Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study

BACKGROUND: We investigated how relevant and responsive scientists and research ethics committee (REC) members considered the research protocol review processes for health research practice in Uganda. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with five scientists and five REC members. Data were analysed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ssali, Agnes, Poland, Fiona, Seeley, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Short Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa047
_version_ 1783607578884833280
author Ssali, Agnes
Poland, Fiona
Seeley, Janet
author_facet Ssali, Agnes
Poland, Fiona
Seeley, Janet
author_sort Ssali, Agnes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated how relevant and responsive scientists and research ethics committee (REC) members considered the research protocol review processes for health research practice in Uganda. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with five scientists and five REC members. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: How much to compensate for time, the amount of study information shared with volunteers and sample storage for future unknown research were areas of concern for REC members. Delays in getting feedback concerned scientists. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers and REC members need to hold regular discussions to ensure the review process is relevant and responsive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7651429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76514292020-11-16 Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study Ssali, Agnes Poland, Fiona Seeley, Janet Int Health Short Communication BACKGROUND: We investigated how relevant and responsive scientists and research ethics committee (REC) members considered the research protocol review processes for health research practice in Uganda. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with five scientists and five REC members. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: How much to compensate for time, the amount of study information shared with volunteers and sample storage for future unknown research were areas of concern for REC members. Delays in getting feedback concerned scientists. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers and REC members need to hold regular discussions to ensure the review process is relevant and responsive. Oxford University Press 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7651429/ /pubmed/33165548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa047 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Ssali, Agnes
Poland, Fiona
Seeley, Janet
Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title_full Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title_fullStr Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title_short Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study
title_sort experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in uganda: a case study
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33165548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa047
work_keys_str_mv AT ssaliagnes experiencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersandscientistsoftheresearchprotocolreviewprocessinugandaacasestudy
AT polandfiona experiencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersandscientistsoftheresearchprotocolreviewprocessinugandaacasestudy
AT seeleyjanet experiencesofresearchethicscommitteemembersandscientistsoftheresearchprotocolreviewprocessinugandaacasestudy

Ejemplares similares