to determine whether TI are associated with biochemical failure (BF). We hypothesized that any correlation between TI and biochemical control would be more pronounced in high risk groups. METHODS: Data for 4278 patients with PCa was obtained from the prospectively collected Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) data registry. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to model possible predictors of BF. A subset analysis was performed for high risk patients treated with ADT and PBT. Finally, propensity score (PS) analysis was performed to account for any indication bias caused by lack of randomization. RESULTS: Total treatment duration (OR, 1.05 [1.04–1.06]; p < 0.001) increased the likelihood of TI on MVA. TI did not have a statistically significant correlation with BF (OR, 1.44 [0.86–2.39]; p = 0.162) amongst PS matched patients. However, on subset analyses of high risk group patients with PS matching, there was a trend towards worse BF in patients with TI (OR 3.85; 95%CI (0.96–15.44); p = 0.057). CONCLUSION: In the first analysis of its kind, the results suggest that TI in high risk PCa patients treated with PBT and ADT have worse BF rates. Interventions such as increased patient education, proper maintenance of proton facilities, and decreasing total treatment duration with alternative fractionation schedules may help avoid the unintended negative effects on tumor control due to TI. However, future analyses on a larger patient population is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7649394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76493942020-11-16 Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry Han, James E. Chang, John Rosen, Lane Hartsell, William Tsai, Henry Chen, Jonathan Mishra, Mark V. Krauss, Daniel Isabelle Choi, J. Simone, Charles B. Hasan, Shaakir Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: To date, no studies examining the effect of treatment interruptions (TI) with proton beam therapy (PBT) have been published. The goal of our study was to determine the predictors of TI amongst patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with PBT and to determine whether TI are associated with biochemical failure (BF). We hypothesized that any correlation between TI and biochemical control would be more pronounced in high risk groups. METHODS: Data for 4278 patients with PCa was obtained from the prospectively collected Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) data registry. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to model possible predictors of BF. A subset analysis was performed for high risk patients treated with ADT and PBT. Finally, propensity score (PS) analysis was performed to account for any indication bias caused by lack of randomization. RESULTS: Total treatment duration (OR, 1.05 [1.04–1.06]; p < 0.001) increased the likelihood of TI on MVA. TI did not have a statistically significant correlation with BF (OR, 1.44 [0.86–2.39]; p = 0.162) amongst PS matched patients. However, on subset analyses of high risk group patients with PS matching, there was a trend towards worse BF in patients with TI (OR 3.85; 95%CI (0.96–15.44); p = 0.057). CONCLUSION: In the first analysis of its kind, the results suggest that TI in high risk PCa patients treated with PBT and ADT have worse BF rates. Interventions such as increased patient education, proper maintenance of proton facilities, and decreasing total treatment duration with alternative fractionation schedules may help avoid the unintended negative effects on tumor control due to TI. However, future analyses on a larger patient population is needed. Elsevier 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7649394/ /pubmed/33204857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Han, James E.
Chang, John
Rosen, Lane
Hartsell, William
Tsai, Henry
Chen, Jonathan
Mishra, Mark V.
Krauss, Daniel
Isabelle Choi, J.
Simone, Charles B.
Hasan, Shaakir
Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title_full Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title_fullStr Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title_full_unstemmed Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title_short Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
title_sort treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjamese treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT changjohn treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT rosenlane treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT hartsellwilliam treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT tsaihenry treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT chenjonathan treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT mishramarkv treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT kraussdaniel treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT isabellechoij treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT simonecharlesb treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry
AT hasanshaakir treatmentinterruptionsaffectbiochemicalfailureratesinprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotonbeamtherapyreportfromthemultiinstitutionalprotoncollaborativegroupregistry