Cargando…

Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Understanding how species interact with agricultural landscapes is essential for future conservation efforts. Using a large-scale citizen science project, we examined the influence linear features have on bat activity compared to the centre of agricultural fields and detailed the eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finch, Domhnall, Schofield, Henry, Mathews, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
_version_ 1783607549182869504
author Finch, Domhnall
Schofield, Henry
Mathews, Fiona
author_facet Finch, Domhnall
Schofield, Henry
Mathews, Fiona
author_sort Finch, Domhnall
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Understanding how species interact with agricultural landscapes is essential for future conservation efforts. Using a large-scale citizen science project, we examined the influence linear features have on bat activity compared to the centre of agricultural fields and detailed the effect of different types of linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). Our results showed that all 10 bat species groups identified during surveys occurred both in the centre of fields as well as along linear features. Out of the five species groups analysed further, only Nyctalus noctula had no preference for linear features, compared to the centre of agricultural fields; however, 29% of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum calls were recorded in the centre of fields. More species were active near treelines compared to other linear feature types. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments ABSTRACT: 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula. However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7650766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76507662020-11-10 Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats Finch, Domhnall Schofield, Henry Mathews, Fiona Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Understanding how species interact with agricultural landscapes is essential for future conservation efforts. Using a large-scale citizen science project, we examined the influence linear features have on bat activity compared to the centre of agricultural fields and detailed the effect of different types of linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). Our results showed that all 10 bat species groups identified during surveys occurred both in the centre of fields as well as along linear features. Out of the five species groups analysed further, only Nyctalus noctula had no preference for linear features, compared to the centre of agricultural fields; however, 29% of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum calls were recorded in the centre of fields. More species were active near treelines compared to other linear feature types. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments ABSTRACT: 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula. However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments. MDPI 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7650766/ /pubmed/33053844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Finch, Domhnall
Schofield, Henry
Mathews, Fiona
Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_fullStr Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full_unstemmed Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_short Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_sort habitat associations of bats in an agricultural landscape: linear features versus open habitats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33053844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
work_keys_str_mv AT finchdomhnall habitatassociationsofbatsinanagriculturallandscapelinearfeaturesversusopenhabitats
AT schofieldhenry habitatassociationsofbatsinanagriculturallandscapelinearfeaturesversusopenhabitats
AT mathewsfiona habitatassociationsofbatsinanagriculturallandscapelinearfeaturesversusopenhabitats