Cargando…
Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the causative agent of pneumonia cases in China. This virus is spread by coughing or sneezing and can infect other persons by on contacting mucous membranes. SARS-Cov-2 most frequent serious manifestation is pneumonia. Chest comput...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649892/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-020-00039-9 |
_version_ | 1783607414702997504 |
---|---|
author | Mahmoud, Heba Taha, Mohamed Shehata Askoura, Anas Aleem, Mohammed Omran, Azza Aboelela, Soha |
author_facet | Mahmoud, Heba Taha, Mohamed Shehata Askoura, Anas Aleem, Mohammed Omran, Azza Aboelela, Soha |
author_sort | Mahmoud, Heba |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the causative agent of pneumonia cases in China. This virus is spread by coughing or sneezing and can infect other persons by on contacting mucous membranes. SARS-Cov-2 most frequent serious manifestation is pneumonia. Chest computed tomography in COVID-19 patients usually shows ground-glass opacities that may be accompanied by consolidation lesions. Early diagnosis of the disease and rapid isolation of the patient is of great importance. So far, confirmation of COVID-19 infection is made by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal or respiratory specimens. Recent research reported that the sensitivity of computed tomography in diagnosing COVID-19 is 98% while RT-PCR sensitivity is 71%. Herein, we compare the sensitivity of both chest CT and RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 at initial patient presentation through a meta-analysis study. MAIN BODY: Using MEDLINE database a systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant published studies within from November 2019 to April 2020. Only articles with full text were examined to determine eligibility and extract data by two reviewers. It was decided to include studies mentioning sensitivity of chest CT scan and sensitivity of RT-PCR and both done at the same time. RESULTS: Potentially relevant 15,300 studies were identified in our search in MEDLINE whose titles were quickly reviewed. Potentially eligible studies missing any of the forementioned inclusion criteria were excluded. This process left 7 eligible articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were thus included in the meta-analysis and used for further analyses. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis study showed that chest CT may be beneficial in early detection of cases of COVID-19. Imaging, in adjunct to clinical and laboratory findings, should be used for monitoring of disease course, until further evidence is available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7649892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76498922020-11-09 Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study Mahmoud, Heba Taha, Mohamed Shehata Askoura, Anas Aleem, Mohammed Omran, Azza Aboelela, Soha Egypt J Otolaryngol Review Article ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the causative agent of pneumonia cases in China. This virus is spread by coughing or sneezing and can infect other persons by on contacting mucous membranes. SARS-Cov-2 most frequent serious manifestation is pneumonia. Chest computed tomography in COVID-19 patients usually shows ground-glass opacities that may be accompanied by consolidation lesions. Early diagnosis of the disease and rapid isolation of the patient is of great importance. So far, confirmation of COVID-19 infection is made by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal or respiratory specimens. Recent research reported that the sensitivity of computed tomography in diagnosing COVID-19 is 98% while RT-PCR sensitivity is 71%. Herein, we compare the sensitivity of both chest CT and RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 at initial patient presentation through a meta-analysis study. MAIN BODY: Using MEDLINE database a systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant published studies within from November 2019 to April 2020. Only articles with full text were examined to determine eligibility and extract data by two reviewers. It was decided to include studies mentioning sensitivity of chest CT scan and sensitivity of RT-PCR and both done at the same time. RESULTS: Potentially relevant 15,300 studies were identified in our search in MEDLINE whose titles were quickly reviewed. Potentially eligible studies missing any of the forementioned inclusion criteria were excluded. This process left 7 eligible articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were thus included in the meta-analysis and used for further analyses. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis study showed that chest CT may be beneficial in early detection of cases of COVID-19. Imaging, in adjunct to clinical and laboratory findings, should be used for monitoring of disease course, until further evidence is available. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7649892/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-020-00039-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mahmoud, Heba Taha, Mohamed Shehata Askoura, Anas Aleem, Mohammed Omran, Azza Aboelela, Soha Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title | Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title_full | Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title_fullStr | Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title_short | Can chest CT improve sensitivity of COVID-19 diagnosis in comparison to PCR? A meta-analysis study |
title_sort | can chest ct improve sensitivity of covid-19 diagnosis in comparison to pcr? a meta-analysis study |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649892/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43163-020-00039-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudheba canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy AT tahamohamedshehata canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy AT askouraanas canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy AT aleemmohammed canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy AT omranazza canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy AT aboelelasoha canchestctimprovesensitivityofcovid19diagnosisincomparisontopcrametaanalysisstudy |