Cargando…
Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia
BACKGROUND: Clinical analytics is a rapidly developing area of informatics and knowledge mobilisation which has huge potential to improve healthcare in the future. It is widely acknowledged to be a powerful mediator of clinical decision making, patient-centred care and organisational learning. As a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7 |
_version_ | 1783607473423253504 |
---|---|
author | Sutherland, Kim Yeung, Wilson Mak, Yoke Levesque, Jean-Frederic |
author_facet | Sutherland, Kim Yeung, Wilson Mak, Yoke Levesque, Jean-Frederic |
author_sort | Sutherland, Kim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical analytics is a rapidly developing area of informatics and knowledge mobilisation which has huge potential to improve healthcare in the future. It is widely acknowledged to be a powerful mediator of clinical decision making, patient-centred care and organisational learning. As a result, healthcare systems require a strategic foundation for clinical analytics that is sufficiently directional to support meaningful change while flexible enough to allow for iteration and responsiveness to context as change occurs. METHODS: In New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, the Clinical Analytics Working Group was charged with developing a five-year vision for the public health system. A modified Delphi process was undertaken to elicit expert views and to reach a consensus. The process included a combination of face-to-face workshops, traditional Delphi voting via email, and innovative, real-time iteration between text re-formulation and voting until consensus was reached. The six stage process engaged 35 experts — practising clinicians, patients and consumers, managers, policymakers, data scientists and academics. RESULTS: The process resulted in the production of 135 ideas that were subsequently synthesised into 23 agreed statements and encapsulated in a single page (456 word) narrative. CONCLUSION: The visioning process highlighted three key perspectives (clinicians, patients and managers) and the need for synchronous (during the clinical encounter) and asynchronous (outside the clinical encounter) clinical decision support and reflective practice tools; the use of new and multiple data sources and communication formats; and the role of research and education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7650225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76502252020-11-09 Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia Sutherland, Kim Yeung, Wilson Mak, Yoke Levesque, Jean-Frederic BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical analytics is a rapidly developing area of informatics and knowledge mobilisation which has huge potential to improve healthcare in the future. It is widely acknowledged to be a powerful mediator of clinical decision making, patient-centred care and organisational learning. As a result, healthcare systems require a strategic foundation for clinical analytics that is sufficiently directional to support meaningful change while flexible enough to allow for iteration and responsiveness to context as change occurs. METHODS: In New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, the Clinical Analytics Working Group was charged with developing a five-year vision for the public health system. A modified Delphi process was undertaken to elicit expert views and to reach a consensus. The process included a combination of face-to-face workshops, traditional Delphi voting via email, and innovative, real-time iteration between text re-formulation and voting until consensus was reached. The six stage process engaged 35 experts — practising clinicians, patients and consumers, managers, policymakers, data scientists and academics. RESULTS: The process resulted in the production of 135 ideas that were subsequently synthesised into 23 agreed statements and encapsulated in a single page (456 word) narrative. CONCLUSION: The visioning process highlighted three key perspectives (clinicians, patients and managers) and the need for synchronous (during the clinical encounter) and asynchronous (outside the clinical encounter) clinical decision support and reflective practice tools; the use of new and multiple data sources and communication formats; and the role of research and education. BioMed Central 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7650225/ /pubmed/32887609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sutherland, Kim Yeung, Wilson Mak, Yoke Levesque, Jean-Frederic Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title | Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full | Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title_fullStr | Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title_short | Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia |
title_sort | envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified delphi process in new south wales, australia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutherlandkim envisioningthefutureofclinicalanalyticsamodifieddelphiprocessinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT yeungwilson envisioningthefutureofclinicalanalyticsamodifieddelphiprocessinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT makyoke envisioningthefutureofclinicalanalyticsamodifieddelphiprocessinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT levesquejeanfrederic envisioningthefutureofclinicalanalyticsamodifieddelphiprocessinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT envisioningthefutureofclinicalanalyticsamodifieddelphiprocessinnewsouthwalesaustralia |