Cargando…

Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands

INTRODUCTION: Accurate, precise and reliable laboratory test results play a critical role in medical decision making. To satisfy the increasing needs in clinical laboratory tests, the analyzers have been advanced. In this study, authors aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity i s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Jong Do, Song, Da Young, Nam, Youngwon, Li, Chihchiao, Kim, Seunghwan, Lee, Joon Hee, Lee, Kyunghoon, Song, Junghan, Song, Sang Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00185
_version_ 1783607761944182784
author Seo, Jong Do
Song, Da Young
Nam, Youngwon
Li, Chihchiao
Kim, Seunghwan
Lee, Joon Hee
Lee, Kyunghoon
Song, Junghan
Song, Sang Hoon
author_facet Seo, Jong Do
Song, Da Young
Nam, Youngwon
Li, Chihchiao
Kim, Seunghwan
Lee, Joon Hee
Lee, Kyunghoon
Song, Junghan
Song, Sang Hoon
author_sort Seo, Jong Do
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate, precise and reliable laboratory test results play a critical role in medical decision making. To satisfy the increasing needs in clinical laboratory tests, the analyzers have been advanced. In this study, authors aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity i system (Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA) for diverse analytes measured by using immunoassay principle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analytical performance of recently launched Alinity i system has been evaluated for 31 assays in aspects of precision, linearity and analytical measurement range, correlation with the Architect i2000sr system (Abbott Laboratories), carry-over, and reference interval validation in accordance with CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The within-laboratory CVs of the analytes tested in the study ranged between 1.00 and 7.84%, which met vendor claimed value in precision. In linearity test, most assays satisfied acceptable linearity criteria, best-fit first order regression or polynomial regression with nonlinearity smaller than ±10%, compared with linear regression. The recovery of each analyte distributed from 90.1 to 109.7%. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) for each test was larger than 0.95 except for folate when compared to the results obtained from existing routine analyzer and statistically or clinically equivalent. The carry-over rates were acceptable, and reference intervals were validated. CONCLUSION: Through this study, acceptable analytical performance of novel Alinity i system has been verified. It is expected to readily replace existing instrument and to be an option for laboratories considering introduction of automated immunoassay analyzer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7652776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76527762020-11-16 Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands Seo, Jong Do Song, Da Young Nam, Youngwon Li, Chihchiao Kim, Seunghwan Lee, Joon Hee Lee, Kyunghoon Song, Junghan Song, Sang Hoon Pract Lab Med Article INTRODUCTION: Accurate, precise and reliable laboratory test results play a critical role in medical decision making. To satisfy the increasing needs in clinical laboratory tests, the analyzers have been advanced. In this study, authors aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity i system (Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA) for diverse analytes measured by using immunoassay principle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analytical performance of recently launched Alinity i system has been evaluated for 31 assays in aspects of precision, linearity and analytical measurement range, correlation with the Architect i2000sr system (Abbott Laboratories), carry-over, and reference interval validation in accordance with CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: The within-laboratory CVs of the analytes tested in the study ranged between 1.00 and 7.84%, which met vendor claimed value in precision. In linearity test, most assays satisfied acceptable linearity criteria, best-fit first order regression or polynomial regression with nonlinearity smaller than ±10%, compared with linear regression. The recovery of each analyte distributed from 90.1 to 109.7%. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) for each test was larger than 0.95 except for folate when compared to the results obtained from existing routine analyzer and statistically or clinically equivalent. The carry-over rates were acceptable, and reference intervals were validated. CONCLUSION: Through this study, acceptable analytical performance of novel Alinity i system has been verified. It is expected to readily replace existing instrument and to be an option for laboratories considering introduction of automated immunoassay analyzer. Elsevier 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7652776/ /pubmed/33204790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00185 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Seo, Jong Do
Song, Da Young
Nam, Youngwon
Li, Chihchiao
Kim, Seunghwan
Lee, Joon Hee
Lee, Kyunghoon
Song, Junghan
Song, Sang Hoon
Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title_full Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title_fullStr Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title_short Evaluation of analytical performance of Alinity i system on 31 measurands
title_sort evaluation of analytical performance of alinity i system on 31 measurands
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00185
work_keys_str_mv AT seojongdo evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT songdayoung evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT namyoungwon evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT lichihchiao evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT kimseunghwan evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT leejoonhee evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT leekyunghoon evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT songjunghan evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands
AT songsanghoon evaluationofanalyticalperformanceofalinityisystemon31measurands