Cargando…

Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nanyonga, Rose Clarke, Bosire, Edna N, Heller, David J, Bradley, Elizabeth, Reynolds, Nancy R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100
_version_ 1783607371813093376
author Nanyonga, Rose Clarke
Bosire, Edna N
Heller, David J
Bradley, Elizabeth
Reynolds, Nancy R
author_facet Nanyonga, Rose Clarke
Bosire, Edna N
Heller, David J
Bradley, Elizabeth
Reynolds, Nancy R
author_sort Nanyonga, Rose Clarke
collection PubMed
description Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-report, peers, co-workers, other); and (2) to determine factors (positively) associated with leadership practices. We surveyed 480 nurses, 120 in leadership roles (Response Rate 57%) and 360 ‘followers’ (Response Rate 60%), who were recruited from five hospitals in Kampala, Uganda. We used the Leadership Practice Inventory (Self and Observer), a project-specific demographic questionnaire and Denison’s Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS). Sixty-three per cent of the respondents held a registered nursing certificate; 79% had received formal leadership training; 47% were based in private for-profit (PFP) hospitals, 28% in private not-for-profit (PNFP) and 25% in public hospitals. Among the five leadership practices, nurses-in-leadership used the practice of Model the Way (M = 8.27, SD = 1.30), Challenge the Process (M = 8.12, SD = 1.30) and Encourage the Heart (M = 8.04, SD = 1.51) more frequently (on a 10-point Likert Scale). Inspire a Shared Vision (M = 7.82, SD = 1.57) and Enable Others to Act (M = 7.62, SD = 1.66) practices were used less frequently. The same rank order was true for leadership scores from the perception of followers. However, leadership scores by followers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the nurse leader self-reported scores across all sub-scales. Leadership practice scores were higher in public than private hospitals (P < 0.0001). Organizational culture (OC) was associated (P < 0.001) with leadership practices. Although overall leadership practice scores were generally high, the less frequent use of Inspire and Enable practices suggests opportunities for targeted improvement. Moreover, differences between self-reported and leadership scores by followers suggest perception gaps between leaders and their followers. The positive relationship between public hospital settings and self-reported leadership practices among nurses-in-leadership suggests that important nursing leadership practices are possible even in a low-resource clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7649667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76496672020-11-16 Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study Nanyonga, Rose Clarke Bosire, Edna N Heller, David J Bradley, Elizabeth Reynolds, Nancy R Health Policy Plan Supplement Articles Evidence regarding the role of nurses-in-leadership and how to engage nurses in policy decisions is minimal in sub-Saharan Africa. The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the leadership practices of nurses-in-leadership in Uganda (by self-report) and from the perspective of ‘followers’ (direct-report, peers, co-workers, other); and (2) to determine factors (positively) associated with leadership practices. We surveyed 480 nurses, 120 in leadership roles (Response Rate 57%) and 360 ‘followers’ (Response Rate 60%), who were recruited from five hospitals in Kampala, Uganda. We used the Leadership Practice Inventory (Self and Observer), a project-specific demographic questionnaire and Denison’s Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS). Sixty-three per cent of the respondents held a registered nursing certificate; 79% had received formal leadership training; 47% were based in private for-profit (PFP) hospitals, 28% in private not-for-profit (PNFP) and 25% in public hospitals. Among the five leadership practices, nurses-in-leadership used the practice of Model the Way (M = 8.27, SD = 1.30), Challenge the Process (M = 8.12, SD = 1.30) and Encourage the Heart (M = 8.04, SD = 1.51) more frequently (on a 10-point Likert Scale). Inspire a Shared Vision (M = 7.82, SD = 1.57) and Enable Others to Act (M = 7.62, SD = 1.66) practices were used less frequently. The same rank order was true for leadership scores from the perception of followers. However, leadership scores by followers were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the nurse leader self-reported scores across all sub-scales. Leadership practice scores were higher in public than private hospitals (P < 0.0001). Organizational culture (OC) was associated (P < 0.001) with leadership practices. Although overall leadership practice scores were generally high, the less frequent use of Inspire and Enable practices suggests opportunities for targeted improvement. Moreover, differences between self-reported and leadership scores by followers suggest perception gaps between leaders and their followers. The positive relationship between public hospital settings and self-reported leadership practices among nurses-in-leadership suggests that important nursing leadership practices are possible even in a low-resource clinical setting. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7649667/ /pubmed/33165580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Nanyonga, Rose Clarke
Bosire, Edna N
Heller, David J
Bradley, Elizabeth
Reynolds, Nancy R
Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_full Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_short Predictors of nursing leadership in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_sort predictors of nursing leadership in uganda: a cross-sectional study
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa100
work_keys_str_mv AT nanyongaroseclarke predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bosireednan predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT hellerdavidj predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bradleyelizabeth predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT reynoldsnancyr predictorsofnursingleadershipinugandaacrosssectionalstudy