Cargando…
The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants into clinical trials continues to be a challenge, which can result in study delay or termination. Recent studies have used social media to enhance recruitment outcomes. An assessment of the literature on the use of social media for this purpose is required. OBJECT...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104015 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22810 |
_version_ | 1783607744554598400 |
---|---|
author | Darmawan, Ida Bakker, Caitlin Brockman, Tabetha A Patten, Christi A Eder, Milton |
author_facet | Darmawan, Ida Bakker, Caitlin Brockman, Tabetha A Patten, Christi A Eder, Milton |
author_sort | Darmawan, Ida |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants into clinical trials continues to be a challenge, which can result in study delay or termination. Recent studies have used social media to enhance recruitment outcomes. An assessment of the literature on the use of social media for this purpose is required. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to answer the following questions: (1) How is the use of social media, in combination with traditional approaches to enhance clinical trial recruitment and enrollment, represented in the literature? and (2) Do the data on recruitment and enrollment outcomes presented in the literature allow for comparison across studies? METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across 7 platforms to identify clinical trials that combined social media and traditional methods to recruit patients. Study and participant characteristics, recruitment methods, and recruitment outcomes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: We identified 2371 titles and abstracts through our systematic search. Of these, we assessed 95 full papers and determined that 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17 studies reported enrollment outcomes, of which 9 achieved or exceeded their enrollment target. The proportion of participants enrolled from social media in these studies ranged from 0% to 49%. Across all 33 studies, the proportion of participants recruited and enrolled from social media varied greatly. A total of 9 studies reported higher enrollment rates from social media than any other methods, and 4 studies reported the lowest cost per enrolled participant from social media. CONCLUSIONS: While the assessment of the use of social media to improve clinical trial participation is hindered by reporting inconsistencies, preliminary data suggest that social media can increase participation and reduce per-participant cost. The adoption of consistent standards for reporting recruitment and enrollment outcomes is required to advance our understanding and use of social media to support clinical trial success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7652693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76526932020-11-13 The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review Darmawan, Ida Bakker, Caitlin Brockman, Tabetha A Patten, Christi A Eder, Milton J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants into clinical trials continues to be a challenge, which can result in study delay or termination. Recent studies have used social media to enhance recruitment outcomes. An assessment of the literature on the use of social media for this purpose is required. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to answer the following questions: (1) How is the use of social media, in combination with traditional approaches to enhance clinical trial recruitment and enrollment, represented in the literature? and (2) Do the data on recruitment and enrollment outcomes presented in the literature allow for comparison across studies? METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across 7 platforms to identify clinical trials that combined social media and traditional methods to recruit patients. Study and participant characteristics, recruitment methods, and recruitment outcomes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: We identified 2371 titles and abstracts through our systematic search. Of these, we assessed 95 full papers and determined that 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17 studies reported enrollment outcomes, of which 9 achieved or exceeded their enrollment target. The proportion of participants enrolled from social media in these studies ranged from 0% to 49%. Across all 33 studies, the proportion of participants recruited and enrolled from social media varied greatly. A total of 9 studies reported higher enrollment rates from social media than any other methods, and 4 studies reported the lowest cost per enrolled participant from social media. CONCLUSIONS: While the assessment of the use of social media to improve clinical trial participation is hindered by reporting inconsistencies, preliminary data suggest that social media can increase participation and reduce per-participant cost. The adoption of consistent standards for reporting recruitment and enrollment outcomes is required to advance our understanding and use of social media to support clinical trial success. JMIR Publications 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7652693/ /pubmed/33104015 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22810 Text en ©Ida Darmawan, Caitlin Bakker, Tabetha A Brockman, Christi A Patten, Milton Eder. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 26.10.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Darmawan, Ida Bakker, Caitlin Brockman, Tabetha A Patten, Christi A Eder, Milton The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title | The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title_full | The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title_short | The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review |
title_sort | role of social media in enhancing clinical trial recruitment: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104015 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darmawanida theroleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT bakkercaitlin theroleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT brockmantabethaa theroleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT pattenchristia theroleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT edermilton theroleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT darmawanida roleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT bakkercaitlin roleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT brockmantabethaa roleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT pattenchristia roleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview AT edermilton roleofsocialmediainenhancingclinicaltrialrecruitmentscopingreview |