Cargando…

Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma

INTRODUCTION: Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This work aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tschauner, Sebastian, Marterer, Robert, Nagy, Eszter, Singer, Georg, Riccabona, Michael, Sorantin, Erich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32535775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9
_version_ 1783607769073451008
author Tschauner, Sebastian
Marterer, Robert
Nagy, Eszter
Singer, Georg
Riccabona, Michael
Sorantin, Erich
author_facet Tschauner, Sebastian
Marterer, Robert
Nagy, Eszter
Singer, Georg
Riccabona, Michael
Sorantin, Erich
author_sort Tschauner, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This work aimed to compare image quality and radiation dose of CBCT and MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four CBCT-MDCT examination pairs, containing nine MDCTs acquired in parallel prospectively and 45 MDCTs matched in retrospect, were included in this study. Image quality was analyzed semi-objectively by measuring noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and subjectively by performing image impression ratings. CT dose records were readout. RESULTS: Image noise was significantly lower in CBCT compared with MDCT, both semi-objectively and subjectively (both p < 0.001). CNR and SNRs were also in favor of CBCT, though CBCT examinations exhibited significantly more beam hardening artifacts that diminished the advantages of the superior semi-objective image quality. These artifacts were believed to occur more often in children due to numerous bone-cartilage transitions in open growth plates and may have led to a better subjective diagnostic certainty rating (p = 0.001). Motion artifacts were infrequently, but exclusively observed in CBCT. CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) was substantially lower in CBCT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dedicated extremity CBCT could be an alternative low-dose modality in the diagnostic pathway of pediatric fractures. At lower doses compared with MDCT and commonly affected by beam hardening artifacts, semi-objective CBCT image quality parameters were generally better than in MDCT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7652807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76528072020-11-12 Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma Tschauner, Sebastian Marterer, Robert Nagy, Eszter Singer, Georg Riccabona, Michael Sorantin, Erich Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article INTRODUCTION: Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This work aimed to compare image quality and radiation dose of CBCT and MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four CBCT-MDCT examination pairs, containing nine MDCTs acquired in parallel prospectively and 45 MDCTs matched in retrospect, were included in this study. Image quality was analyzed semi-objectively by measuring noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and subjectively by performing image impression ratings. CT dose records were readout. RESULTS: Image noise was significantly lower in CBCT compared with MDCT, both semi-objectively and subjectively (both p < 0.001). CNR and SNRs were also in favor of CBCT, though CBCT examinations exhibited significantly more beam hardening artifacts that diminished the advantages of the superior semi-objective image quality. These artifacts were believed to occur more often in children due to numerous bone-cartilage transitions in open growth plates and may have led to a better subjective diagnostic certainty rating (p = 0.001). Motion artifacts were infrequently, but exclusively observed in CBCT. CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) was substantially lower in CBCT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dedicated extremity CBCT could be an alternative low-dose modality in the diagnostic pathway of pediatric fractures. At lower doses compared with MDCT and commonly affected by beam hardening artifacts, semi-objective CBCT image quality parameters were generally better than in MDCT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7652807/ /pubmed/32535775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Tschauner, Sebastian
Marterer, Robert
Nagy, Eszter
Singer, Georg
Riccabona, Michael
Sorantin, Erich
Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title_full Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title_fullStr Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title_full_unstemmed Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title_short Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma
title_sort experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (cbct) and multidetector computed tomography (mdct) in pediatric extremity trauma
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32535775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tschaunersebastian experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma
AT martererrobert experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma
AT nagyeszter experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma
AT singergeorg experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma
AT riccabonamichael experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma
AT sorantinerich experienceswithimagequalityandradiationdoseofconebeamcomputedtomographycbctandmultidetectorcomputedtomographymdctinpediatricextremitytrauma