Cargando…

Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)

BACKGROUND: Selective peripheral denervation via botulinum neurotoxin injections into dystonic muscles is the first-line treatment for cervical dystonia. Pallidal neurostimulation is a potent alternative, but currently restricted to patients failing on neurotoxin therapy. As botulinum neurotoxin is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odorfer, Thorsten M., Malzahn, Uwe, Matthies, Cordula, Heuschmann, Peter U., Volkmann, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-019-0007-3
_version_ 1783607444786642944
author Odorfer, Thorsten M.
Malzahn, Uwe
Matthies, Cordula
Heuschmann, Peter U.
Volkmann, Jens
author_facet Odorfer, Thorsten M.
Malzahn, Uwe
Matthies, Cordula
Heuschmann, Peter U.
Volkmann, Jens
author_sort Odorfer, Thorsten M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selective peripheral denervation via botulinum neurotoxin injections into dystonic muscles is the first-line treatment for cervical dystonia. Pallidal neurostimulation is a potent alternative, but currently restricted to patients failing on neurotoxin therapy. As botulinum neurotoxin is partially effective but often unsatisfactory in a relevant proportion of patients, earlier neurostimulation might be advantageous in providing stable symptom control and preventing disability. This trial intends to demonstrate, that pallidal neurostimulation is superior to neurotoxin injections in best clinical practice for controlling the symptoms of cervical dystonia and that it is safe in patients with a partial therapy response to peripheral denervation. We hypothesize a better outcome in everyday functioning and health-related quality of life of neurostimulated patients. METHODS: We aim to recruit 66 cervical dystonia patients into a double-blind comparison of pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum neurotoxin type A. Eligible patients need ≥25% motor symptom reduction 4 weeks after a neurotoxin test injection, but are willing to undergo DBS surgery due to unsatisfactory symptom control. All participants will be implanted with a DBS system, and randomized into 2 groups: First group will receive effective neurostimulation and saline injections into dystonic muscles. Second group is treated with regular neurotoxin injections and undergoes a sham-stimulation. Primary outcome is the change in TWSTRS total score between baseline and 6 months of therapy. Secondary outcome parameters are corresponding changes in TWSTRS motor score, Tsui score, CDQ-24 and SF-36. Safety will be assessed by frequency and severity of reported adverse events. Statistical analysis includes intention-to-treat and per protocol populations, analysis based on imputation of missing values and analysis adjusting for differences in baseline TWSTRS. After 6 months of blinded treatment all patients will receive open-label neurostimulation and neurotoxin treatment as needed, and are followed up 48 weeks after randomization. PERSPECTIVE: We will assess if pallidal neurostimulation is a safe and effective alternative to selective peripheral denervation by botulinum toxin injections in cervical dystonia, which may be offered earlier in the course of disease based on patient preference. A positive study outcome would influence future treatment guidelines of cervical dystonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT registration number: 2016–001378-13
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7650073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76500732020-12-14 Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD) Odorfer, Thorsten M. Malzahn, Uwe Matthies, Cordula Heuschmann, Peter U. Volkmann, Jens Neurol Res Pract Clinical Trial Protocol BACKGROUND: Selective peripheral denervation via botulinum neurotoxin injections into dystonic muscles is the first-line treatment for cervical dystonia. Pallidal neurostimulation is a potent alternative, but currently restricted to patients failing on neurotoxin therapy. As botulinum neurotoxin is partially effective but often unsatisfactory in a relevant proportion of patients, earlier neurostimulation might be advantageous in providing stable symptom control and preventing disability. This trial intends to demonstrate, that pallidal neurostimulation is superior to neurotoxin injections in best clinical practice for controlling the symptoms of cervical dystonia and that it is safe in patients with a partial therapy response to peripheral denervation. We hypothesize a better outcome in everyday functioning and health-related quality of life of neurostimulated patients. METHODS: We aim to recruit 66 cervical dystonia patients into a double-blind comparison of pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum neurotoxin type A. Eligible patients need ≥25% motor symptom reduction 4 weeks after a neurotoxin test injection, but are willing to undergo DBS surgery due to unsatisfactory symptom control. All participants will be implanted with a DBS system, and randomized into 2 groups: First group will receive effective neurostimulation and saline injections into dystonic muscles. Second group is treated with regular neurotoxin injections and undergoes a sham-stimulation. Primary outcome is the change in TWSTRS total score between baseline and 6 months of therapy. Secondary outcome parameters are corresponding changes in TWSTRS motor score, Tsui score, CDQ-24 and SF-36. Safety will be assessed by frequency and severity of reported adverse events. Statistical analysis includes intention-to-treat and per protocol populations, analysis based on imputation of missing values and analysis adjusting for differences in baseline TWSTRS. After 6 months of blinded treatment all patients will receive open-label neurostimulation and neurotoxin treatment as needed, and are followed up 48 weeks after randomization. PERSPECTIVE: We will assess if pallidal neurostimulation is a safe and effective alternative to selective peripheral denervation by botulinum toxin injections in cervical dystonia, which may be offered earlier in the course of disease based on patient preference. A positive study outcome would influence future treatment guidelines of cervical dystonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT registration number: 2016–001378-13 BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7650073/ /pubmed/33324868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-019-0007-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Protocol
Odorfer, Thorsten M.
Malzahn, Uwe
Matthies, Cordula
Heuschmann, Peter U.
Volkmann, Jens
Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title_full Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title_fullStr Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title_full_unstemmed Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title_short Pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (StimTox-CD)
title_sort pallidal neurostimulation versus botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of cervical dystonia: protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial (stimtox-cd)
topic Clinical Trial Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-019-0007-3
work_keys_str_mv AT odorferthorstenm pallidalneurostimulationversusbotulinumtoxininjectionsinthetreatmentofcervicaldystoniaprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrialstimtoxcd
AT malzahnuwe pallidalneurostimulationversusbotulinumtoxininjectionsinthetreatmentofcervicaldystoniaprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrialstimtoxcd
AT matthiescordula pallidalneurostimulationversusbotulinumtoxininjectionsinthetreatmentofcervicaldystoniaprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrialstimtoxcd
AT heuschmannpeteru pallidalneurostimulationversusbotulinumtoxininjectionsinthetreatmentofcervicaldystoniaprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrialstimtoxcd
AT volkmannjens pallidalneurostimulationversusbotulinumtoxininjectionsinthetreatmentofcervicaldystoniaprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrialstimtoxcd