Cargando…

Recommendations from Thai stakeholders about protecting HIV remission (‘cure’) trial participants: report from a participatory workshop

BACKGROUND: The social/behavioral HIV Decision-Making Study (DMS) assesses informed consent and trial experiences of individuals in HIV remission trials in Thailand. We convened a 1-d multi-stakeholder participatory workshop in Bangkok. We provide a meeting summary and reactions from DMS investigato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peay, Holly L, Ormsby, Nuchanart Q, Henderson, Gail E, Jupimai, Thidarat, Rennie, Stuart, Siripassorn, Krittaecho, Kanchawee, Kunakorn, Isaacson, Sinéad, Cadigan, R Jean, Kuczynski, Kriste, Likhitwonnawut, Udom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7650909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa067
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The social/behavioral HIV Decision-Making Study (DMS) assesses informed consent and trial experiences of individuals in HIV remission trials in Thailand. We convened a 1-d multi-stakeholder participatory workshop in Bangkok. We provide a meeting summary and reactions from DMS investigators. METHODS: Workshop members viewed de-identified interview excerpts from DMS participants. They deliberated on the findings and made recommendations regarding informed choice for remission trials. Notes and recordings were used to create a summary report, which was reviewed by members and refined. RESULTS: Workshop members’ recommendations included HIV education and psychosocial support to establish the basis for informed choice, key trial information to be provided in everyday language, supportive decision-making processes and psychosocial care during and after the trial. Concerns included participant willingness to restart antiretrovirals after trial-mandated treatment interruption, unintended influence of the research team on decision-making and seemingly altruistic motivations for trial participation that may signal attempts to atone for stigmatized behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop highlighted community perspectives and resulted in recommendations for supporting informed choice and psychosocial and physical health. These are the first such recommendations arising from a deliberative process. Although some elements are rooted in the Thai context, most are applicable across remission trials.