Cargando…

E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study

Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spjuth, Ola, Karlsson, Andreas, Clements, Mark, Humphreys, Keith, Ivansson, Emma, Dowling, Jim, Eklund, Martin, Jauhiainen, Alexandra, Czene, Kamila, Grönberg, Henrik, Sparén, Pär, Wiklund, Fredrik, Cheddad, Abbas, Pálsdóttir, þorgerður, Rantalainen, Mattias, Abrahamsson, Linda, Laure, Erwin, Litton, Jan-Eric, Palmgren, Juni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038
_version_ 1783607616484671488
author Spjuth, Ola
Karlsson, Andreas
Clements, Mark
Humphreys, Keith
Ivansson, Emma
Dowling, Jim
Eklund, Martin
Jauhiainen, Alexandra
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Sparén, Pär
Wiklund, Fredrik
Cheddad, Abbas
Pálsdóttir, þorgerður
Rantalainen, Mattias
Abrahamsson, Linda
Laure, Erwin
Litton, Jan-Eric
Palmgren, Juni
author_facet Spjuth, Ola
Karlsson, Andreas
Clements, Mark
Humphreys, Keith
Ivansson, Emma
Dowling, Jim
Eklund, Martin
Jauhiainen, Alexandra
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Sparén, Pär
Wiklund, Fredrik
Cheddad, Abbas
Pálsdóttir, þorgerður
Rantalainen, Mattias
Abrahamsson, Linda
Laure, Erwin
Litton, Jan-Eric
Palmgren, Juni
author_sort Spjuth, Ola
collection PubMed
description Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initiative in Sweden, e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (eCPC), which supports biomarker discovery and offers decision support for personalized intervention strategies. The generic eCPC contribution is a workflow with 4 nodes applied iteratively, and the concept of e-Science signifies systematic use of tools from the mathematical, statistical, data, and computer sciences. Results:The eCPC workflow is illustrated through 2 case studies. For prostate cancer, an in-house personalized screening tool, the Stockholm-3 model (S3M), is presented as an alternative to prostate-specific antigen testing alone. S3M is evaluated in a trial setting and plans for rollout in the population are discussed. For breast cancer, new biomarkers based on breast density and molecular profiles are developed and the US multicenter Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures (WISDOM) trial is referred to for evaluation. While current eCPC data management uses a traditional data warehouse model, we discuss eCPC-developed features of a coherent data integration platform. Discussion and Conclusion:E-Science tools are a key part of an evidence-based process for personalized medicine. This paper provides a structured workflow from data and models to evaluation of new personalized intervention strategies. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration is emphasized. Importantly, the generic concepts of the suggested eCPC workflow are transferrable to other disease domains, although each disease will require tailored solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7651972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76519722020-11-30 E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study Spjuth, Ola Karlsson, Andreas Clements, Mark Humphreys, Keith Ivansson, Emma Dowling, Jim Eklund, Martin Jauhiainen, Alexandra Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Sparén, Pär Wiklund, Fredrik Cheddad, Abbas Pálsdóttir, þorgerður Rantalainen, Mattias Abrahamsson, Linda Laure, Erwin Litton, Jan-Eric Palmgren, Juni J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initiative in Sweden, e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (eCPC), which supports biomarker discovery and offers decision support for personalized intervention strategies. The generic eCPC contribution is a workflow with 4 nodes applied iteratively, and the concept of e-Science signifies systematic use of tools from the mathematical, statistical, data, and computer sciences. Results:The eCPC workflow is illustrated through 2 case studies. For prostate cancer, an in-house personalized screening tool, the Stockholm-3 model (S3M), is presented as an alternative to prostate-specific antigen testing alone. S3M is evaluated in a trial setting and plans for rollout in the population are discussed. For breast cancer, new biomarkers based on breast density and molecular profiles are developed and the US multicenter Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures (WISDOM) trial is referred to for evaluation. While current eCPC data management uses a traditional data warehouse model, we discuss eCPC-developed features of a coherent data integration platform. Discussion and Conclusion:E-Science tools are a key part of an evidence-based process for personalized medicine. This paper provides a structured workflow from data and models to evaluation of new personalized intervention strategies. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration is emphasized. Importantly, the generic concepts of the suggested eCPC workflow are transferrable to other disease domains, although each disease will require tailored solutions. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7651972/ /pubmed/28444384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Spjuth, Ola
Karlsson, Andreas
Clements, Mark
Humphreys, Keith
Ivansson, Emma
Dowling, Jim
Eklund, Martin
Jauhiainen, Alexandra
Czene, Kamila
Grönberg, Henrik
Sparén, Pär
Wiklund, Fredrik
Cheddad, Abbas
Pálsdóttir, þorgerður
Rantalainen, Mattias
Abrahamsson, Linda
Laure, Erwin
Litton, Jan-Eric
Palmgren, Juni
E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title_full E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title_fullStr E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title_full_unstemmed E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title_short E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
title_sort e-science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038
work_keys_str_mv AT spjuthola esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT karlssonandreas esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT clementsmark esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT humphreyskeith esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT ivanssonemma esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT dowlingjim esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT eklundmartin esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT jauhiainenalexandra esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT czenekamila esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT gronberghenrik esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT sparenpar esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT wiklundfredrik esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT cheddadabbas esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT palsdottirþorgerður esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT rantalainenmattias esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT abrahamssonlinda esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT laureerwin esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT littonjaneric esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy
AT palmgrenjuni esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy