Cargando…

Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region

Governance failures undermine efforts to achieve universal health coverage and improve health in low- and middle-income countries by decreasing efficiency and equity. Punitive measures to improve governance are largely ineffective. Social accountability strategies are perceived to enhance transparen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naher, Nahitun, Balabanova, Dina, Hutchinson, Eleanor, Marten, Robert, Hoque, Roksana, Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal, Islam, Bushra Zarin, Ahmed, Syed Masud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa107
_version_ 1783607372524027904
author Naher, Nahitun
Balabanova, Dina
Hutchinson, Eleanor
Marten, Robert
Hoque, Roksana
Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal
Islam, Bushra Zarin
Ahmed, Syed Masud
author_facet Naher, Nahitun
Balabanova, Dina
Hutchinson, Eleanor
Marten, Robert
Hoque, Roksana
Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal
Islam, Bushra Zarin
Ahmed, Syed Masud
author_sort Naher, Nahitun
collection PubMed
description Governance failures undermine efforts to achieve universal health coverage and improve health in low- and middle-income countries by decreasing efficiency and equity. Punitive measures to improve governance are largely ineffective. Social accountability strategies are perceived to enhance transparency and accountability through bottom-up approaches, but their effectiveness has not been explored comprehensively in the health systems of low- and middle-income countries in south and Southeast Asia where these strategies have been promoted. We conducted a narrative literature review to explore innovative social accountability approaches in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Indonesia, the Maldives, Myanmar and Nepal spanning the period 2007–August 2017, searching PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. To augment this, we also performed additional PubMed and Google Scholar searches (September 2017–December 2019) to identify recent papers, resulting in 38 documents (24 peer-reviewed articles and 14 grey sources), which we reviewed. Findings were analysed using framework analysis and categorized into three major themes: transparency/governance (eight), accountability (11) and community participation (five) papers. The majority of the reviewed approaches were implemented in Bangladesh, India and Nepal. The interventions differed on context (geographical to social), range (boarder reform to specific approaches), actors (public to private) and levels (community-specific to system level). The initiatives were associated with a variety of positive outcomes (e.g. improved monitoring, resource mobilization, service provision plus as a bridge between the engaged community and the health system), yet the evidence is inconclusive as to the extent that these influence health outcomes and access to health care. The review shows that there is no common blueprint which makes accountability mechanisms viable and effective; the effectiveness of these initiatives depended largely on context, capacity, information, spectrum of actor involvement, independence from power agendas and leadership. Major challenges that undermined effective implementation include lack of capacity, poor commitment and design and insufficient community participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7649670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76496702020-11-16 Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region Naher, Nahitun Balabanova, Dina Hutchinson, Eleanor Marten, Robert Hoque, Roksana Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal Islam, Bushra Zarin Ahmed, Syed Masud Health Policy Plan Supplement Articles Governance failures undermine efforts to achieve universal health coverage and improve health in low- and middle-income countries by decreasing efficiency and equity. Punitive measures to improve governance are largely ineffective. Social accountability strategies are perceived to enhance transparency and accountability through bottom-up approaches, but their effectiveness has not been explored comprehensively in the health systems of low- and middle-income countries in south and Southeast Asia where these strategies have been promoted. We conducted a narrative literature review to explore innovative social accountability approaches in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Indonesia, the Maldives, Myanmar and Nepal spanning the period 2007–August 2017, searching PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. To augment this, we also performed additional PubMed and Google Scholar searches (September 2017–December 2019) to identify recent papers, resulting in 38 documents (24 peer-reviewed articles and 14 grey sources), which we reviewed. Findings were analysed using framework analysis and categorized into three major themes: transparency/governance (eight), accountability (11) and community participation (five) papers. The majority of the reviewed approaches were implemented in Bangladesh, India and Nepal. The interventions differed on context (geographical to social), range (boarder reform to specific approaches), actors (public to private) and levels (community-specific to system level). The initiatives were associated with a variety of positive outcomes (e.g. improved monitoring, resource mobilization, service provision plus as a bridge between the engaged community and the health system), yet the evidence is inconclusive as to the extent that these influence health outcomes and access to health care. The review shows that there is no common blueprint which makes accountability mechanisms viable and effective; the effectiveness of these initiatives depended largely on context, capacity, information, spectrum of actor involvement, independence from power agendas and leadership. Major challenges that undermined effective implementation include lack of capacity, poor commitment and design and insufficient community participation. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7649670/ /pubmed/33165587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa107 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Naher, Nahitun
Balabanova, Dina
Hutchinson, Eleanor
Marten, Robert
Hoque, Roksana
Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal
Islam, Bushra Zarin
Ahmed, Syed Masud
Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title_full Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title_fullStr Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title_full_unstemmed Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title_short Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region
title_sort do social accountability approaches work? a review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the who south-east asia region
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa107
work_keys_str_mv AT nahernahitun dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT balabanovadina dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT hutchinsoneleanor dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT martenrobert dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT hoqueroksana dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT tunesamiunnazrinbentekamal dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT islambushrazarin dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion
AT ahmedsyedmasud dosocialaccountabilityapproachesworkareviewoftheliteraturefromselectedlowandmiddleincomecountriesinthewhosoutheastasiaregion