Cargando…

The Role of Barriers and Community-Based Education in Compliance to Regular Eye Exams in New York City’s Harlem Community

Background The American Optometric Association (AOA) recommends adults between the ages of 18 to 65 have an eye exam every two years while older individuals or those who utilize vision correction should have yearly exams. Previous vision screenings throughout New York City’s Harlem community determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moumneh, Khaled, Centeno Gavica, Jenifer, Centeno Gavica, Mishelle S, Terrell, Mark, Lomiguen, Christine M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178528
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10875
Descripción
Sumario:Background The American Optometric Association (AOA) recommends adults between the ages of 18 to 65 have an eye exam every two years while older individuals or those who utilize vision correction should have yearly exams. Previous vision screenings throughout New York City’s Harlem community determined that 60% warranted referral to an ophthalmologist.  Objective As delayed vision screening could potentially leave a sight-threatening condition undiagnosed for many years, the objective of this study was to identify barriers to regular eye examinations. Methods A voluntary anonymous survey was verbally administered and recorded at free medical student-run vision screenings throughout multiple Harlem community health fairs. Data gathered included demographics, insurance coverage, comfort with an eye exam, and knowledge associated with an ophthalmologist eye exam. As a strategy to curtail the frequency of non-compliance to regular eye examinations, all participants were then educated about knowledge of ocular examinations and assured about uncertainties. Comfort levels were remeasured after education to determine the effectiveness and impact of community-based education. Results One hundred surveys fit the inclusion criteria. Of the participants with suboptimal knowledge of an eye exam (n=41), 32% were more comfortable after education and assurance versus 3% of the optimal knowledge participants (n=59). Of the participants with non-compliance to regular eye exams (n=39), 41% had suboptimal knowledge and 23% were more comfortable after education versus 33% and 10% of the compliant participants (n=61), respectively. Participants with suboptimal knowledge were 20.9% more likely to be noncompliant with regular eye examinations and at the same time, 18.1% more likely to have increased comfort after education and assurance than those with optimal knowledge. Of the participants without medical insurance (n=15), 67% were noncompliant with regular eye examinations and 60% had suboptimal knowledge versus 34% and 38% of the insured participants (n=85), respectively. Participants with medical insurance were 23.8% more likely to be compliant with regular eye examinations than those without medical insurance. Conclusion Measured perceptions of ophthalmology in New York City’s Harlem community solidifies a lack of education as a clear barrier against proper vision care. Lack of health insurance coverage also contributed to decreased participation in regular eye examinations but to a lesser extent than education. These results suggest that empowering people through education can significantly improve compliance with regularly scheduled eye exams, thus improving the overall visual health of this minority-rich community.