Cargando…

INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?

The incidence of glioblastoma (GBM) peaks in the 7(th) and 8(th) decades of life. Multiple treatment options exist for older patients with GBM however, the assessment of older patients prior to treatment decisions is poorly researched and lacks standardization. In order to address this issue we perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorimer, Cressida, Chalmers, Anthony, Johnson, Margaret, Brock, Juliet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651013/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.494
_version_ 1783607573002321920
author Lorimer, Cressida
Chalmers, Anthony
Johnson, Margaret
Brock, Juliet
author_facet Lorimer, Cressida
Chalmers, Anthony
Johnson, Margaret
Brock, Juliet
author_sort Lorimer, Cressida
collection PubMed
description The incidence of glioblastoma (GBM) peaks in the 7(th) and 8(th) decades of life. Multiple treatment options exist for older patients with GBM however, the assessment of older patients prior to treatment decisions is poorly researched and lacks standardization. In order to address this issue we performed a cross-sectional electronic survey distributed to all full members of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. There were 116 respondents from a total of 1515 recipients (8% response rate). The survey was distributed during the peak of COVID-19 which undoubtedly affected response rates. 97% of respondents were clinicians with 86% academic. 72% had been in practice > 10 years and the majority saw 5–10 new GBM cases per month. 95% of respondents were from the USA, with involvement from Japan, Australia, Canada and Italy. 37% of respondents routinely perform a cognitive or frailty screening test. Of these, MMSE and MoCA were the most commonly used. Of those who performed a screening test, the majority reported that the results changed their treatment decision in approximately 50% of cases. 50% of respondents have access to a multidisciplinary team during their clinic, with physical therapy being the most available. When making treatment decisions, participants ranked performance status as the most important clinical factor. Considering the heterogeneity of this patient population, we argue that performance status is a crude measure of vulnerability within this cohort. In the first survey of this kind, we have shown a disparity in assessment techniques across the international neuro-oncology field and the impact performing a cognitive screen has on decision making. Older patients with GBM represent a unique clinical scenario because of the complexity of distinguishing neuro- oncology related symptoms from general frailty. There is a need for specific geriatric assessment models tailored to the older neuro-oncology population in order to facilitate treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7651013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76510132020-12-09 INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT? Lorimer, Cressida Chalmers, Anthony Johnson, Margaret Brock, Juliet Neuro Oncol Innovations in Patient Care The incidence of glioblastoma (GBM) peaks in the 7(th) and 8(th) decades of life. Multiple treatment options exist for older patients with GBM however, the assessment of older patients prior to treatment decisions is poorly researched and lacks standardization. In order to address this issue we performed a cross-sectional electronic survey distributed to all full members of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. There were 116 respondents from a total of 1515 recipients (8% response rate). The survey was distributed during the peak of COVID-19 which undoubtedly affected response rates. 97% of respondents were clinicians with 86% academic. 72% had been in practice > 10 years and the majority saw 5–10 new GBM cases per month. 95% of respondents were from the USA, with involvement from Japan, Australia, Canada and Italy. 37% of respondents routinely perform a cognitive or frailty screening test. Of these, MMSE and MoCA were the most commonly used. Of those who performed a screening test, the majority reported that the results changed their treatment decision in approximately 50% of cases. 50% of respondents have access to a multidisciplinary team during their clinic, with physical therapy being the most available. When making treatment decisions, participants ranked performance status as the most important clinical factor. Considering the heterogeneity of this patient population, we argue that performance status is a crude measure of vulnerability within this cohort. In the first survey of this kind, we have shown a disparity in assessment techniques across the international neuro-oncology field and the impact performing a cognitive screen has on decision making. Older patients with GBM represent a unique clinical scenario because of the complexity of distinguishing neuro- oncology related symptoms from general frailty. There is a need for specific geriatric assessment models tailored to the older neuro-oncology population in order to facilitate treatment decisions. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7651013/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.494 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
spellingShingle Innovations in Patient Care
Lorimer, Cressida
Chalmers, Anthony
Johnson, Margaret
Brock, Juliet
INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title_full INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title_fullStr INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title_full_unstemmed INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title_short INNV-11. GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE OLDER PERSON – HOW DO WE DECIDE ON TREATMENT?
title_sort innv-11. glioblastoma in the older person – how do we decide on treatment?
topic Innovations in Patient Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651013/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.494
work_keys_str_mv AT lorimercressida innv11glioblastomaintheolderpersonhowdowedecideontreatment
AT chalmersanthony innv11glioblastomaintheolderpersonhowdowedecideontreatment
AT johnsonmargaret innv11glioblastomaintheolderpersonhowdowedecideontreatment
AT brockjuliet innv11glioblastomaintheolderpersonhowdowedecideontreatment