Cargando…
Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100 |
_version_ | 1783607371813093376 |
---|---|
author | Nanyonga, Rose Clarke Bosire, Edna N Heller, David J Bradley, Elizabeth Reynolds, Nancy R |
author_facet | Nanyonga, Rose Clarke Bosire, Edna N Heller, David J Bradley, Elizabeth Reynolds, Nancy R |
author_sort | Nanyonga, Rose Clarke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-report, peers, co-workers, other); and (2) to determine factors (positively) associated with leadership practices. We surveyed 480 nurses, 120 in leadership roles (Response Rate 57%) and 360 ‘followers’ (Response Rate 60%), who were recruited from five hospitals in Kampala, Uganda. We used the Leadership Practice Inventory (Self and Observer), a project-specific demographic questionnaire and Denison’s Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS). Sixty-three per cent of the respondents held a registered nursing certificate; 79% had received formal leadership training; 47% were based in private for-profit (PFP) hospitals, 28% in private not-for-profit (PNFP) and 25% in public hospitals. Among the five leadership practices, nurses-in-leadership used the practice of Model the Way (M = 8.27, SD = 1.30), Challenge the Process (M = 8.12, SD = 1.30) and Encourage the Heart (M = 8.04, SD = 1.51) more frequently (on a 10-point Likert Scale). Inspire a Shared Vision (M = 7.82, SD = 1.57) and Enable Others to Act (M = 7.62, SD = 1.66) practices were used less frequently. The same rank order was true for leadership scores from the perception of followers. However, leadership scores by followers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the nurse leader self-reported scores across all sub-scales. Leadership practice scores were higher in public than private hospitals (P < 0.0001). Organizational culture (OC) was associated (P < 0.001) with leadership practices. Although overall leadership practice scores were generally high, the less frequent use of Inspire and Enable practices suggests opportunities for targeted improvement. Moreover, differences between self-reported and leadership scores by followers suggest perception gaps between leaders and their followers. The positive relationship between public hospital settings and self-reported leadership practices among nurses-in-leadership suggests that important nursing leadership practices are possible even in a low-resource clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7649667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76496672020-11-16 Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study Nanyonga, Rose Clarke Bosire, Edna N Heller, David J Bradley, Elizabeth Reynolds, Nancy R Health Policy Plan Supplement Articles Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-report, peers, co-workers, other); and (2) to determine factors (positively) associated with leadership practices. We surveyed 480 nurses, 120 in leadership roles (Response Rate 57%) and 360 ‘followers’ (Response Rate 60%), who were recruited from five hospitals in Kampala, Uganda. We used the Leadership Practice Inventory (Self and Observer), a project-specific demographic questionnaire and Denison’s Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS). Sixty-three per cent of the respondents held a registered nursing certificate; 79% had received formal leadership training; 47% were based in private for-profit (PFP) hospitals, 28% in private not-for-profit (PNFP) and 25% in public hospitals. Among the five leadership practices, nurses-in-leadership used the practice of Model the Way (M = 8.27, SD = 1.30), Challenge the Process (M = 8.12, SD = 1.30) and Encourage the Heart (M = 8.04, SD = 1.51) more frequently (on a 10-point Likert Scale). Inspire a Shared Vision (M = 7.82, SD = 1.57) and Enable Others to Act (M = 7.62, SD = 1.66) practices were used less frequently. The same rank order was true for leadership scores from the perception of followers. However, leadership scores by followers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the nurse leader self-reported scores across all sub-scales. Leadership practice scores were higher in public than private hospitals (P < 0.0001). Organizational culture (OC) was associated (P < 0.001) with leadership practices. Although overall leadership practice scores were generally high, the less frequent use of Inspire and Enable practices suggests opportunities for targeted improvement. Moreover, differences between self-reported and leadership scores by followers suggest perception gaps between leaders and their followers. The positive relationship between public hospital settings and self-reported leadership practices among nurses-in-leadership suggests that important nursing leadership practices are possible even in a low-resource clinical setting. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7649667/ /pubmed/33165580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Articles Nanyonga, Rose Clarke Bosire, Edna N Heller, David J Bradley, Elizabeth Reynolds, Nancy R Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title | Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | predictors of nursing leadership in uganda: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Supplement Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nanyongaroseclarke predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy AT bosireednan predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy AT hellerdavidj predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy AT bradleyelizabeth predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy AT reynoldsnancyr predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy |