Cargando…

Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastwood, Kathryn, Nambiar, Dhanya, Dwyer, Rosamond, Lowthian, Judy A, Cameron, Peter, Smith, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33158837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042351
_version_ 1783607586444017664
author Eastwood, Kathryn
Nambiar, Dhanya
Dwyer, Rosamond
Lowthian, Judy A
Cameron, Peter
Smith, Karen
author_facet Eastwood, Kathryn
Nambiar, Dhanya
Dwyer, Rosamond
Lowthian, Judy A
Cameron, Peter
Smith, Karen
author_sort Eastwood, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; however, some are returned for ambulance dispatch (secondary dispatch). Older adult patients are frequent users of ambulance services; however, little is known about the appropriateness of subsequent secondary dispatches. OBJECTIVES: To examine the appropriateness of secondary dispatch through a comparison of the characteristics and ambulance outcomes of older patients dispatched an emergency ambulance via direct or secondary dispatch. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of ambulance patient data between September 2009 and June 2012 was conducted. SETTING: The secondary telephone triage service operated in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia during the study period. PARTICIPANTS: There were 90 086 patients included aged 65 years and over who had an emergency ambulance dispatch via direct or secondary dispatch with one of the five most common secondary dispatch paramedic diagnoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analyses compared characteristics, treatment and transportation rates between direct and secondary dispatch patients. RESULTS: The dispatch groups were similar in demographics, vital signs and hospital transportation rates. However, secondary dispatch patients were half as likely to be treated by paramedics (OR 0.51; CI 0.48 to 0.55; p<0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreasing treatment (p<0.005) and increasing transportation rates (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: Secondary triage could identify patients who would ultimately be transported to an emergency department. However, the lower paramedic treatment rates suggest many secondary dispatch patients may have been suitable for referral to alternative low-acuity transport or referral options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7651717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76517172020-11-17 Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study Eastwood, Kathryn Nambiar, Dhanya Dwyer, Rosamond Lowthian, Judy A Cameron, Peter Smith, Karen BMJ Open Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; however, some are returned for ambulance dispatch (secondary dispatch). Older adult patients are frequent users of ambulance services; however, little is known about the appropriateness of subsequent secondary dispatches. OBJECTIVES: To examine the appropriateness of secondary dispatch through a comparison of the characteristics and ambulance outcomes of older patients dispatched an emergency ambulance via direct or secondary dispatch. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of ambulance patient data between September 2009 and June 2012 was conducted. SETTING: The secondary telephone triage service operated in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia during the study period. PARTICIPANTS: There were 90 086 patients included aged 65 years and over who had an emergency ambulance dispatch via direct or secondary dispatch with one of the five most common secondary dispatch paramedic diagnoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analyses compared characteristics, treatment and transportation rates between direct and secondary dispatch patients. RESULTS: The dispatch groups were similar in demographics, vital signs and hospital transportation rates. However, secondary dispatch patients were half as likely to be treated by paramedics (OR 0.51; CI 0.48 to 0.55; p<0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreasing treatment (p<0.005) and increasing transportation rates (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: Secondary triage could identify patients who would ultimately be transported to an emergency department. However, the lower paramedic treatment rates suggest many secondary dispatch patients may have been suitable for referral to alternative low-acuity transport or referral options. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7651717/ /pubmed/33158837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042351 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Eastwood, Kathryn
Nambiar, Dhanya
Dwyer, Rosamond
Lowthian, Judy A
Cameron, Peter
Smith, Karen
Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan melbourne, australia: a retrospective cohort study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33158837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042351
work_keys_str_mv AT eastwoodkathryn ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nambiardhanya ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dwyerrosamond ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lowthianjudya ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cameronpeter ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT smithkaren ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy