Cargando…

Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

INTRODUCTION: Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly studied in comparative effectiveness research (CER), and there is a need for improvements in CHI research practices. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee (MC) launched an effort in 2016 to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esmail, Laura C., Barasky, Rebecca, Mittman, Brian S., Hickam, David H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33107006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6
_version_ 1783607805828136960
author Esmail, Laura C.
Barasky, Rebecca
Mittman, Brian S.
Hickam, David H.
author_facet Esmail, Laura C.
Barasky, Rebecca
Mittman, Brian S.
Hickam, David H.
author_sort Esmail, Laura C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly studied in comparative effectiveness research (CER), and there is a need for improvements in CHI research practices. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee (MC) launched an effort in 2016 to develop formal guidance on this topic. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of minimal standards for scientifically valid, transparent, and reproducible CER studies of CHIs. The standards are intended to apply to research examining a broad range of healthcare interventions including delivery system, behavior change, and other non-pharmacological interventions. METHODS: We conducted a literature review, reviewed existing methods guidance, and developed standards through an iterative process involving the MC, two panels of external research methods experts, and a 60-day public comment period. The final standards were approved by the PCORI MC and adopted by the PCORI Board of Governors on April 30, 2018. RESULTS: The final standards include the following: (1) fully describe the intervention and comparator and define their core functions, (2) specify the hypothesized causal pathways and their theoretical basis, (3) specify how adaptations to the form of the intervention and comparator will be allowed and recorded, (4) plan and describe a process evaluation, and (5) select patient outcomes informed by the causal pathway. DISCUSSION: The new standards offer three major contributions to research: (1) they provide a simple framework to help investigators address the major methodological features of a CHI study, (2) they emphasize the importance of the causal model and the need to understand how a CHI achieves its effects rather than simply measuring these effects, and (3) they require description of a CHI using the concepts of core functions and forms. While these standards apply formally to PCORI-funded CER studies, they have broad applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7652976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76529762020-11-17 Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Esmail, Laura C. Barasky, Rebecca Mittman, Brian S. Hickam, David H. J Gen Intern Med Review Article INTRODUCTION: Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly studied in comparative effectiveness research (CER), and there is a need for improvements in CHI research practices. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee (MC) launched an effort in 2016 to develop formal guidance on this topic. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of minimal standards for scientifically valid, transparent, and reproducible CER studies of CHIs. The standards are intended to apply to research examining a broad range of healthcare interventions including delivery system, behavior change, and other non-pharmacological interventions. METHODS: We conducted a literature review, reviewed existing methods guidance, and developed standards through an iterative process involving the MC, two panels of external research methods experts, and a 60-day public comment period. The final standards were approved by the PCORI MC and adopted by the PCORI Board of Governors on April 30, 2018. RESULTS: The final standards include the following: (1) fully describe the intervention and comparator and define their core functions, (2) specify the hypothesized causal pathways and their theoretical basis, (3) specify how adaptations to the form of the intervention and comparator will be allowed and recorded, (4) plan and describe a process evaluation, and (5) select patient outcomes informed by the causal pathway. DISCUSSION: The new standards offer three major contributions to research: (1) they provide a simple framework to help investigators address the major methodological features of a CHI study, (2) they emphasize the importance of the causal model and the need to understand how a CHI achieves its effects rather than simply measuring these effects, and (3) they require description of a CHI using the concepts of core functions and forms. While these standards apply formally to PCORI-funded CER studies, they have broad applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-26 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7652976/ /pubmed/33107006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Esmail, Laura C.
Barasky, Rebecca
Mittman, Brian S.
Hickam, David H.
Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title_full Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title_fullStr Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title_full_unstemmed Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title_short Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
title_sort improving comparative effectiveness research of complex health interventions: standards from the patient-centered outcomes research institute (pcori)
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7652976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33107006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6
work_keys_str_mv AT esmaillaurac improvingcomparativeeffectivenessresearchofcomplexhealthinterventionsstandardsfromthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstitutepcori
AT baraskyrebecca improvingcomparativeeffectivenessresearchofcomplexhealthinterventionsstandardsfromthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstitutepcori
AT mittmanbrians improvingcomparativeeffectivenessresearchofcomplexhealthinterventionsstandardsfromthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstitutepcori
AT hickamdavidh improvingcomparativeeffectivenessresearchofcomplexhealthinterventionsstandardsfromthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstitutepcori