Cargando…

A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers

A complete blood count is a highly automated laboratory test. The use of highly advanced measurement methods increases the accuracy and sensitivity of the determination of individual hematological parameters, especially in the case of white blood cells differentiation. Therefore, it is necessary to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Małecka, Milena, Ciepiela, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00186
_version_ 1783607346565480448
author Małecka, Milena
Ciepiela, Olga
author_facet Małecka, Milena
Ciepiela, Olga
author_sort Małecka, Milena
collection PubMed
description A complete blood count is a highly automated laboratory test. The use of highly advanced measurement methods increases the accuracy and sensitivity of the determination of individual hematological parameters, especially in the case of white blood cells differentiation. Therefore, it is necessary to make comparative analyses, which involve performance of the analyzers used in daily work. The aim of the study was to indicate whether the results obtained using two compared analyzers show significant differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study a comparative analysis of 241 peripheral blood samples from adult patients was performed. The complete blood count results were obtained using two automated hematology analyzers: Sysmex XN-2000 and Horiba Yumizen H2500. The Passing-Bablok regression method and Bland- Altman analysis were also used to evaluate the results received for both analyzers. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found for four hematological parameters: eosinophil count, immature granulocytes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and platelet distribution width (PDW). The P value for MCHC was 0.01. Sysmex XN-2000 and Horiba Yumizen H2500 also showed disagreement in plate platelet distribution width (PDW) (P ​= ​0.04). For other parameters both analyzers showed good agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the study, it was shown that there are significant differences in the measurements of hematological parameters between compared analyzers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7649520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76495202020-11-16 A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers Małecka, Milena Ciepiela, Olga Pract Lab Med Article A complete blood count is a highly automated laboratory test. The use of highly advanced measurement methods increases the accuracy and sensitivity of the determination of individual hematological parameters, especially in the case of white blood cells differentiation. Therefore, it is necessary to make comparative analyses, which involve performance of the analyzers used in daily work. The aim of the study was to indicate whether the results obtained using two compared analyzers show significant differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study a comparative analysis of 241 peripheral blood samples from adult patients was performed. The complete blood count results were obtained using two automated hematology analyzers: Sysmex XN-2000 and Horiba Yumizen H2500. The Passing-Bablok regression method and Bland- Altman analysis were also used to evaluate the results received for both analyzers. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found for four hematological parameters: eosinophil count, immature granulocytes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and platelet distribution width (PDW). The P value for MCHC was 0.01. Sysmex XN-2000 and Horiba Yumizen H2500 also showed disagreement in plate platelet distribution width (PDW) (P ​= ​0.04). For other parameters both analyzers showed good agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the study, it was shown that there are significant differences in the measurements of hematological parameters between compared analyzers. Elsevier 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7649520/ /pubmed/33204791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00186 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Małecka, Milena
Ciepiela, Olga
A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title_full A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title_fullStr A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title_short A comparison of Sysmex-XN 2000 and Yumizen H2500 automated hematology analyzers
title_sort comparison of sysmex-xn 2000 and yumizen h2500 automated hematology analyzers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00186
work_keys_str_mv AT małeckamilena acomparisonofsysmexxn2000andyumizenh2500automatedhematologyanalyzers
AT ciepielaolga acomparisonofsysmexxn2000andyumizenh2500automatedhematologyanalyzers
AT małeckamilena comparisonofsysmexxn2000andyumizenh2500automatedhematologyanalyzers
AT ciepielaolga comparisonofsysmexxn2000andyumizenh2500automatedhematologyanalyzers