Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study

Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Boyu, Xiong, Chengjie, Tan, Linying, Zhao, Dongdong, Xu, Feng, Kang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382
_version_ 1783607615244206080
author Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Tan, Linying
Zhao, Dongdong
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_facet Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Tan, Linying
Zhao, Dongdong
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_sort Wu, Boyu
collection PubMed
description Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the treatment of LCSS and LRS. In the present study, MED was used as a reference to evaluate this newly developed approach. A total of 82 and 52 patients with radicular leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication symptoms were treated by spinal canal decompression using the MED or iLESSYS(®) Delta approach, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed using the Modified MacNab's criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Finally, the effectiveness of the decompression was evaluated on a cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSAD) at the disc level. The incision length in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly decreased compared with the MED group (P<0.05); however, the duration of the operation in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly longer compared with the MED group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the back and ODI score in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group were significantly decreased compared with the MED group at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.0125). The postoperative CSAD was also significantly increased in both groups compared with before the operation (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative CSAD between the two groups. The good-to-excellent rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta approach were 89.0 and 90.4%, respectively, whereas the complication rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta system were 3.66 and 3.85% in the two groups, respectively. In conclusion, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach was identified to be comparable with the MED approach for treating LCSS and LRS, demonstrating both precise and limited decompression. In addition, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach may reduce the short-term back pain and promote faster recovery compared with the MED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7651884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76518842020-11-10 Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Tan, Linying Zhao, Dongdong Xu, Feng Kang, Hui Exp Ther Med Articles Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the treatment of LCSS and LRS. In the present study, MED was used as a reference to evaluate this newly developed approach. A total of 82 and 52 patients with radicular leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication symptoms were treated by spinal canal decompression using the MED or iLESSYS(®) Delta approach, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed using the Modified MacNab's criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Finally, the effectiveness of the decompression was evaluated on a cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSAD) at the disc level. The incision length in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly decreased compared with the MED group (P<0.05); however, the duration of the operation in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly longer compared with the MED group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the back and ODI score in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group were significantly decreased compared with the MED group at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.0125). The postoperative CSAD was also significantly increased in both groups compared with before the operation (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative CSAD between the two groups. The good-to-excellent rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta approach were 89.0 and 90.4%, respectively, whereas the complication rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta system were 3.66 and 3.85% in the two groups, respectively. In conclusion, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach was identified to be comparable with the MED approach for treating LCSS and LRS, demonstrating both precise and limited decompression. In addition, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach may reduce the short-term back pain and promote faster recovery compared with the MED. D.A. Spandidos 2020-12 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7651884/ /pubmed/33178350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382 Text en Copyright: © Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Tan, Linying
Zhao, Dongdong
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title_full Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title_short Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
title_sort clinical outcomes of med and ilessys(®) delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: a comparison study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382
work_keys_str_mv AT wuboyu clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy
AT xiongchengjie clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy
AT tanlinying clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy
AT zhaodongdong clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy
AT xufeng clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy
AT kanghui clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy