Cargando…

Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability in western societies. (Motor) cognitive deficits like apraxia significantly contribute to disability after stroke, harming activities of daily living and rehabilitation outcome. To date, efficient therapeutic options for apraxia remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleineberg, Nina N., Richter, Monika K., Becker, Ingrid, Weiss, Peter H., Fink, Gereon R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-0052-y
_version_ 1783607447928176640
author Kleineberg, Nina N.
Richter, Monika K.
Becker, Ingrid
Weiss, Peter H.
Fink, Gereon R.
author_facet Kleineberg, Nina N.
Richter, Monika K.
Becker, Ingrid
Weiss, Peter H.
Fink, Gereon R.
author_sort Kleineberg, Nina N.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability in western societies. (Motor) cognitive deficits like apraxia significantly contribute to disability after stroke, harming activities of daily living and rehabilitation outcome. To date, efficient therapeutic options for apraxia remain sparse. Thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted. METHODS: Based on promising results of a pilot study, the on-going RAdiCS (Rehabilitating stroke-induced Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation) study is a randomized controlled trial, which follows a double-blinded (investigator and patient), two-arm parallel interventional model. It is designed to include 110 apraxic patients (as diagnosed by the Cologne Apraxia Screening, KAS) in the subacute phase after a left hemisphere (LH) stroke. The University of Cologne initiated the trial, which is conducted in two German Neurorehabilitation Centers. The study aims to evaluate the effect of anodal (versus sham) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 min on five consecutive days on apraxic deficits. In addition to anodal or sham tDCS, all LH stroke patients undergo a motor (cognitive) training that is performed before and after the stimulation (off-line stimulation). The primary outcome measure is the (differential) change in the overall KAS score after five daily sessions of anodal versus sham tDCS when compared to the baseline assessment before tDCS. Secondary study outcomes include further apraxia scores, aphasia severity, and measures of motor performance and disability after stroke. All outcome measures are obtained in the post-stimulation assessment as well as during follow-up (3–4 months after tDCS). PERSPECTIVE: The RCT RAdiCS shall evaluate in a large number of LH stroke patients whether anodal tDCS (compared to sham tDCS) expedites the rehabilitation of apraxia – over and above additional motor (cognitive) training and standard care. A positive study outcome would provide a new strategy for the treatment of apraxia, which hopefully ameliorates the negative impact of apraxia on daily living and long-term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Gov: NCT03185234, registered 14 June 2017 ; Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien: DRKS00012292, registered 01 June 2017. TRIAL STATUS: Participant enrollment began on 22 June 2017. The trial is expected to be completed on 30 June 2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7650086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76500862020-12-14 Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation” Kleineberg, Nina N. Richter, Monika K. Becker, Ingrid Weiss, Peter H. Fink, Gereon R. Neurol Res Pract Clinical Trial Protocol INTRODUCTION: Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability in western societies. (Motor) cognitive deficits like apraxia significantly contribute to disability after stroke, harming activities of daily living and rehabilitation outcome. To date, efficient therapeutic options for apraxia remain sparse. Thus, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted. METHODS: Based on promising results of a pilot study, the on-going RAdiCS (Rehabilitating stroke-induced Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation) study is a randomized controlled trial, which follows a double-blinded (investigator and patient), two-arm parallel interventional model. It is designed to include 110 apraxic patients (as diagnosed by the Cologne Apraxia Screening, KAS) in the subacute phase after a left hemisphere (LH) stroke. The University of Cologne initiated the trial, which is conducted in two German Neurorehabilitation Centers. The study aims to evaluate the effect of anodal (versus sham) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 min on five consecutive days on apraxic deficits. In addition to anodal or sham tDCS, all LH stroke patients undergo a motor (cognitive) training that is performed before and after the stimulation (off-line stimulation). The primary outcome measure is the (differential) change in the overall KAS score after five daily sessions of anodal versus sham tDCS when compared to the baseline assessment before tDCS. Secondary study outcomes include further apraxia scores, aphasia severity, and measures of motor performance and disability after stroke. All outcome measures are obtained in the post-stimulation assessment as well as during follow-up (3–4 months after tDCS). PERSPECTIVE: The RCT RAdiCS shall evaluate in a large number of LH stroke patients whether anodal tDCS (compared to sham tDCS) expedites the rehabilitation of apraxia – over and above additional motor (cognitive) training and standard care. A positive study outcome would provide a new strategy for the treatment of apraxia, which hopefully ameliorates the negative impact of apraxia on daily living and long-term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Gov: NCT03185234, registered 14 June 2017 ; Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien: DRKS00012292, registered 01 June 2017. TRIAL STATUS: Participant enrollment began on 22 June 2017. The trial is expected to be completed on 30 June 2022. BioMed Central 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7650086/ /pubmed/33324913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-0052-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Protocol
Kleineberg, Nina N.
Richter, Monika K.
Becker, Ingrid
Weiss, Peter H.
Fink, Gereon R.
Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title_full Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title_fullStr Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title_full_unstemmed Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title_short Verum versus sham tDCS in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial RAdiCS -“Rehabilitating (stroke-induced) Apraxia with direct Current Stimulation”
title_sort verum versus sham tdcs in the treatment of stroke-induced apraxia: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial radics -“rehabilitating (stroke-induced) apraxia with direct current stimulation”
topic Clinical Trial Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-0052-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinebergninan verumversusshamtdcsinthetreatmentofstrokeinducedapraxiastudyprotocoloftherandomizedcontrolledtrialradicsrehabilitatingstrokeinducedapraxiawithdirectcurrentstimulation
AT richtermonikak verumversusshamtdcsinthetreatmentofstrokeinducedapraxiastudyprotocoloftherandomizedcontrolledtrialradicsrehabilitatingstrokeinducedapraxiawithdirectcurrentstimulation
AT beckeringrid verumversusshamtdcsinthetreatmentofstrokeinducedapraxiastudyprotocoloftherandomizedcontrolledtrialradicsrehabilitatingstrokeinducedapraxiawithdirectcurrentstimulation
AT weisspeterh verumversusshamtdcsinthetreatmentofstrokeinducedapraxiastudyprotocoloftherandomizedcontrolledtrialradicsrehabilitatingstrokeinducedapraxiawithdirectcurrentstimulation
AT finkgereonr verumversusshamtdcsinthetreatmentofstrokeinducedapraxiastudyprotocoloftherandomizedcontrolledtrialradicsrehabilitatingstrokeinducedapraxiawithdirectcurrentstimulation