Cargando…

Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus

Keratoconus is a progressive ectatic corneal disorder, which can result in severe visual impairment. The new ABCD keratoconus classification system allows differentiated description of the disease. Aim of the study was to evaluate the components of this novel staging system (ARC, PRC, thinnest pachy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuhann, Sophie, Schuh, Anna, Krause, Daniel, Liegl, Raffael, Schmelter, Valerie, Kreutzer, Thomas, Mayer, Wolfgang J., Kohnen, Thomas, Priglinger, Siegfried, Shajari, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76020-6
_version_ 1783607775056625664
author Neuhann, Sophie
Schuh, Anna
Krause, Daniel
Liegl, Raffael
Schmelter, Valerie
Kreutzer, Thomas
Mayer, Wolfgang J.
Kohnen, Thomas
Priglinger, Siegfried
Shajari, Mehdi
author_facet Neuhann, Sophie
Schuh, Anna
Krause, Daniel
Liegl, Raffael
Schmelter, Valerie
Kreutzer, Thomas
Mayer, Wolfgang J.
Kohnen, Thomas
Priglinger, Siegfried
Shajari, Mehdi
author_sort Neuhann, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Keratoconus is a progressive ectatic corneal disorder, which can result in severe visual impairment. The new ABCD keratoconus classification system allows differentiated description of the disease. Aim of the study was to evaluate the components of this novel staging system (ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry) as well as topometric indices, deviation of normality indices, and other parameters in terms of repeatability and reliability. 317 eyes with keratoconus were examined twice with a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam, Oculus). Bland Altman analysis and intraclass correlations were carried out to evaluate the parameters repeatability and reliability. Apart from IHA (ICC = 0.730), all parameters showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.900). ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry, Kmax, CKI, KI, Rmin, and Progression Avg were the best repeatable parameters with relative repeatability values < 2.5%. Other parameters performing well in terms of repeatability were IHD, ISV, IVA, and final D (RR < 13%). Regression analysis revealed consistently high repeatability along all stages of keratoconus for PRC, thinnest pachymetry, and CKI. All parameters of the ABCD staging system showed excellent reliability and repeatability, PRC and thinnest pachymetry even at all stages of keratoconus and can consequently be reliably used in the determination of keratoconus progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7652832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76528322020-11-12 Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus Neuhann, Sophie Schuh, Anna Krause, Daniel Liegl, Raffael Schmelter, Valerie Kreutzer, Thomas Mayer, Wolfgang J. Kohnen, Thomas Priglinger, Siegfried Shajari, Mehdi Sci Rep Article Keratoconus is a progressive ectatic corneal disorder, which can result in severe visual impairment. The new ABCD keratoconus classification system allows differentiated description of the disease. Aim of the study was to evaluate the components of this novel staging system (ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry) as well as topometric indices, deviation of normality indices, and other parameters in terms of repeatability and reliability. 317 eyes with keratoconus were examined twice with a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam, Oculus). Bland Altman analysis and intraclass correlations were carried out to evaluate the parameters repeatability and reliability. Apart from IHA (ICC = 0.730), all parameters showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.900). ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry, Kmax, CKI, KI, Rmin, and Progression Avg were the best repeatable parameters with relative repeatability values < 2.5%. Other parameters performing well in terms of repeatability were IHD, ISV, IVA, and final D (RR < 13%). Regression analysis revealed consistently high repeatability along all stages of keratoconus for PRC, thinnest pachymetry, and CKI. All parameters of the ABCD staging system showed excellent reliability and repeatability, PRC and thinnest pachymetry even at all stages of keratoconus and can consequently be reliably used in the determination of keratoconus progression. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7652832/ /pubmed/33168836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76020-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Neuhann, Sophie
Schuh, Anna
Krause, Daniel
Liegl, Raffael
Schmelter, Valerie
Kreutzer, Thomas
Mayer, Wolfgang J.
Kohnen, Thomas
Priglinger, Siegfried
Shajari, Mehdi
Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title_full Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title_fullStr Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title_short Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
title_sort comparison of variables measured with a scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76020-6
work_keys_str_mv AT neuhannsophie comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT schuhanna comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT krausedaniel comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT lieglraffael comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT schmeltervalerie comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT kreutzerthomas comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT mayerwolfgangj comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT kohnenthomas comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT priglingersiegfried comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus
AT shajarimehdi comparisonofvariablesmeasuredwithascheimpflugdeviceforevaluationofprogressionanddetectionofkeratoconus