Cargando…
Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study
Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382 |
_version_ | 1783607615244206080 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Tan, Linying Zhao, Dongdong Xu, Feng Kang, Hui |
author_facet | Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Tan, Linying Zhao, Dongdong Xu, Feng Kang, Hui |
author_sort | Wu, Boyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the treatment of LCSS and LRS. In the present study, MED was used as a reference to evaluate this newly developed approach. A total of 82 and 52 patients with radicular leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication symptoms were treated by spinal canal decompression using the MED or iLESSYS(®) Delta approach, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed using the Modified MacNab's criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Finally, the effectiveness of the decompression was evaluated on a cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSAD) at the disc level. The incision length in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly decreased compared with the MED group (P<0.05); however, the duration of the operation in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly longer compared with the MED group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the back and ODI score in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group were significantly decreased compared with the MED group at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.0125). The postoperative CSAD was also significantly increased in both groups compared with before the operation (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative CSAD between the two groups. The good-to-excellent rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta approach were 89.0 and 90.4%, respectively, whereas the complication rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta system were 3.66 and 3.85% in the two groups, respectively. In conclusion, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach was identified to be comparable with the MED approach for treating LCSS and LRS, demonstrating both precise and limited decompression. In addition, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach may reduce the short-term back pain and promote faster recovery compared with the MED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7651884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76518842020-11-10 Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Tan, Linying Zhao, Dongdong Xu, Feng Kang, Hui Exp Ther Med Articles Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is an established procedure used to treat lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS). The Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System iLESSYS(®) Delta approach has been developed from the traditional interlaminar endoscopic technique for the treatment of LCSS and LRS. In the present study, MED was used as a reference to evaluate this newly developed approach. A total of 82 and 52 patients with radicular leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication symptoms were treated by spinal canal decompression using the MED or iLESSYS(®) Delta approach, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed using the Modified MacNab's criteria, visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Finally, the effectiveness of the decompression was evaluated on a cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSAD) at the disc level. The incision length in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly decreased compared with the MED group (P<0.05); however, the duration of the operation in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group was significantly longer compared with the MED group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the back and ODI score in the iLESSYS(®) Delta group were significantly decreased compared with the MED group at the 1-week follow-up (P<0.0125). The postoperative CSAD was also significantly increased in both groups compared with before the operation (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the postoperative CSAD between the two groups. The good-to-excellent rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta approach were 89.0 and 90.4%, respectively, whereas the complication rates of the MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta system were 3.66 and 3.85% in the two groups, respectively. In conclusion, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach was identified to be comparable with the MED approach for treating LCSS and LRS, demonstrating both precise and limited decompression. In addition, the iLESSYS(®) Delta approach may reduce the short-term back pain and promote faster recovery compared with the MED. D.A. Spandidos 2020-12 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7651884/ /pubmed/33178350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382 Text en Copyright: © Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Tan, Linying Zhao, Dongdong Xu, Feng Kang, Hui Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title | Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title_full | Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title_short | Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of med and ilessys(®) delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: a comparison study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuboyu clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy AT xiongchengjie clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy AT tanlinying clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy AT zhaodongdong clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy AT xufeng clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy AT kanghui clinicaloutcomesofmedandilessysdeltaforthetreatmentoflumbarcentralspinalstenosisandlateralrecessstenosisacomparisonstudy |