Cargando…
Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach
High variability in somatic embryo (SE)-forming capacity has previously been observed in several spinach cultivars. Such variability frequently accounted for more variation in embryogenic response of the explants than the factor being investigated. Hence, the variability in embryogenic capacity was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76279-9 |
_version_ | 1783607781652168704 |
---|---|
author | Belić, Maja Zdravković-Korać, Snežana Uzelac, Branka Ćalić, Dušica Pavlović, Suzana Milojević, Jelena |
author_facet | Belić, Maja Zdravković-Korać, Snežana Uzelac, Branka Ćalić, Dušica Pavlović, Suzana Milojević, Jelena |
author_sort | Belić, Maja |
collection | PubMed |
description | High variability in somatic embryo (SE)-forming capacity has previously been observed in several spinach cultivars. Such variability frequently accounted for more variation in embryogenic response of the explants than the factor being investigated. Hence, the variability in embryogenic capacity was examined in the present study at both the population and the single-seedling level, using seeds of spinach cultivar Matador obtained from nine European seed companies. Seed population obtained from Slovenia (Sl) was superior to others, with the highest regeneration frequency (100%) and the highest mean SE number (14.4). A total of 82% of these seedlings had 80–100% of regenerating explants, while in populations with intermediate embryogenic capacity approximately 40% of seedlings had 20–60% of regenerating explants. The explants from the majority of seedlings (52–100%) in the least responsive populations were irresponsive. Furthermore, the explants from Sl seedlings regenerated from 10–20 (43.5%) up to > 20 (27.6%) SEs on average, while the explants from the majority of seedlings belonging to other populations regenerated 1–10 SEs. The present study strongly indicates that the variability of plant material must not be overlooked, because choosing more responsive individuals for one treatment and less responsive ones for another may lead to misinterpretation of the data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7652860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76528602020-11-12 Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach Belić, Maja Zdravković-Korać, Snežana Uzelac, Branka Ćalić, Dušica Pavlović, Suzana Milojević, Jelena Sci Rep Article High variability in somatic embryo (SE)-forming capacity has previously been observed in several spinach cultivars. Such variability frequently accounted for more variation in embryogenic response of the explants than the factor being investigated. Hence, the variability in embryogenic capacity was examined in the present study at both the population and the single-seedling level, using seeds of spinach cultivar Matador obtained from nine European seed companies. Seed population obtained from Slovenia (Sl) was superior to others, with the highest regeneration frequency (100%) and the highest mean SE number (14.4). A total of 82% of these seedlings had 80–100% of regenerating explants, while in populations with intermediate embryogenic capacity approximately 40% of seedlings had 20–60% of regenerating explants. The explants from the majority of seedlings (52–100%) in the least responsive populations were irresponsive. Furthermore, the explants from Sl seedlings regenerated from 10–20 (43.5%) up to > 20 (27.6%) SEs on average, while the explants from the majority of seedlings belonging to other populations regenerated 1–10 SEs. The present study strongly indicates that the variability of plant material must not be overlooked, because choosing more responsive individuals for one treatment and less responsive ones for another may lead to misinterpretation of the data. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7652860/ /pubmed/33168872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76279-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Belić, Maja Zdravković-Korać, Snežana Uzelac, Branka Ćalić, Dušica Pavlović, Suzana Milojević, Jelena Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title | Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title_full | Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title_fullStr | Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title_short | Variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
title_sort | variability in somatic embryo-forming capacity of spinach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76279-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belicmaja variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach AT zdravkovickoracsnezana variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach AT uzelacbranka variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach AT calicdusica variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach AT pavlovicsuzana variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach AT milojevicjelena variabilityinsomaticembryoformingcapacityofspinach |