Cargando…

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to estimate a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient Physical and Rehabilitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Katajapuu, Niina, Heinonen, Ari, Saltychev, Mikhail
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:	Data Collection tools
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520942573

Ejemplares similares

Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: the WHODAS 2.0
por: Young, Carolyn A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
por: Wong, Jessica J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients
por: Higgins, Alisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
por: Wawrzyniak, Kelly M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

WHODAS 2.0-BO: normative data for the assessment of disability in older adults
por: Ferrer, Michele Lacerda Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan
por: Chao, Pin-Zhir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is WHODAS 2.0 Useful for Colorectal Cancer Survivors?
por: Lee, Hyun Haeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
por: Norén, Paulina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease
por: Kim, Ji-In, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measurement of patient reported disability using WHODAS 2.0 before and after surgical intervention in Madagascar
por: White, Michelle C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a Population-Based Sample of Youth
por: Kimber, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease: measures of functioning in neuropsychiatric disease
por: Downing, Nancy R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain
por: Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso Nwamaka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mapping the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) onto SF-6D Using Swedish General Population Data
por: Philipson, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

ETCM v2.0: An update with comprehensive resource and rich annotations for traditional Chinese medicine
por: Zhang, Yanqiong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

WHODAS 2.0 as a Measure of Severity of Illness: Results of a FLDA Analysis
por: Sedano-Capdevila, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item Arabic World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a screening tool for Syrian refugees
por: Akhtar, Aemal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Three Quality of Life Instruments in Lymphatic Filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ
por: Thomas, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
por: Yang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
por: Svanborg, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12‐item tool against the 36‐item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12‐item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women
por: Mayrink, Jussara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Analysis and visualization of Arabidopsis thaliana GWAS using web 2.0 technologies
por: Huang, Yu S., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

CCBuilder 2.0: Powerful and accessible coiled‐coil modeling
por: Wood, Christopher W., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
por: Holmberg, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis
por: Bejer, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
por: Andrews, Gavin, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal
por: Risal, Ajay, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

DOMMINO 2.0: integrating structurally resolved protein-, RNA-, and DNA-mediated macromolecular interactions
por: Kuang, Xingyan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Guidelines for Biosafety in Teaching Laboratories Version 2.0: A Revised and Updated Manual for 2019
por: Byrd, Jeffrey J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Using WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functional Impairment in People with Depression: Should Employment Receive More Attention?
por: Chiang, Yu-Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

NutriChem 2.0: exploring the effect of plant-based foods on human health and drug efficacy
por: Ni, Yueqiong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?
por: Galli, Tiziana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0
por: Yoon, Seo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_p019aqvc6klnp3438p5e5vcrpi