Cargando…
International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons
Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning. Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined funct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27554825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw111 |
_version_ | 1783607616236158976 |
---|---|
author | Zelmer, Jennifer Ronchi, Elettra Hyppönen, Hannele Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco Codagnone, Cristiano Nøhr, Christian Huebner, Ursula Fazzalari, Anne Adler-Milstein, Julia |
author_facet | Zelmer, Jennifer Ronchi, Elettra Hyppönen, Hannele Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco Codagnone, Cristiano Nøhr, Christian Huebner, Ursula Fazzalari, Anne Adler-Milstein, Julia |
author_sort | Zelmer, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning. Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined functionality-based measures for availability and use of electronic health records, health information exchange, personal health records, and telehealth. In this pilot, an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group compiled results for 38 countries for a subset of measures with broad coverage using new and/or adapted country-specific or multinational surveys and other sources from 2012 to 2015. We also synthesized country learnings to inform future benchmarking. Results: While electronic records are widely used to store and manage patient information at the point of care—all but 2 pilot countries reported use by at least half of primary care physicians; many had rates above 75%—patient information exchange across organizations/settings is less common. Large variations in the availability and use of telehealth and personal health records also exist. Discussion: Pilot participation demonstrated interest in cross-national benchmarking. Using the most comparable measures available to date, it showed substantial diversity in health ICT availability and use in all domains. The project also identified methodological considerations (e.g., structural and health systems issues that can affect measurement) important for future comparisons. Conclusion: While health policies and priorities differ, many nations aim to increase access, quality, and/or efficiency of care through effective ICT use. By identifying variations and describing key contextual factors, benchmarking offers the potential to facilitate cross-national learning and accelerate the progress of individual countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7651944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76519442020-11-30 International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons Zelmer, Jennifer Ronchi, Elettra Hyppönen, Hannele Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco Codagnone, Cristiano Nøhr, Christian Huebner, Ursula Fazzalari, Anne Adler-Milstein, Julia J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning. Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined functionality-based measures for availability and use of electronic health records, health information exchange, personal health records, and telehealth. In this pilot, an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group compiled results for 38 countries for a subset of measures with broad coverage using new and/or adapted country-specific or multinational surveys and other sources from 2012 to 2015. We also synthesized country learnings to inform future benchmarking. Results: While electronic records are widely used to store and manage patient information at the point of care—all but 2 pilot countries reported use by at least half of primary care physicians; many had rates above 75%—patient information exchange across organizations/settings is less common. Large variations in the availability and use of telehealth and personal health records also exist. Discussion: Pilot participation demonstrated interest in cross-national benchmarking. Using the most comparable measures available to date, it showed substantial diversity in health ICT availability and use in all domains. The project also identified methodological considerations (e.g., structural and health systems issues that can affect measurement) important for future comparisons. Conclusion: While health policies and priorities differ, many nations aim to increase access, quality, and/or efficiency of care through effective ICT use. By identifying variations and describing key contextual factors, benchmarking offers the potential to facilitate cross-national learning and accelerate the progress of individual countries. Oxford University Press 2017-03 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7651944/ /pubmed/27554825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw111 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Zelmer, Jennifer Ronchi, Elettra Hyppönen, Hannele Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco Codagnone, Cristiano Nøhr, Christian Huebner, Ursula Fazzalari, Anne Adler-Milstein, Julia International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title | International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title_full | International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title_fullStr | International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title_full_unstemmed | International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title_short | International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
title_sort | international health it benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27554825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zelmerjennifer internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT ronchielettra internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT hypponenhannele internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT lupianezvillanuevafrancisco internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT codagnonecristiano internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT nøhrchristian internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT huebnerursula internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT fazzalarianne internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons AT adlermilsteinjulia internationalhealthitbenchmarkinglearningfromcrosscountrycomparisons |