Cargando…
An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection
BACKGROUND: Lower Clostridium difficile spore counts in feces from C difficile infection (CDI) patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin have been observed. We aimed to determine whether environmental contamination is lower in patients treated with fidaxomicin compared with those treated w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa362 |
_version_ | 1783607581018685440 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Kerrie Mawer, Damian Walker, A Sarah Berry, Claire Planche, Timothy Stanley, Phil Goldenberg, Simon Sandoe, Jonathan Wilcox, Mark H |
author_facet | Davies, Kerrie Mawer, Damian Walker, A Sarah Berry, Claire Planche, Timothy Stanley, Phil Goldenberg, Simon Sandoe, Jonathan Wilcox, Mark H |
author_sort | Davies, Kerrie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lower Clostridium difficile spore counts in feces from C difficile infection (CDI) patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin have been observed. We aimed to determine whether environmental contamination is lower in patients treated with fidaxomicin compared with those treated with vancomycin/metronidazole. METHODS: The CDI cases were recruited at 4 UK hospitals (Leeds, Bradford, and London [2 centers]). Environmental samples (5 room sites) were taken pretreatment and at 2–3, 4–5, 6–8, and 9–12 days of treatment, end of treatment (EOT), and post-EOT. Fecal samples were collected at diagnosis and as often as produced thereafter. Swabs/feces were cultured for C difficile; percentage of C difficile-positive samples and C difficile bioburden were compared between different treatment arms at each time point. RESULTS: Pre-EOT (n = 244), there was a significant reduction in environmental contamination (≥1 site positive) around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients at days 4–5 (30% vs 50% recipients, P = .04) and at days 9–12 (22% vs 49%, P = .005). This trend was consistently seen at all other timepoints, but it was not statistically significant. No differences were seen between treatment groups post-EOT (n = 76). Fidaxomicin-associated fecal positivity rates and colony counts were consistently lower than those for vancomycin/metronidazole from days 4 to 5 of treatment (including post-EOT); however, the only significant difference was in positivity rate at days 9–12 (15% vs 55%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant reductions in C difficile recovery from both feces and the environment around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients. Therefore, fidaxomicin treatment may lower the C difficile transmission risk by reducing excretion and environmental contamination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7651500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76515002020-11-16 An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection Davies, Kerrie Mawer, Damian Walker, A Sarah Berry, Claire Planche, Timothy Stanley, Phil Goldenberg, Simon Sandoe, Jonathan Wilcox, Mark H Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Lower Clostridium difficile spore counts in feces from C difficile infection (CDI) patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin have been observed. We aimed to determine whether environmental contamination is lower in patients treated with fidaxomicin compared with those treated with vancomycin/metronidazole. METHODS: The CDI cases were recruited at 4 UK hospitals (Leeds, Bradford, and London [2 centers]). Environmental samples (5 room sites) were taken pretreatment and at 2–3, 4–5, 6–8, and 9–12 days of treatment, end of treatment (EOT), and post-EOT. Fecal samples were collected at diagnosis and as often as produced thereafter. Swabs/feces were cultured for C difficile; percentage of C difficile-positive samples and C difficile bioburden were compared between different treatment arms at each time point. RESULTS: Pre-EOT (n = 244), there was a significant reduction in environmental contamination (≥1 site positive) around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients at days 4–5 (30% vs 50% recipients, P = .04) and at days 9–12 (22% vs 49%, P = .005). This trend was consistently seen at all other timepoints, but it was not statistically significant. No differences were seen between treatment groups post-EOT (n = 76). Fidaxomicin-associated fecal positivity rates and colony counts were consistently lower than those for vancomycin/metronidazole from days 4 to 5 of treatment (including post-EOT); however, the only significant difference was in positivity rate at days 9–12 (15% vs 55%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant reductions in C difficile recovery from both feces and the environment around fidaxomicin versus vancomycin/metronidazole recipients. Therefore, fidaxomicin treatment may lower the C difficile transmission risk by reducing excretion and environmental contamination. Oxford University Press 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7651500/ /pubmed/33204744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa362 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Articles Davies, Kerrie Mawer, Damian Walker, A Sarah Berry, Claire Planche, Timothy Stanley, Phil Goldenberg, Simon Sandoe, Jonathan Wilcox, Mark H An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title | An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title_full | An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title_fullStr | An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title_short | An Analysis of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination During and After Treatment for C difficile Infection |
title_sort | analysis of clostridium difficile environmental contamination during and after treatment for c difficile infection |
topic | Major Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davieskerrie ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT mawerdamian ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT walkerasarah ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT berryclaire ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT planchetimothy ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT stanleyphil ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT goldenbergsimon ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT sandoejonathan ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT wilcoxmarkh ananalysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT davieskerrie analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT mawerdamian analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT walkerasarah analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT berryclaire analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT planchetimothy analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT stanleyphil analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT goldenbergsimon analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT sandoejonathan analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection AT wilcoxmarkh analysisofclostridiumdifficileenvironmentalcontaminationduringandaftertreatmentforcdifficileinfection |