Cargando…
E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study
Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038 |
_version_ | 1783607616484671488 |
---|---|
author | Spjuth, Ola Karlsson, Andreas Clements, Mark Humphreys, Keith Ivansson, Emma Dowling, Jim Eklund, Martin Jauhiainen, Alexandra Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Sparén, Pär Wiklund, Fredrik Cheddad, Abbas Pálsdóttir, þorgerður Rantalainen, Mattias Abrahamsson, Linda Laure, Erwin Litton, Jan-Eric Palmgren, Juni |
author_facet | Spjuth, Ola Karlsson, Andreas Clements, Mark Humphreys, Keith Ivansson, Emma Dowling, Jim Eklund, Martin Jauhiainen, Alexandra Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Sparén, Pär Wiklund, Fredrik Cheddad, Abbas Pálsdóttir, þorgerður Rantalainen, Mattias Abrahamsson, Linda Laure, Erwin Litton, Jan-Eric Palmgren, Juni |
author_sort | Spjuth, Ola |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initiative in Sweden, e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (eCPC), which supports biomarker discovery and offers decision support for personalized intervention strategies. The generic eCPC contribution is a workflow with 4 nodes applied iteratively, and the concept of e-Science signifies systematic use of tools from the mathematical, statistical, data, and computer sciences. Results:The eCPC workflow is illustrated through 2 case studies. For prostate cancer, an in-house personalized screening tool, the Stockholm-3 model (S3M), is presented as an alternative to prostate-specific antigen testing alone. S3M is evaluated in a trial setting and plans for rollout in the population are discussed. For breast cancer, new biomarkers based on breast density and molecular profiles are developed and the US multicenter Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures (WISDOM) trial is referred to for evaluation. While current eCPC data management uses a traditional data warehouse model, we discuss eCPC-developed features of a coherent data integration platform. Discussion and Conclusion:E-Science tools are a key part of an evidence-based process for personalized medicine. This paper provides a structured workflow from data and models to evaluation of new personalized intervention strategies. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration is emphasized. Importantly, the generic concepts of the suggested eCPC workflow are transferrable to other disease domains, although each disease will require tailored solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7651972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76519722020-11-30 E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study Spjuth, Ola Karlsson, Andreas Clements, Mark Humphreys, Keith Ivansson, Emma Dowling, Jim Eklund, Martin Jauhiainen, Alexandra Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Sparén, Pär Wiklund, Fredrik Cheddad, Abbas Pálsdóttir, þorgerður Rantalainen, Mattias Abrahamsson, Linda Laure, Erwin Litton, Jan-Eric Palmgren, Juni J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Objective:We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods:We describe an e-Science initiative in Sweden, e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (eCPC), which supports biomarker discovery and offers decision support for personalized intervention strategies. The generic eCPC contribution is a workflow with 4 nodes applied iteratively, and the concept of e-Science signifies systematic use of tools from the mathematical, statistical, data, and computer sciences. Results:The eCPC workflow is illustrated through 2 case studies. For prostate cancer, an in-house personalized screening tool, the Stockholm-3 model (S3M), is presented as an alternative to prostate-specific antigen testing alone. S3M is evaluated in a trial setting and plans for rollout in the population are discussed. For breast cancer, new biomarkers based on breast density and molecular profiles are developed and the US multicenter Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures (WISDOM) trial is referred to for evaluation. While current eCPC data management uses a traditional data warehouse model, we discuss eCPC-developed features of a coherent data integration platform. Discussion and Conclusion:E-Science tools are a key part of an evidence-based process for personalized medicine. This paper provides a structured workflow from data and models to evaluation of new personalized intervention strategies. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration is emphasized. Importantly, the generic concepts of the suggested eCPC workflow are transferrable to other disease domains, although each disease will require tailored solutions. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7651972/ /pubmed/28444384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Spjuth, Ola Karlsson, Andreas Clements, Mark Humphreys, Keith Ivansson, Emma Dowling, Jim Eklund, Martin Jauhiainen, Alexandra Czene, Kamila Grönberg, Henrik Sparén, Pär Wiklund, Fredrik Cheddad, Abbas Pálsdóttir, þorgerður Rantalainen, Mattias Abrahamsson, Linda Laure, Erwin Litton, Jan-Eric Palmgren, Juni E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title | E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title_full | E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title_fullStr | E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title_short | E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
title_sort | e-science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spjuthola esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT karlssonandreas esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT clementsmark esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT humphreyskeith esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT ivanssonemma esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT dowlingjim esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT eklundmartin esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT jauhiainenalexandra esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT czenekamila esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT gronberghenrik esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT sparenpar esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT wiklundfredrik esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT cheddadabbas esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT palsdottirþorgerður esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT rantalainenmattias esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT abrahamssonlinda esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT laureerwin esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT littonjaneric esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy AT palmgrenjuni esciencetechnologiesinaworkflowforpersonalizedmedicineusingcancerscreeningasacasestudy |